Connect with us

ICO

ICO Analysis: Rivetz International (RvT)

Published

on

If you don’t like reading, this presentation by Rivet CEO Steven Sprague gives a pretty good overview of what Rivet is in the following video:

Rivetz International is focused on data integrity and security at the device level. They believe that a big problem with most cryptocurrency implementations is the inability to verify the intent of the user. We can know that the user sent a transaction, but we cannot know if they intended to do so. Rivetz expands the notion of the Trusted Execution Environment from something programmers should be aware of to something that all applications will be forced to reconcile. To do this, they want to build a “Global Attestation and Identity Network.”

The whitepaper is really disorderly. There seem to be a lot of recognizable names thrown in purely for that reason. After ten pages, we’re still overall confused as to what this thing is meant to do.

RvT tokens provide a new approach in the blockchain market designed to assure attestation and policy are fully integrated into the process. The TEE provides the policy enforcement on the device to assure the rules are followed. The processing of the token is designed to verify the integrity of the TEE assuring the poli cy was in place. It is a symbiotic linkage that is intended to embed the info mation necessary to prove that a known device in a known condition with a known user produced a provable instruction with strong privacy controls. A primary goal is that privacy is protected and all device – controlled transactions will only occur between parties known to the owner of the device. The identity information is tokenized in order to seek to assure tracking of transactions on a chain is not bound to a specific service. However, the RvT token will require that all parties are identified to the owner of the device reducing the risk that malware can extract value from the automated systems.

What the above means is that a device which is enabled with RvT technology simply cannot take certain actions without being legitimately in tune with device owner policy and network security checks. At a consumer level, this all seems too complex, but as investors we have to consider that there are things in here that other firms will find more useful than we can imagine from our standing. For instance, banks could utilize a public and secure network like RvT to ensure that some elements of their security are actually veritable and within the control of the user. Third-party applications of either a similar concept or implementations based on RvT are bound to happen as the Internet of Things makes hardware security more commonplace. Utilizing “jails” in computer architecture for the execution of highly sensitive instructions is a sensible first step in software design, regardless of advances in software-based solutions.

When an RvT-enabled device comes online, it is run through a series of checks which generate a “health” certificate. “The Cybercontrols Marketplace executes an owner-provided script to validate any external controls, Enterprise or cloud.” This means that you could have some document or domain somewhere that must be in exactly the same state it was in when you last touched it, or anything you want. The script is provided to the Cybercontrols Marketplace before the provider is allowed to use the ecosystem, so its security is also important, but it could be a powerful way to use the software in surprising ways. For instance, a script could notify you that your device was at this particular GPS location if a check didn’t pass. It could delete certain records, or automatically remove all access to the device. All of this can be more secure and less expensive than the options offered by Google and Apple today. There are some things which should not be left in walled gardens, owned by private companies. Security protocols and networking protocols in general are one of these things. Better security happens when certain things become impossible.

We also are introduced to a concept of “health checks” in Rivet. Health checks are a bit of a murky area for this writer, but essentially a set of tests are determined externally and internally, by vendor and user, to determine if a device is in a “healthy” state to conduct certain types of activities. While the technical details are interesting, from an investor perspective these should be more organized for our digestion. No matter, we are able to come up with this determination:

So what Rivet is building could be transformative or it could be too big to sail.

Huge Problem, Huge Potential

According to the Rivet whitepaper, $3 trillion in costs were generated in 2015 by cybersecurity compromises. They cite Cybersecurity Ventures for this figure, who also say it will double in 2017. Cybersecurity Ventures is a more recent effort by PeopleComm, the earliest rendition of LinkedIn for the technology industry. We checked these numbers, and what we found were a bit different. An ironic thing to note about Cybersecurity Ventures, on the surface, is that they do not even use the Secure Site Layer protocol:

Nevertheless, what their report actually says is the following:

Cybersecurity Ventures predicts cybercrime will continue rising and cost businesses globally more than $6 trillion annually by 2021. The estimate is based on historical cybercrime figures including recent year-over-year growth, a dramatic increase in hostile nation state sponsored and organized crime gang hacking activities, a cyber attack surface which will be an order of magnitude greater than it is today, and the cyber defenses expected to be pitted against hackers and cybercriminals over that time.

It’s not overly important, but it does lead one to wonder why the information was misused in the Rivet whitepaper, particularly in the “executive summary” section:

As you can see, on your first read it’s easy to think they’re saying $6 trillion per year. Let’s limit our enthusiasm for Cybersecurity Venture’s predictions, in any case – forecasting a strong market for cybersecurity is sort of in their job description. Let’s assume they are 90% over-estimating: that is still $600 billion in damages over a few years, with $100 billion being invested for security efforts. It does seem evident that with that much loot flying around, innovative ideas such as Rivet are going to rise to the top of the pile and see some engagement. Whether they are the right people for the job is really hard to pin down and perhaps outside the scope of these analyses, but for the reader’s benefit, we can review the people working on the project.

The Rivet Token

The rivet token itself will be used to bind devices to the global attestation network. As always, their acquisition is the cost of admission into the network. Envision firms buying up large blocks and reselling access. 200 million Rivets will be issued starting today but only 70 million are going to be available for sale, with another 70 million locked down for “future use.”

The article should almost end here. As regards the token sale economics, they are doing it all wrong. Too much trust is forced to be left in their hands. While the value of the token should theoretically be higher since it will be more scarce, this metric is generally best applied to things with already-established value.

Rivetz International

The company is headed by Steven Sprague and Michael Sprague, relation unclear. Michael acts as Chief Technology Officer and Steven acts as CEO. You can see Steven giving a speech at the top of this article.

In charge of engineering, they’ve got Sean Gilligan. According to his own tagline, “as an independent consultant and principal at Open Systems Development, Sean built networking and systems software products for companies such as Apple, 3Com, Novell, Silicon Graphics, and SUN Microsystems.” Hardly a big name left out of that. One guesses he forgot Google, Amazon, and Microsoft. Luckily, it’s not bullcrap. Gilligan’s Github profile at least vindicates that he is an active developer. While there is valid criticism in using such a metric to determine someone’s qualifications, when it’s evident, it’s evidence.

In concert with Greg Laun and Mark Hoblit, the Spragues apparently believe, Gilligan will build a team that will radically, transformatively change security in electronic devices and finance.

The Verdict

But, will they? The safe bet here seems to be: “wait and see.” Aside from red flags like the “pre-sale available” for those willing to spend “150 Eth” or more, and without regard for anything the firm has done, seen, or built, what you’re going to run into is a disparate industry which is eager to provide 100 solutions to the same problem. Rivet will be just one of them, and, to be very honest, probably not a very successful one. As such, either buy little or buy late.

Risk

The battle hardened author gets a bad feeling about the complexity of this idea. Not everything is solved through crowdfunding research. Successfully implementing this system seems like more work than anyone is predicting. We can understand that these things also happen organically, but there is likely to be a lot more momentum behind such organic efforts, ie, this sort of standard is the sort of thing that will be best done by a consortium of companies who will all benefit.

The R3 Blockchain Consortium would seem a good fit both for funding this company and for implementing its technology, rather than thousands of individual investors who likely do not understanding what they are funding. No one seems to question how Rivets play into R3’s “Corda” project. Of course, we can’t stop anyone from investing, and we can’t stop anyone from trying, we can merely point out that there appear to be far more legitimate, big-handed efforts in relatively congruent areas of thought already.

Growth Potential

There’s probably a lot more to this science project than meets the eye, and like as not, opportunities for profit will arise which surprise everyone.

Disposition

However, the long-term value of RvT tokens is in the balance here, and we must suggest that such a value is not very high. Rivetz receives a 5.4 on a scale of 0 to 10 for its technical aptitude alone. The token itself loses 2 points from this score, landing it at 3.4. It would receive a higher rating if it could be reasonably believed that this token will be in hot demand sometime in the next 6 to 24 months, but there is no reason to believe that from here.

We will check in on them in February, after which they say on page 21, “the majority of the Blockchain and token based projects will benefit from integration with Rivetz capabilities.” On their FAQ page, they also say that by February: “Developer tools and the Rivetz 2 FA capability are expected to be delivered in the fall, and a machine multisig by the end of the year. We have a number of existing technology partners. ”

Investment Details

Rivetz opens its public sale today. Be sure to read all terms and conditions if you’ve got additional information the author hasn’t or just have a long-term good feeling about them. Clear details as to pricing and availability have not been made available at time of writing:

The correct address to access is https://rivetzintl.com/sale.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

5 stars on average, based on 2 rated postsP. H. Madore has covered the cryptocurrency beat over the course of hundreds of articles for Hacked's sister site, CryptoCoinsNews, as well as some of her competitors. He is a major contributing developer to the Woodcoin project, and has made technical contributions on a number of other cryptocurrency projects. In spare time, he recently began a more personalized, weekly newsletter at http://ico.phm.link




Feedback or Requests?

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

ICO

ICO Analysis: BitTorrent Token

Published

on

Blockchain company TRON made waves back in June 2018, when it was announced that TRON was acquiring BitTorrent, the company responsible for the development of the immensely popular file-sharing protocol BitTorrent, for $140m.

The BitTorrent protocol is a pioneer in the decentralized networks space and allows for the downloading and uploading of files from/to various hosts rather than a single server.

Perhaps the most popular or well-known use of the protocol is torrenting, which is often used to share copyrighted content like movies and music illegally.

Regardless of how the protocol is used, one can’t deny the popularity of the protocol.

According to BitTorrent (the company), the protocol is used by more than 170 million people every month and is responsible for as much as 40% of the world’s daily Internet traffic.

However, while BitTorrent is immensely popular, the company behind the protocol has struggled to generate revenue.

Thus, the acquisition comes as a break for the struggling company and might prove to be very strategic for TRON, as they gain access to a very large user base and more importantly (in the author’s view), a team of developers that is top of its class when it comes to developing decentralized networks.

Under the new leadership, BitTorrent is launching a token (BTT) to tokenize what is perhaps the world’s biggest, decentralized file sharing protocol.

Token

According to the BTT whitepaper, BTT will incentivize users to offer infrastructure services, such as seeding or hosting files, in return for BTT.

To validate this concept, BitTorrent is launching something called BitTorrent Speed (release date set for Q2 2019), which will enable faster downloads for users who choose to pay file seeders in BTT.

Thus, downloaders (“leechers”) will benefit from faster downloads via prioritized resource allocation, while seeders or hosters will benefit from payment in exchange for providing bandwidth services to the network.

It’s hoped that this will incentivize downloaders (who become seeders when they start to download a file) to keep seeding, even after their download is finished, a problem that has been present since the inception of the BitTorrent protocol.

While BitTorrent Speed is the first initial experiment when it comes to tokenizing the BitTorrent protocol, the team behind BTT envisions more generalized applications of this tokenization model (with potentially more to come):

  1. General decentralized mass distribution of content that might be subject to attack like censorships. With the decentralized and large network effects of the BitTorrent Protocol, not only do content creators not have to worry about hosting their content on one provider, but performance issues will also be of less worry, as the BitTorrent protocol has been proven to be able to handle large amounts of download requests, with organizations like Facebook and Twitter even using the technology to distribute updates to their servers.
  2. Decentralized storage services, where users pay for storage over time
  3. Decentralized proxying services, where users pay to retrieve content by URL (use cases may include content that might be subject to IP-based controls, highly mobile applications, and users with intermittent Internet connectivity, such as mobile users on WiFi, requesting content in chunks vs. in a complete form)

BTT-based transactions will be confirmed via blockchain technology to prevent fraud.

The total supply of BTT will be 990,000,000,000 (990 billion) BTT.

The tokens will be allocated as follows.

  • TRON Foundation (20%)
  • BitTorrent Ecosystem (19.9%)
  • Team (19%)
  • TRON Airdrop, or allocation for holders of Tron’s cryptocurrency (TRX) (10.1%)
  • BitTorrent Airdrop, or allocation for BitTorrent client users for client install and onboarding (10%)
  • Seed investors (9%)
  • Public sale (6%)
  • Partnerships (4%)
  • Private sale (2%)

The public token sale, which starts at 15:00 UTC, January 28th, 2019 is structured as follows.

  • $7.2m USD hard cap (sale finishes when hard cap is reached or at 15:00 UTC, February 3rd, 2019)
  • Individual cap of $20k USD
  • 59.4 billion BTT for sale (6% of total token supply)
  • No vesting or lockup
  • 40% of tokens for sale in BNB, 60% for sale in TRX
  • Tokens distributed within 15 days of token sale conclusion

Team

The team behind BTT is the team behind BitTorrent, which as explained, is a massively popular decentralized file sharing protocol, and the team behind Tron, a highly popular blockchain-based project, whose cryptocurrency TRX, is ranked #9 by market capitalization as of writing (Coinmarketcap).

Verdict

Below is a breakdown of the risks and growth potential of BitTorrent Token (BTT).

Risks

  • Would people actually pay for faster torrent downloads (initial use case for BTT, which will serve as a way to validate or invalidate the notion of tokenizing the BitTorrent protocol)? Torrents are known for enabling free downloading of content like movies and music. If users really wanted to pay for torrents, it’s possible that they would have already migrated to services like streaming via Netflix and Spotify. Moreover, BitTorrent users are not mandated to participate in BitTorrent Speed. (-0.5)
  • There is a lot of legal controversy surrounding the use of BitTorrent – the protocol itself is legal; however, as mentioned, there are many illicit uses of it, such as the sharing of copyrighted content. While it’s unlikely that the team behind BTT would get into any sort of trouble, it’s possible that users might be turned off by negative press or attention about illicit use and resulting legal disputes. (-0.5)
  • The team is highly experienced at building and maintaining decentralized network infrastructure (BitTorrent) and building popular blockchain-based solutions (TRON). However, competitors like Upfiring have already launched beta products, with decent feedback on places like Reddit. (-0.5)
  • Although the BitTorrent and TRON teams have built large-scale decentralized network infrastructure, it will be difficult to build a blockchain that can handle the massive throughput of the BitTorrent network. (-0.5)
  • Initial circulating supply is only 9% but will near 80% within 3.5 years, which means that the BTT token will face incredible inflationary pressure (-2)
  • Seed and private investors got BTT at a ~68% bonus (relative to public sale price) and don’t have a lockup (though tokens are vested over a year). (-0.5)
  • No details on lockups and/or vesting for team tokens. (-0.5)

Growth Potential

  • BitTorrent is about as legitimate as they come for proven examples of successful decentralized networks. (+2)
  • The tokenization of BitTorrent’s protocol could prove to be very interesting, and it’s possible that content creators and other individuals and groups that wish to distribute files could migrate to the protocol in order to circumvent the various problems associated with going through more centralized alternatives, such as app stores, music distribution platforms, and more. (+2)
  • If tokenization via BTT takes off due to the combination of the already large network effects of BitTorrent and the validation of the BTT tokenization model, it’s very possible that BTT might be covered in mainstream media outlets, as an example of a cryptocurrency project that has “mainstream adoption”. (+1)
  • The sale will be taking place on Binance’s Launchpad platform for ICOs, which provides BTT with a ready base of potential investors who can invest easily from Binance’s platform. (+1)
  • Although competitors like Upfiring are up and running, the team, as mentioned, has a great track record in building decentralized networks (BitTorrent and TRON). (+2)
  • Say what you want about Justin Sun and TRON, but no one can deny that Justin Sun and TRON are marketing wizards, who are highly capable of building investor interest in blockchain projects. During the bull run of late 2017~early 2018, TRX multiplied in price by over 100 times (as measured in USD), and the TRON community continues to be vibrant. (+2)

Disposition

BitTorrent Token will prove to be an interesting experiment for the future of decentralized technology. The team is combining an already large decentralized network (the BitTorrent protocol) with the idea of tokenization and crypto-economics. However, in terms of investing in the token sale, competitors, current blockchain technology limitations, inflationary pressure, more favorable terms for early investors, opacity regarding team tokens, and general lack of interest in ICOs amidst a bear market make BTT ICO participation a questionable proposition. Nevertheless, the sheer potential of leveraging BitTorrent’s network in a cryptocurrency project as well as the team’s experience in building decentralized networks and marketing make BTT a token to keep an eye on. BitTorrent Token receives a 5/10.

Investment Details

  • Type: TRC10 – Utility
  • Symbol: BTT
  • Platform: TRON
  • Crowdsale: January 28th, 2019 at 15:00 UTC
  • Minimum Investment: Unspecified
  • Price: 1 BTT = .00012 USD (prices in BNB and TRX set on day of token sale)
  • Hard Cap: $7.2m
  • Payments Accepted: TRX, BNB
  • Restricted from Participating: China, USA, Afghanistan, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Burundi, Central African Republic, Cote d’Ivoire, Cuba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Myanmar, North Korea, Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), Serbia, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, Venezuela, Yemen, and Zimbabwe

For More Information

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.8 stars on average, based on 37 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

ICO

ICO Analysis: Devv

Published

on

One of the major issues with blockchain technology is that the underlying platforms are unable to adequately service high amounts of usage without compromising on speed and transaction costs (“the scalability problem”).

In fact, many see this as one of the foremost obstacles for blockchain to overcome in order to achieve widespread adoption and become the basis for a new and decentralized Internet.

Various projects have sprung up and are in the works with the focus of tackling the scalability issue.

Devvio is yet another contender to step into the arena for scalable platforms and has developed a blockchain protocol called Devv that claims to address blockchain’s major issues including scalability as well as fraud, loss, theft, privacy and stability.

While seasoned ICO investors might have heard this pitch one too many times, Devv has processed over 1 million transactions per second (tps) on-chain and is currently benchmarking at over 8 million tps on-chain, the results of which can be seen here. Those would like to delve further into Devv’s technology can check out the Devv whitepaper and Devv Github.

By solving the aforementioned issues of scalability, fraud, loss, theft, privacy and stability, Devvio believes that their cryptocurrency has the potential to really grow into the preferred way for instant value exchange worldwide.

Moreover, similar to platforms, such as Ethereum and EOS, developers can build Dapps on Devv but not be limited by high fees, low transaction throughput, and sub-par security at scale.

Some use cases the Devvio team foresees for Devv include the following:

Financial Services

Using Devv to manage exchange, hedging, payments, and repatriation of funds.

Data

Using Devv to manage sensitive data in a highly secure environment.

Logistics

Track and manage goods as well as reduce traditional insurance and logistics costs.

Token

Devv’s token will be used to enable value and asset exchange similar to other cryptocurrencies and tokens.

Devvio will initially issue ERC-20 tokens to investors before ERC-20 tokens are swapped for native Devv tokens at a 1:1 ratio.

Devv tokens (total supply 500m tokens) will be allocated as follows.

  • 30% token sale (150m tokens)
  • 30% company reserve (150m tokens)
  • 20% partners and acquisitions (100m tokens)
  • 15% founders and partners (75m tokens)
  • 4% advisors (20m tokens)
  • 1% bounties and community (5m tokens)

According to the Devv whitepaper, token sale proceeds will be used in the following manner (assuming the hard cap of $18m is met):

  • 15% technical development
  • 12% Devvio operations
  • 12% business development
  • 18% Intellectual property development, licensing, and enforcement
  • 20% marketing
  • 8% supporting technologies
  • 15% token sale fees

The amount of Devv tokens issued to investors will vary depending on how much is raised during the token offering. For instance, if the hard cap of $18m is met, token purchasers will receive 150m tokens as mentioned.

2% of Founder, Partner, and Advisor tokens will be available upon the Token Generation Event (TGE) and 98% will be vested with a cliff of 1 year at a rate of 1/8th each quarter for 2 years (after the initial 1 year lockup period).

Team

Devvio team members include the following:

CEO Tom Anderson – Anderson was the founder of Novint Technologies, a robotics company which made the first 3d touch device for consumers. Anderson is considered a pioneer in haptic technology (integrating the sense of touch into computers and virtual reality). Novint raised over $30m, licensed game development worth tens of millions of dollars, and more before its patents were sold to Facebook.

Advisors

Tokenmarket – well-known token sale organizer that has helped ICO clients, such as Civic, Storj, and Dent.

More team members and advisors are listed on Devvio’s team page.

Verdict

Below is a breakdown of the risks and growth potential of Devv.

Risks

  • Like many projects – not fully released. First stable release of Devv blockchain is set for Q1/Q2 2019.
  • For a highly ambitious blockchain platform (“solving” scalability, fraud, loss, theft, privacy and stability at the same time), no one on the team has standout experience working on similar projects.
  • Token allocation for token sale could be higher.
  • Though the token sale date hasn’t been specified, interest on social platforms thus far seems relatively low for a project of its scope (e.g. ~2.8k Telegram channel members and ~1k Twitter followers as of writing).

Growth Potential

  • Testnet available and not a complete whitepaper/vaporware project like many ICOs.
  • Team has had business success in other endeavors (e.g. Novint).
  • According to the Devv FAQ (“Do you have any patents”), the team has patented their ideas to build somewhat of a protective moat.
  • Instead of accepting that thefts occur in the blockchain/cryptocurrency space like most other projects, Devv has an optional transaction method (similar to credit card chargebacks) called DevvProtect. Optional DevvProtect wallets guard against common issues like stolen private keys and lack of asset transferal upon events, such as a token holder’s death. These are definitely interesting features that would probably be of interest to businesses, Devv’s intended audience.

Disposition

Although jaded ICO investors are probably tired of hearing about platforms that will solve scalability among other blockchain technology obstacles, Devvio’s Devv blockchain does show promise with its benchmarking of 8 million tps and testnet available for use. This in addition to the team’s business experience, focus on patents, and innovative features like optional transactions make the project one to keep an eye on as long as they can deliver technically and garner adequate community interest once the ICO date is announced. Devv receives a 7/10.

Investment Details

  • Type: ERC20 – Utility then Native
  • Symbol: DEVV
  • Platform: Ethereum then Native
  • Crowdsale: TBA
  • Minimum Investment: Unspecified
  • Price: Unspecified
  • Hard Cap: $18m
  • Payments Accepted: Unspecified, presumably ETH
  • Restricted from Participating: Unspecified

For More Information

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 52 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.8 stars on average, based on 37 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

ICO

ICO Analysis: Fieldcoin

Published

on

Fieldcoin is an agribusiness crowdfunding platform that enables anyone to buy, sell, rent, and manage farmland from anywhere in the world. Using IoT, smart contracts, and other agribusiness technology, token holders will form a DAC (Decentralised Autonomous Community) and vote on every aspect of their chosen agribusiness from seed to table.

“Fieldcoin’s mission is to bring the blockchain technology to land property transactions and agricultural crowdfunding projects while creating a stable transaction instrument easing the process of land and agribusiness acquisition.”

Fieldcoin will offer access to LANDS Management Services. Investors will be able to buy/sell/manage physical land of different sizes and budgets at an attractive price compared to the market value.

The company claims to:

  • Brings liquidity to the agricultural industry
  • The token is backed by land.
  • Decentralize the highly centralized agriculture market
  • Track the origin of food products.
  • Manage the way the food is grown (pesticides or organic)

Along with the above highlights, Fieldcoin’s “trade-back token” guarantees an 80% ratio on the value of your token to the assets in the ecosystem and the possibility of claiming your assets in physical property at a certain rate under the market price.

In the Fieldcoin ecosystem, there are 2 levels of ownership: “Off-chain,” which is to comply with national regulations and “On-chain,” which is recorded and transacted on the blockchain.

  • Off-chain: Fieldcoin Ltd or a third party company DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) owns the property titles recorded in the national land registry. The token holder owns a share of the company representing the specific land acquired on the platform.
  • On-chain: Fieldcoin Ltd creates a unique token with a unique number representing a specific property called LANDS (ERC721). The LANDS token represents the ownership of the property and can be exchanged on the Fieldcoin platform using the Blockchain.

The FCO will start April 2nd, 2019.

FCO means Field Coin Offering. It’s like any ICO, users buy (FLC) ERC20 Utility tokens which are used to acquire non-fungible tokens (ERC721), which represent a particular agricultural property. “The acquisition of NFT tokens during the ICO makes the Field Coin Offering unique and offers a strong advantage to investors that are able to test the platform and own tangible assets during the Coin Offering.”

Token

FLC is an ERC20-based utility token distributed during the FCO. The token is used as a currency to buy land, services and crowdfund agricultural projects on the platform.

LANDS is an ERC721-based token received after buying a specific land property through our platform, representing land ownership and storing the data of your property. LANDS are also available for purchase during the FCO.

According to the company, trade-back token is “Token holders will buy land on Fieldcoin’s platform and pay the full market price displayed on the website. They will be credited with a coupon to buy land for later purchases. The value of the voucher corresponds to the difference between the price drop of the token under the 80% threshold and the actual value of assets in Fieldcoin’s Ecosystem. The coupon can be applied to available properties sold by Fieldcoin Ltd on the platform.”

Distribution:

  • Private Sale 2%
  • FCO 60%
  • Token Bonuses 17%
  • Reserves 10%
  • Team 9%
  • Bounty 2%

Allocation of funds:

  • 60% Purchase of Physical Land
  • 15% Agribusiness Development
  • 10% IT
  • 7% Legal
  • 6% Marketing
  • 1% Reserve Fund
  • 1% Social and Rural Development

Ecosystem asset reallocation:

  • 85% Land Recapitalization
  • 9% Business Operations
  • 5% IT Development
  • 1% Participation in Communities

Team

The Fieldcoin project is governed and supervised by Fieldcoin Ltd, registered in London. The team members are from France, Canada, USA, India, Belgium, Italy, the UK, Pakistan and China. There are over 25 team members including the advisors.

Marc Couzic is the  Founder/CEO.  He is a freelance commodities and crypto trader since 2013 and has been a “Contributor” to 3 blockchain projects this past year; Experty.io, Kart Block, and Magna Numeris.

Alexandre Palubniak is a Web Project Manager from France. He has spent 7 years as a freelance “Director Artistique”.

Jeremie Joncas is a COO from Canada but there is not much info on him. He owned a business for 4 years called J2 Entretien (but can’t find any info in it). He’s traded crypto for the last 1.5 years.

The rest of the team is similar to the above – very little experience in agriculture or blockchain.

There are also 10 Contributors/Advisors. They are average.

Verdict

When describing the benefits of Fieldcoin in Telegram, CEO Marc Couzic had this to say, among other things.

“Yes, it is a share profit system where 40% of net profits on production goes to the externalized land management company or farmer (choosen by Fieldcoin) exploiting the land and 60% to the owner. The holder of LANDS tokens won’t need to do a thing besides participating in decision concerning the type of crops and agricultural method used on its land. The idea is to levy the burden of execution for the investor and move towards agricultural automation processes. Additionally, the price of land grow on average 2-3% worldwide”

The idea of Fieldcoin is to have Decentralized Autonomous Communities that will decide on the agriculture products and management of their lands. They will vote on things like the amount of pesticides used, or if they want pure organic or reasonable agriculture.

The problem is DACs are complicated. Billion-dollar projects like Ethereum and EOS are still developing the tools to perfect them. Does Team Fieldcoin even have the ability to execute this massive project? It seems iffy, as they are fast approaching on the pre-sale and do not have an MVP. They only have this picture of one.

Risks

  • Small soft cap of just $3 million USD. According to the company: “the Proof of Concept can only be implemented once the FCO has reached $5 million USD. In the event of the cap not being reached, the Proof of Concept will be postponed.” This is sketchy. -1
  • The team is not very impressive at all. -2
  • Their business plan requires the minting of new Fieldcoin tokens to buy more land. They explain the process in detail here. -1
  • Only 13% of the funds raised will go to legal and marketing. -1
  • DACs are complicated. Many top projects are delaying launch until they figure out governance. -2

Growth Potential

  • First mover advantage. +2
  • They say they’ve already purchased land, have buying promises and about 35 offers to be displayed. +2
  • 85% of the Ecosystem asset reallocation is reserved for new land acquisitions further expanding the Ecosystem.+2
  • “Fieldcoin plans to target low-risk and average potential markets first, such as the countries within the European Union, and will then move slowly to countries with more venture capital and with much higher expected returns for Fieldcoin’s Ecosystem.”+1.5
  • 1% of the Fieldcoin tokens will be allocated to the Fieldcoin Foundation, which aims to develop community infrastructure. This project includes plans to build schools, water wells, irrigation systems, and roads.+2
  • “The Fieldcoin token is supported by “Trade-Back Protocol”, offering token holders the possibility to claim LANDS at a reduced price in case of market dips. Thanks to our upward trend capitalization mechanism, new physical lands will be acquired by Fieldcoin Ltd. increasing the guarantee of the Trade Back Protocol.”+2
  • Although we don’t score Fieldcoin well, these “respected” ICO sites have them ranked rather high. +0.5

Disposition

The tools required to build a proper DAC voting system are only now being built. Although something similar to this DAC agribusiness will someday soon be a reality, this project is too early and too ambitious, especially with such an inexperienced team. 5/10

Investment Details

  • Symbol: FLC (ERC20)  LANDS (ERC721)
  • Platform: Ethereum
  • Total Supply: 1 billion
  • Presale: Feb 4 – Feb 12, 2019 (100% bonus, 1 million USD worth of tokens available)
  • Price: 1 FLC = $0.05
  • FCO (Field Coin Offering) Start date: April 2nd 2019.
  • Hard Cap: $31 million
  • Soft Cap: $3 million
  • Telegramhttps://t.me/fieldcoin
  • Websitehttps://www.fieldcoin.io/
  • Barred Jurisdictions: USA and China

All unsold tokens will be burned.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.2 stars on average, based on 27 rated postsJoshua Larson is also known as the "Bullshit Man" for his ability to spot it a mile away. Avid ICO researcher and contributor. Former professional poker player/backer. Spent 10 years analyzing hand history, stats, and player data. Discovered blockchain in late 2016, and never looked back. He now uses his analysis skills to investigate ICOs full time. What a perfect match, because in today's crazy world of ICOs, information, passion, and diligence = dollar bills!




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending