Connect with us

Op-Ed

Where in the World to ICO Part 3: Malta

Published

on

I don’t know about anyone else, but I scooped up some great deals over the past week. Bitcoin falling back below $7,000 and ETH below $400 was a real shock to me. People are starting to log into their cold storage and dump the coins they own, which is obviously never good news. For people who are actively watching prices, we can’t let some of these go by the wayside. I took a position in ETH at $383 and I am very happy with it.

If you’re like me and have been hoarding your coins in cold storage, times like these are when money is made. When your friends are ragging on you for your investments, when the SEC is banging doors down – now is the time to re-align your cost basis for the next 6-8 months. It is easy to be confident when you’re making money, and that is why there was a mass exodus the moment the market turned.

I didn’t think buying ETH at $500-600 was all that great of a deal, but $383? These are the prices that all of us wish we got in December. Don’t overlook great prices because of irrelevant news. If you’re confident in cryptocurrency, then you’re confident in the building blocks: Ethereum and bitcoin.

Coinbase

Coinbase has recently come out with support for ERC-20 Framework tokens for eventual listing on their site. To be honest, this means nothing to me. By market cap, EOS clearly would be the most likely choice for an ERC-20 that would be listed. However, Dan Larimer (Founder of EOS) has said EOS will be unrelated to Ethereum by the time his main net launches. Tron is second by market cap, and just launched their seemingly unrelated main net as well.

What does this mean? Coinbase is going to have to clarify what they mean by ERC-20 framework. ERC-20 tokens were fundraising chips that were used by many ICOs. However, once the ICO took off, they had money to build out their own blockchains and smart contracts that were not related to Ethereum.

Just like many things that happen in this crazy industry, I have to throw my hands up. The clear choices for listing would be Ripple and Stellar. They are both American companies based in Silicon Valley that have actual customers. The chatter online is that they “don’t fit the framework for listing” that Coinbase put out. This company has pissed me off too many times to count, along many other investors. There will be a time when Robinhood is allowed in all states, and I am hoping that this new entrant sticks to their guns and actually listens to the people who use their network.

ICO Environment

I can’t imagine many ICOs are happy with Ethereum being so low. Most investors don’t want to fork over multiple ETH coins for one single offering, and times like these are when confidence levels in fledgling coins are at all-time lows. However, many companies are using this time to wait and plan. Most of the “Winter ICOs” had little to no code, and the oversight was basically “don’t be a ponzi scheme”. In 2018, it won’t matter where you are launching from, there will be government agencies that will come after you if you don’t have what you say you have.

My research into Singapore and Switzerland was a reminder that things are truly not as bad as they seem. The United States dominates cryptocurrency news with only  8% of their public as investors. There is a whole world out there, and there are plenty of countries who have thriving blockchain commerce that is under the guidance of technology friendly government officials.

Malta

My next stop is the country of Malta. An island in the Mediterranean right in between the southern tip of Italy and the vastness of the North African desert. An oasis I’ve come to find. With a population less than 500,000, there aren’t going to be 15 different regulatory bodies and enforcement agencies trying to get their piece of the bureaucratic pie. The country has a GDP per capita of $36,000, which is not going to be similar to countries that we have already explored.

There is a spectrum to the types of countries that are friendly to ICOs. They are either very rich nations that want more, or poor nations that want to be rich. Each type of country is going to come with pros and cons.

With rich nations, they are usually already beholden to Western powers that can influence their laws and regulations. This results in large institutions being able to help you, but only for $100,000. If you can pay the entry ticket, the SROs and advocacy groups can provide you almost everything you need to be successful in their country.

Poorer nations invested in blockchain have very limited technological infrastructure, which is the double edged sword. They will not be able to offer the incubator that a country like Switzerland will, but very few have tried intervene in a utility token offering. Some of the old Soviet bloc countries are opening the door to mining, ICOs, and other fin-tech start-ups so that they can begin to take advantage of the level playing field that blockchain offers.

Malta is right in between a rich nation and a poor nation when it comes to blockchain. There isn’t going to be the bells and whistles that a Crypto Valley Association could bring, but it isn’t going to be a phone and desk in the middle of nowhere. There are lawyers, accountants, and even other blockchain businesses that are already on the island, and more are coming. The regulatory costs are far lower, and you would not be paying $100,000 in filing for a compliant offering like you have to do in Switzerland. But, is the ease of doing business the only thing that they can offer?

Background

Malta has been an inhabited island since 5200 B.C., and one doesn’t need to think too hard about why. It is an island in the middle of one of the largest commercial areas in the world, and presents many strategic opportunities for the right governments or rulers. I will not going into each conqueror, but over time there have been many rulers who controlled the Mediterranean by their strong hold in Malta.

in 1800, the French were ousted from Malta with the help of the British, whose sovereignty lasted until Maltese independence in 1964. For the first time, this tiny strategically placed island could speak independently and make their own decisions. This could not have come at a better time, as economic relationships between countries in Europe were becoming more and more intertwined. In 1980, Malta adopted a policy of neutrality, and have since maintained that status. In 2004, they joined the European Union, thus beginning to use the Euro instead of the Maltese Lira.

Legal Framework

After their induction into the European Union (EU), Malta adopted banking standards according to Basel Core Principles, which now govern all advanced Western nations. In 2014, the European Central Bank took control over banking oversight in member countries, and that has since put more pressure to homogenize the banking industry across borders. However, Malta has purposely chosen to operate based on principles, rather than strict interpretation of laws. With a population of less than a half million people, the dialogue between businesses and regulators can be very intimate.

MFSA

This is the MAS/FINMA of Malta. It is the single regulatory body that was established in 2002 as the rule maker to take over a growing list of responsibilities from the Malta Central Bank. The MFSA was created partly due to the pending induction into the European Union, where regulations and standards were far more robust.

Unlike some the other countries I have explored, MFSA’s priority is making sure that European banking standards are implemented without mistake. This partnership between nations seems to come with a long rule book, and MFSA has 312 full time employees to make sure that everything falls in line. Financial and credit companies in Malta must apply for a license, and MFSA encourages them to have a conversation prior to an application. The application process is a dialogue, not a one-sided affair. It is explained briefly by MFSA officials here:

“Credit and financial institutions in Malta require a licence from the MFSA. Before any formal application for a licence is made, the MFSA urges the promoters to meet with the regulator to discuss set-up and regulatory requirements to ensure a smooth licensing process. The final application must be accompanied by required supporting documentation such as a business plan, the type and volume of business to be undertaken and the structure, organisation and management system of the institution.” 

With such a tiny country to operate, MFSA has the infrastructure and power to allow a wide array of businesses that may be on the cutting edge. When a regulatory body asks for a business plan along with an application, there is a group that is using an open mind when assessing whether someone can do business in their country. I looked on the MFSA website, and there are about 400 ways to get in contact with them. They want to hear from businesspeople and create solutions for them. That is simply not the case in 99% of other countries.

Government Timeline

2013

Y2013 was a very early year for blockchain and cryptocurrency, with many people truly not knowing even the basic concept of bitcoin. Even in a time where information was drastically limited, the MFSA approved the first ever bitcoin hedge fund to operate out of their country. The company, Exante, began offering a fund that gave normal investors (non-U.S. of course!) the opportunity to invest in a vehicle that could give them access to a coin that did not have very many easily accessible marketplaces. For a 0.5% management fee, bitcoin became accessible to Europe through Malta.

2016

Malta Stock Exchange officials created a Blockchain Committee in 2016 to address the growing prospect of enhancing their countries banking processes. The officials found that the growing interest in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology could save the country millions in cross-currency bank settlements that are conducted on the island. They made the intention to start a consortium to find new ways to implement the technology within their banking structures.

2017

May

Joseph Muscat, the Prime Minister of Malta, drafted a strategy document to entice bitcoin and blockchain commerce into the country. This framework could not have come at a better time, as Malta was beginning to entice U.K. start-ups to begin migrating over to a country with more favorable EU relationships. He stated to a group of government officials in May,

“I understand that regulators are wary of this technology but the fact is that it’s coming. We must be on the frontline in embracing this crucial innovation, and we cannot just wait for others to take action and copy them. We must be the ones the others copy.”

Mr. Muscat is going to be on the right side of history here. Exante, their first bitcoin based project, has ballooned to the eight figures from the appreciation of bitcoin, and are paying their 35% corporate taxes. This type tax revenue for such a small country can really mean something for the services they offer their citizens. I think many world leaders (Singapore for one) are beginning to realize they will have to take on a sales role for the country when it comes to who moves where.

November

The MFSA came out with a report on ICOs and how they will begin regulating primary offerings of digital currencies. This report was not like any other report I have ever seen from a government agency. It simply proposed the regulations they were exploring and had a blank sheet of paper following each section with survey questions about what the reader or stakeholder thought about their ideas. That’s what I call humility! The illustration below highlights how they view the landscape of cryptocurrencies, and how they will interact with it:

Securitized tokens would be regulated under a new law, and utility tokens were to be given more autonomy to conduct business without having to get a financial services license from the FMSA. Their definition of both is as follows,

“‘Securitised tokens’ are defined as those embedding either underlying assets (akin to commodities) or rights (e.g. quasi-equity rights) and effectively refer to those tokens that qualify as financial instruments (for further details please see Section 4 of this Discussion Paper). ‘Utility tokens’ are further defined as those providing either platform/application utility rights or protocol access rights, without any underlying.”

There is no mention of whether the product must be working before the ICO, rather focusing on just the intention of the product itself. This is incredibly important, as many ICOs would struggle to build out a working prototype without funding. There is also not a mention of a token losing its utility status if the company received funding prior to the ICO, which is also a major benefit for VC backed tokens. The next portion of the report was their proposal to draft a “Virtual Currencies Act”, which would be as follows:

“MFSA is proposing that, in order to achieve the objectives of financial regulation, certain VCs and activities pertaining to them would be licenced and regulated under a new legislative framework to be drafted by the MFSA and adopted by the Maltese Parliament, the Malta ‘Virtual Currencies Act’.”

Not as quick to the trigger as Switzerland, but formal definitions of ICOs and cryptocurrencies through legislation would be leaps and bounds ahead of many governments today. The Prime Minister seems to be all hands on deck with this initiative, and wants to make sure that the sales pitch to businesses is clear and thorough.

2018

January

The MFSA came back after releasing their dialogue-seeking report, and said that feedback had been very positive for the regulation of cryptocurrencies. MFSA has even taken a more liberal approach than the banks they supervise. They addressed concerns brought up by banks, such as Maltese Bank of Valetta blocking cryptocurrency transactions from their accounts since late 2017. The MFSA regarded this type of move as “Short-term”, and was the reason why they began to enact definitive regulations so that business could go back to normal.

One of the most frequently brought up topics in their follow-up was “Collective-Investor Schemes”. This would be the European equivalent of trying to set up ETFs/mutual funds/hedge funds that would charge fees in exchange for management of digital assets. While all of us are simply worried about if our coins will exist in a years time, Malta is already trying to focus on what types of fund structures they will allow. Clearly, this is a very forward thinking country that is eagerly trying to become a global digital asset manager.

Let’s check in with their first project back in 2013, Exante. The hedge fund has since opened up an exchange, and is allowing trading pairs for the likes of Litecoin, Ethereum, Ripple, and ZCash. They have been working with regulators since before the blockchain boom began, and the rules are very much influenced by the incumbents. A piece of equity in Exante would be something I would be very interested in buying.

February

The Parliamentary Secretary for the Digital Economy in Malta, Silvio Schembri, excitedly announced the inception of the Malta Digital Innovation Authority. The 3 bills proposed to parliament would be to 1) Establish the DIA, 2) Establish definitions of the different providers under DIA 3) Establish rules and regulations that the DIA would focus on in conjunction with the MFSA. If you read my article on Switzerland, this is very similar to the VQF. An SRO that really has the job of making sure that their economic partners are happy and getting the approvals they need quickly. When asked about the overlying goal of the legislation, Secretary Schembri explained:

“The document put forward for consultation is the base for the creation of a new economic sector that will be a great contribution to Malta’s economic growth. A new industry, potentially as large as the iGaming industry, and capable of creating thousands of new jobs, will compliment and reinforce other sectors and act as a catalyst for the creation or development of new economic sectors such as supply chain management and Fintech.”

For all countries involved in blockchain, it is truly a race to get sticky legislation passed. The more definitive a country can be with their regulation of primary offerings and definitions, the greater chance there will be that an entrepreneur would choose their country, pay their business taxes, and employ their people. This legislation did exactly that.

March

Japanese regulators reached a boiling point with cryptocurrency exchange Binance about not registering with their regulators, the FSA. That registration would cause regulatory scrutiny that would hinder the exchange from being able to offer non-identity verified trading accounts to a global marketplace.

The stakes are high – Binance became the largest cryptocurrency exchange by volume with almost no track record whatsoever. A website handling billions of dollars of daily transactions and holding encrypted currency for millions is a business that stakeholders do not want to alter. It’s popularity is dependent on ease of doing business, and that is the very thing that world powers are trying to limit.

This led Binance to announce that they were packing their bags, and heading for Malta. With some estimates saying they plan to hire 200 people on the island, this was welcomed news by the Prime Minister. Mr. Muscat even tweeted out his warm welcome to the company:

“Welcome to @binance. We aim to be the global trailblazers in the regulation of blockchain-based businesses and the jurisdiction of quality and choice for world class fintech companies -JM”

This is unprecedented by a country. Binance is a unique website that wants decentralization to take true form. They have resisted the changes that others have demanded, and remained an open marketplace for anyone on earth. Malta, a tiny EU country, welcomed them with open arms. This is truly an amazing feat for the country, as there is a very lucrative outcome for all involved if Malta can properly handle this relationship. The move has not yet taken place, but it is something I actively encourage all to monitor.

Conclusion

Malta is the best of all worlds. Thinking from an American perspective, 88% of the country speaks English. Their government most likely was not briefed on cryptocurrency in 2013, yet they were willing to give things a try, and then modify their process as time went on.

The results are blinding. Their first digital asset hedge fund has grown into a multi-million dollar exchange, ICOs are beginning to consult with Maltese lawyers, and the largest cryptocurrency exchange with goals of complete decentralization has been welcomed by the Prime Minister himself. If we take out the words blockchain and cryptocurrency, Malta has brought jobs, taxes, and infrastructural development to their tiny island. Time will tell that their early decisions will yield truly remarkable results, especially if Binance is allowed to grow autonomously.

So after my research, my hypothetical choices so far are Singapore, Switzerland, and Malta. Of the three, Malta is right in the middle. Legal/lawyer fees for an ICO offering I’ve estimated to be around $20,000, which is going to be cheaper than the other two countries. However, the true asset is their size. The MFSA can have face-to-face conversations with every single person who does business in the country, and the government is fully on board to test anything that may help them become wealthier.

The process to license and launch an ICO out of Malta would be months shorter than it would be if you were trying to launch out of a larger, more bureaucratic country. In a coin-eat-coin world, cost and speed is everything. After you’ve paid bottom dollar to launch, you are right across the street from the largest exchange in the world. I couldn’t possibly think of a bigger asset than that.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell cryptocurrency. We have seen some of the worst volatility in recent weeks, and trading into this type of market is a gigantic risk. I would encourage all to take a step back, and watch prices. I have never felt better about my investments simply because I watch the Top 25 market cap coins diligently, and wait. I wish you the best of luck- @raijincrypto

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Sources

http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8840

https://www.financemalta.org/publications/articles-interviews/articles-and-interviews-detail/malta-digital-innovation-authority-unveiled-2018/

https://www.financemalta.org/sections/banking/regulation-legislation/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonmatonis/2013/03/08/first-bitcoin-hedge-fund-launches-from-malta/#40f57bce3e1e

https://www.mfsa.com.mt/pages/readfile.aspx?f=/files/…/2017/20171130…pdf

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
6 votes, average: 4.83 out of 56 votes, average: 4.83 out of 56 votes, average: 4.83 out of 56 votes, average: 4.83 out of 56 votes, average: 4.83 out of 5 (6 votes, average: 4.83 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.4 stars on average, based on 27 rated postsMythological God of Lightning. Cryptocurrency/Blockchain writer, evangelist, and friend. May the odds be ever in our favor.




Feedback or Requests?

Market Overview

Comparing Nasdaq and Bitcoin: What Lessons Can We Learn?

Published

on

Bubbles

Over the past few months, lots of people have talked about the similarities between the .com bubble in the early 2000s and the bitcoin market today. It seems that the further down the bitcoin market goes; the more people are using this analogue to help them stay in the game for the long-run.

One of the influential people in the crypto space who often refers to this comparison is Teeka Tiwari at Palm Beach Research Group. While he usually compares the Nasdaq during the late 1990s with the total cryptocurrency market cap, we are here going to compare the Nasdaq during that same period with the market for bitcoin specifically.

Nasdaq vs Bitcoin

In the image above, the top chart is a weekly chart of bitcoin, while the bottom chart is a monthly chart of the Nasdaq 100 Index from 1989 to 2004.

As we all know, the crypto market tends to behave like the stock market on steroids. Moves are larger, and trends change faster in crypto compared to in stocks. It therefore makes more sense to compare these two charts using different timeframes, which is why I have chosen the monthly chart for Nasdaq while bitcoin is represented with a weekly chart.

There are a few interesting things to take note of regarding this comparison:

The Nasdaq found support following the crash in 2000 and 2001, and has later gained more than 600%. The Nasdaq has, in other words, returned more than three times as much for investors than the broader S&P500 index has done.

One explanation for why all financial bubbles have so much in common is that the one thing that causes them – human fear and greed – never changes.

What was different during the dot-com bubble back in the early 2000s was that communication was slow and ineffective compared to the high-speed Internet connections we have today on our phones and laptops. This is one of the reasons why it took the Nasdaq a few years to rise 1,700%, while bitcoin managed to achieve the same return in just a few months.

Similarly, it took the Nasdaq 30 months to fall 78%, while bitcoin lost 70% in just one and a half month.

Another thing both markets have had in common is that when they were down 70% from the top, many people completely lost faith in the future of these markets.

It has been pointed out by observers that even the arguments these people used against investing in the said markets were largely the same: No underlying value, too much volatility, too much regulations/lack of regulations/bad regulations, lack of social responsibility from the market actors, etc.

In hindsight, it has become clear that only the investors who had the mental clarity to ignore all this noise during the early 2000s were able to catch the 600% move that followed in the Nasdaq.

Diversification saved investors

When we are talking about ignoring noise and riding out the storm, let’s not forget that many of the companies that made up the Nasdaq in the early 2000s did eventually go out of business. Betting everything on a single company, in many cases, ended up being a catastrophe for the investor, despite the fact that the sector as a whole did incredibly well. This really made the benefit of diversification clear to everyone.

We can assume that the same is true for the cryptocurrencies of today. Some will emerge and become hugely successful, while others will slowly but steadily decrease in value and become irrelevant. Which ones they are is extremely difficult to tell at this early stage, but the lesson to be learned is clear: Diversification may be the only free lunch we will ever get in the world.

Featured image from Pixabay.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
4 votes, average: 5.00 out of 54 votes, average: 5.00 out of 54 votes, average: 5.00 out of 54 votes, average: 5.00 out of 54 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5 (4 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.3 stars on average, based on 34 rated postsFredrik Vold is an entrepreneur, financial writer, and technical analysis enthusiast. He has been working and traveling in Asia for several years, and is currently based out of Beijing, China. He closely follows stocks, forex and cryptocurrencies, and is always looking for the next great alternative investment opportunity.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Op-Ed

Is Manipulation Behind Bitcoin Cash’s Absurd Rally?

Published

on

Although you wouldn’t know it by today’s prices, bitcoin cash (BCH) has topped the crypto market leader board this month. The digital currency more than doubled over the span of 18 days, and in doing so far outpaced the broader market. But a closer examination of the value drivers suggest manipulation could be partly responsible for the rally.

As a reminder, the author has no vested interest in smearing BCH as I believe it to be one of the more advantageous coins on the market today. That said, the circumstances surrounding the most recent rally are peculiar to say the least.

What’s Up with Bitcoin.com?

A Hacked user informed me earlier this week that Bitcoin.com has been using the “BCH” ticker next to the word “bitcoin”. Normally, the ticker “BTC” is reserved for bitcoin, which is the original blockchain we all know about. Instead, the website quotes “BTC” next to the term “bitcoin core”.

In other words, BCH is quoted next to bitcoin and BTC is referred to as bitcoin core. See here for yourself:

 

For most readers of Hacked, the distinction is easily discernible, but for new traders the difference isn’t easily gauged.

The first question I have is, how many people bought bitcoin (BCH) thinking they were receiving actual bitcoin (BTC)?

Bitcoin.com describes itself as the “premier source for everything bitcoin.” Although the website doesn’t appear to offer a full-fledged trading platform, users can purchase bitcoin and bitcoin cash using the following link.

It is unclear how long the website has been referring to BCH as bitcoin. For those of us who’ve been following the market for some time, the way BTC and BCH are quoted is certainly strange.

Antpool

A large cryptocurrency mining group by the name of Antpool has also been accused of pumping BCH in recent weeks. The pool announced about six days ago that it is responsible for confirming more than 8% of all bitcoin cash transactions. In addition to confirming those, Antpool is also said to be burning BCH on a daily basis in order to reduce supply and boost prices.

Of course, crypto pumps do not require such elaborate setups to achieve their goals. Pump-and-dumps can be orchestrated rather easily through a chat group on social media. But Antpool does have a large and privileged position in the BCH ecosystem, which has raised suspicion over its recent actions.

Bitcoin Cash is Overbought, According to Tom Lee

Fundstrat’s Tom Lee recently weighed in on the bitcoin cash phenomenon, concluding that the cryptocurrency was overbought. In his view, investors should stick with bitcoin if they had a choice between Core and Cash.

In a segment on CNBC’s Fast Money, Lee said:

“I prefer not to pick winners and losers when we’re looking at cryptocurrencies like bitcoin/bitcoin Cash… Both have merits but if I was putting new money to work today… I would be a lot more interested in buying a lagger that could attract inflows rather than something that’s potentially overbought.”

Bitcoin cash added around $1,000 to its value between Apr. 6 and 23, with prices peaking near $1,600. The cryptocurrency corrected sharply lower on Wednesday and was still declining as of Thursday’s early-morning session. At the time of writing, BCH/USD was down 4.6% at $1,268.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
8 votes, average: 4.13 out of 58 votes, average: 4.13 out of 58 votes, average: 4.13 out of 58 votes, average: 4.13 out of 58 votes, average: 4.13 out of 5 (8 votes, average: 4.13 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.6 stars on average, based on 461 rated postsSam Bourgi is Chief Editor to Hacked.com, where he specializes in cryptocurrency, economics and the broader financial markets. Sam has nearly eight years of progressive experience as an analyst, writer and financial market commentator where he has contributed to the world's foremost newscasts.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Decentralization

JP Morgan’s Surprise Cryptocurrency Fees are a Reminder of Why Decentralization Is Sorely Needed

Published

on

JP Morgan Chase & Co has been hit with a class-action lawsuit by cryptocurrency traders over allegations of unannounced fees and higher interest rates on purchases of digital currencies. Though the allegations have not been proven, extra fees are a tactic routinely employed by traditional banking institutions. In the case of JP Morgan, this has karma written all over it given the way its chief executive has ridiculed digital assets by associating them with fraud.

Class Action Lawsuit

Traders from across the United States are seeking statutory damages of $1 million for unannounced interest charges and fees on cryptocurrency transactions between January and February of this year. The named plaintiff in the lawsuit is Brady Tucker, an Idaho resident who paid a total of $163.91 in fees and surprise interest charges over a six-day stretch.

According to information obtained by Reuters, the lawsuit accuses the bank of violating the U.S. Truth in Lending Act, a piece of legislation that requires credit card issuers to inform customers in writing of any notable change in fees.

The lawsuit asserts that Tucker tried to resolve the dispute by calling Chase’s customer support service directly. His request was turned down, prompting him to seek legal help. According to Bloomberg, the case in question is Tucker v. Chase Bank USA NA, 18-cv-3155, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

The Growing Case for Decentralization

Depending on who you ask, the allegations against JP Morgan are akin to cryptocurrency fraud not unlike the kind Jamie Dimon talked about while ridiculing bitcoin. But the irony in Dimon’s comments extend far beyond Chase’s latest dealings.

As the actions of Chase bank and other financial institutions have clearly demonstrated over the years, those who control the size and growth rate of fiat money cannot be trusted to do the right thing. As Nassim Taleb argues in The Black Swan, banks have a tendency of losing as much money as they make in the long run due to shady business practices and high-risk ventures. Decisions like these are easy when you are Too Big to Fail.

Decentralization, like the kind advocated by blockchain startups and cryptocurrencies, allows users to trade directly with each other without having to go through a (predatory) middleman. Decentralized systems not only help participants avoid unnecessary fees, red tape and other forms of unwanted intervention, they are virtually impossible to shut down. In this vein, decentralized currencies give people a fighting chance in their battle against never-ending inflation. As we’ve argued before, this is not only a prudent fight, but a noble one as well.

Cryptocurrencies that rely on decentralization offer society a unique value proposition unlike anything we’ve seen in recent history. What’s more, their adoption is not contingent upon us leaving the realm of traditional finance – at least, not yet. That’s because cryptocurrency started off as an obscure and esoteric asset class but has since become a value store for investors. Tomorrow, it will become a viable medium of exchange accepted worldwide.

That said, we are still in the very early days of the crypto revolution and it may be a while still before we can conclusively prove people like Dimon wrong. But crypto backers and investors should take comfort in knowing that big banks rarely lead in disruption these days. They have the resources to play catch-up, which they are clearly doing with blockchain.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.6 stars on average, based on 461 rated postsSam Bourgi is Chief Editor to Hacked.com, where he specializes in cryptocurrency, economics and the broader financial markets. Sam has nearly eight years of progressive experience as an analyst, writer and financial market commentator where he has contributed to the world's foremost newscasts.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

11 of 15 Seats Available

Learn more here.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending