Connect with us


ICO Analysis: Enjin Coin



We like when entrenched or existing players in industries see the power of the blockchain and identify their own opportunities within it. This is what we see with Enjin, who launched their online gaming-centric content management system in the same year that Bitcoin was getting off the ground. Enjin therefore gets the benefits of extolling its own virtues before pitching a new idea: millions in monthly revenue across over a quarter-million gaming communities around the globe.

While we have to avoid the fallacious idea that just because an idea worked in fiat sytems it will work even better on a blockchain, it is encouraging to know that the people approaching the project in question are deeply familiar with the subject matter. We lent Rex[] additional points on these grounds, being that their progenitors are established property development professionals and Rex is meant to serve that demographic. In the case of Enjin, they really took some time to find the right tool set for their task: they’re building a Bancor Protocol token, not just any ERC20 token.

The idea of Enjin’s ENJ token is not necessarily a new one. Brock Pierce originally made his real money from a firm that allowed people to sell virtual goods acquired through gaming. What Enjin would like to build is a system wherein players will be able to seamlessly do this, enabling content creators and players to have a much better experience when it comes to the dollars and dimes of gaming. Everyone agrees that game developers and studios should be paid, even subscriptions in the cases where ongoing content and services are in order. What is debatable is whether it should be a zero sum system when it comes to the digital goods and services offered inside of such a platform. It would seem that cryptocurrencies, native to the same way in the same way that massively multiplayer games themselves are, will fit right in to service the need of a solution.

Enjin will develop tools that enable game publishers, game servers, and communities to manage virtual goods and in-game items across multiple platforms. Monetization using Enjin Coin will be a key focus with robust features and toolsets provided. Great benefits will be gained by utilizing a decentralized platform and the supporting frameworks.

Building on Bancor

Enjin says on the token ICO page that they will be using Bancor to issue the tokens, but they don’t mention much in their whitepaper about their thinking here, or how this makes things better. In any case, Bancor is an established way of issuing tokens. It’s one of the purposes of the Bancor protocol, and one of its use-cases.

Nevertheless, having just enough technical grasp of what is going on with Bancor and Enjin, we can deduce that Enjin is using Bancor for its enhanced smart token capabilities. Bancor explains smart tokens, in part, in the following way:

Smart tokens are compatible with the ERC20 standard and can be used by any softwarethat supports this standard, such as Ethereum wallets. However, smart tokens offer additional functionality not available to regular tokens. Each smart token holds a reservebalance in one or more other ERC20 tokens, thereby enabling anyone to exchangebetween itself and any of its reserve token(s). The smart token’s smart contract issuesnew tokens (expanding the supply) to anyone who purchases it with any of its reservetokens, and withdraws tokens from the reserves (contracting supply) for anyone choosingto liquidate the smart token.

Presumably, ENJ, along with BNT and ETH, will act as base currencies for tokens issued within the Enjin platform.

But Who Needs It?

Enjin are good at identifying their market above all others. This harkens back to our earlier assertion that the best blockchain technologies will derive from those who are already familiar with the industries they intend to disrupt. In Enjin’s case, they’ve been able to install themselves as a medium between game publishers and their communities. In many ways, their company, at over 8 years old, has already outlived many of the games people probably first encountered them through.

Their goal is to produce a platform on which developers, community members, and players will be able to freely transact in digital goods and services related to interests they are already engaged in. Their first target market, although obviously they can expand to new games easier through native integrations, is an existing, global community of players already willing to spend money in a similar fashion.

They are entirely serious about this last aspect, with several developer tools built into their roadmap, one of which being a plugin for Unity, which is a popular engine on which modern video games are built.

The Unity C# SDK will allow creation of transaction requests, reading account balances, creation of subscriptions, and querying toplists.

There are a few other developer tools they speak of implementing right away. Making it easy for developers is a primarily important thing in the early phases. However, Enjin will already see some adoption regardless of this because it will be leveraging existing communities and relationships built over many years.

So far, so good. Where the rubber meets the road is in both the economic purposes and design and design of the ENJ token. We must now get to the heart of that.

Enjin Token (ENJ)

The Enjin platform itself can be seen as a sub-Ethereum, although it is technically sub-Bancor, protocol. Within it, an unlimited number of other tokens can be generated by the individual participant games and communities. These tokens can be used in a variety of ways. One important thing that we must determine before deciding on ENJ is whether or not they ever intend to go full ENJ. Meaning, will they always accept alternative payment methods for developers getting into the network? If so, there would also be a dilution of funds by virtue of arbitrage as well as attrition.

The answer to this question is made in part in the following statement:

Enjin Coin features will be integrated across the entire Enjin CMS platform and natively supported by over 250,000 existing gaming websites.

They go on to stress that it will be much cheaper for developers to accept payments through Enjin Coin and while this may be rue, it is not the confidence builder we’re looking for. We need systems that force the issue, or else the tokens are only a maybe sort of proposition. The systems that will yield more valuable tokens for token investors are those which build demand by having utility. Enjin’s token platform, and the many tokens that can be issued upon it, have such utility, but they are not going to allow themselves room to grow their network effect. A simple fix to this is forcing other payment rails off the site, and only competing with new platforms that want to integrate Enjin Coin in addition. This would create a more valuable token for competitive purposes, anyway.

Nevertheless, they do list out a number of interesting and valid use cases for the Enjin Coin:

  • Promotion on Enjin platform, perhaps within games there.
  • Payment gateway with almost no cost for usage.
  • Donation and reward setups for players and customers.
  • Automated payments.

We have confidence that the Enjin team are far more than capable of completing their technical goals. To this end, they have developed a UI concept which they share in their whitepaper:


In total, the sale will allow for the creation of 1 billion ENJ tokens. Since this is not a mineable currency, this appears to be all the tokens that will be created. The presale has been ongoing, and during this time a total $4,143,821.96 had already been raised at time of writing. Adding confusion to the issue, their bonus structure works opposite to the normal way, such that:

$2,000,000 USD and over receives a 50% bonus.

We won’t let this distract too much from the core values of the coin, which outweigh the one setback. Additionally, only 20% of the coins are being held back, whereas in many recent ICOs we have seen ratios as high as 50%, which can be problematic in determining an actual price on something.

The Verdict

The crucial part of a tokenized system is missing, but this doesn’t mean it can’t be repaired level. The author’s gripe with the system is simple enough: Enjin Coin will only be an additional payment option in the Enjin platform. But it will be a competitive one, and the decision to force the issue is at the discretion of a company which might benefit from that handsomely.


  • Without sufficient motivation, which is to say lack of choice in order to participate in the Enjin platform or any of its games, people will still often choose other payment rails even where Enjin would actually work out better for everyone involved. -3
  • Push-back from companies like Steam could add up to a mighty, unforeseen force of competition. -1

Growth Potential

  • We like building this on Bancor, which is steadily gaining momentum in terms of value, as people begin begin to realize its potential and things are built on its protocol. Like Ethereum or anything else, Bancor’s value relies on the tokens beneath it, which in turn will benefit from the stability provided therein. A similar effect is had on Enjin by its own design, and since it comes on board with a quarter-million compatible platforms, we see dollar signs. +3
  • The variety of developer toolkits will likely add up to actual integration, especially if some of the reserved tokens are used to incentivize user demand through bounty campaigns. Such campaigns could focus on getting developers to build on Enjin. We can foresee a company like Enjin being wise enough to do as much. +2.5
  • The cost of platforms continues to goes down, the adoption of games continues to rise. Enjin will be positioned to profit from the nexus of the rise of both gaming and the blockchain. +2
  • As exhaustively noted heretofore, this company knows what it is doing. That it already has a community to leverage money from, which already willingly pays it money through other means, means that it will be able to extract more value via the blockchain, and provide more value as well, since there will be fewer fees yet more possibilities. +2


We arrive at a solid 5.5 for this initial coin offering, with room to go either way depending on developments of the actual rollout. This won’t take long to see, since the company backing it will certainly deliver something.

Investment Details

The presale is ongoing. The total coins generated will be 1 billion. Please follow all instructions carefully when reviewing this ICO and do your own additional research before sending money anywhere.

Further investment details are available at

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.

5 stars on average, based on 2 rated postsP. H. Madore has covered the cryptocurrency beat over the course of hundreds of articles for Hacked's sister site, CryptoCoinsNews, as well as some of her competitors. He is a major contributing developer to the Woodcoin project, and has made technical contributions on a number of other cryptocurrency projects. In spare time, he recently began a more personalized, weekly newsletter at

Feedback or Requests?



  1. kyenneti

    September 2, 2017 at 2:09 am

    P. H. Madore, How do the ratings work? Does a 5.5 means a buy or not a buy? Is there a range for strong buy/Buy/Buy with caution/Not a Buy? Are you buying these tokens?

  2. claudio_101

    September 2, 2017 at 11:58 am

    Do you have any idea if the ENJIN coin is going to be traded on exchanges? Because I can imagine that not only gamers would want to invest in this ICO. Well what I’m asking is how are non gamers going to profit from this ICO?

  3. cryptonoob

    September 6, 2017 at 6:49 pm

    This one looks like a really great idea with a realistic but ambitious roadmap and a team that looks up to the challenge.

    So, what are we missing ? Why does the presale does not sell completely out yet ?

    Is it because there is no first mover advantage (first blood) or no real marketing effort yet ?

  4. jagrmeister

    September 12, 2017 at 9:18 am

    One thing I’m not clear on: is the team putting this together part of Enjin. Are they on Enjin’s payroll and this is an internal operation of the company? They have titles like Founder/CEO but do they also hold a separate title with Enjin (such as Director, Sr. Software Developer), etc. I’m trying to understand how autonomous this team is; and also how tight their relationship with Enjin is. One concern I have is alignment. Small startup teams work their tail off because everything depends on it. Enjin Coin could disappear and no one use it; and the company would be doing just fine w/its current source of revenue. The people involved, if they work for Enjin, could drift off to other parts of that company. Ultimately startups bust their tail off in ways that drive the coin price up; but employees at Enjin (if that’s what this team is) won’t necessarily have the same mentality. (If this is an internal project, and they’re on salary with Enjin, the coin allocation to the team for this project doesn’t seem sensible. Not a deal-breaker but not the same thing as working without comp. for a year or two to build a crypto asset).

  5. jagrmeister

    September 12, 2017 at 9:23 am

    I got a response from Enjin here to my comment/question above. “The Enjin Coin project is getting full time allocation from the founding team. We already have staff in place to handle the Enjin Business. Enjin is a mature service with minimal maintenance required. Of course we’ll continue to release new features, such as Enjin Coin Integrations and other updates to the network. The Enjin business will be hiring more staff to accommodate any possible shortcomings since the founding team are now fully dedicated on the Enjin Coin project roadmap.”

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


ICO Analysis: IoTBlock



Internet of Things is an emerging technology with the potential of immensely improving our lives. Connecting every single capable device, whether it is a car, a home appliance or a billboard, IoT allows for the collection and enabling of data analysis in a more efficient, faster and cheaper way. Consider that a car accident has just happened quite close to your workplace. This causes a traffic jam, making it inconvenient to use a private car. Usually, this information is either made public too late or is not released at all. If you had known, you could have used some other means of transportation, like the metro, and avoided wasting your time in traffic.

It is almost certain that this technology will take off in the future as many industry giants have already started to research and produce several products. In fact, it is estimated that by 2025 the IoT sector will grow to $11 trillion with 75 billion devices. Yet as in any emerging technology, just as in the case of blockchains, there are several problems which are required to be solved before it is widely used by the public. Studies show that 70% of IoT devices use non-encrypted forms of communications and 80% don’t have even the most basic security. Unfortunately, this makes it possible for hackers to abuse security flaws in a single device and gain access to the whole network. For instance, earlier this year, some hackers used an IoT-connected fish tank thermometer to steal a casino’s database.

In order to solve current and foreseeable problems in the IoT industry, IoTBlock provides a device-agnostic and blockchain-agnostic protocol. This agnosticism should be highlighted, since it means that the protocol can be used by any IoT device and any blockchain, whether it is Ethereum, IOTA, or Hedera Hashgraph. As of now, even the most popular blockchain-based IoT solution provider IOTA does not offer this. IoTBlock’s other important key features include secure authentication, open auditability, and cross-chain communication. The protocol can be used for IoT device authentication, insurance and dispute resolution, device health and safety verification, and data exchange.

Thanks to the use of Ora Protocol, a truly decentralized network of IoT devices is made possible. By its proof of authority, nodes are incentivized to serve truthful data and report inaccurate or malicious data. These nodes are rewarded with tokens in return for their contributions to the network.


Although very little information regarding the token’s use is released at the time of writing, for now, we can say that it will act as a native token to pay fees for platform services. It should be noted that it is emphasized that the token is looking for a stable price per token, which is quite reasonable if it is to be widely used.

No information on the IoTBlock token metrics or how the team is planning to use the token sale proceeds are released at the time of writing.


CTO Michael Arbach: Arbach was a blockchain architect at KodakOne.

Sanjeev Verma: Prior to joining to AMD as a principal architect, Verma has worked as a mobile security architect at Samsung Electronics, a senior research engineer at Nokia and a member of technical staff at Bell Labs.

Richard Fushimi: Fushimi was the CEO at Rocket Internet SE, the president, and COO at Sega, and a managing consultant at Genpact Headstrong Capital Markets.

Leo Rong: Rong has worked as a software engineer at Splunk for over thirty months.


Chad Pleper: Pleper was a senior infrastructure architect at Elsevier.

Tugrul Firatli: Firatli has worked as the vice-president of global communication practice at TIBCO Software, as a software engineer at Apple and as a member of technical staff at Bell Labs.

Rex Wong: Wong was a founding investor at Applied Semantics, the company who created AdSense and later sold it to Google in 2003.


Below is a breakdown of the risks and growth potential of IoTBlock.


  • No information regarding token metrics is not released at the time of writing. This makes it hard to evaluate the project’s worth and any potential return on investment. (-1)
  • It is a reasonable assumption that the competition in the IoT sector will be harsh in the future. As more and more technology giants might enter the market, it is likely that they might leave the blockchain-based IoT companies like IoTBlock in the dust with their superior resources. (-2)

Growth Potential

  • All-star team members like Sanjeev Verma and Richard Fushimi. (+2)
  • The protocol’s device- and block-chain agnosticism. (+3.5)
  • The team’s origins can be traced to a hardware and RFID device manufacturer started in 2004. This shows that the team is highly experienced in the IoT sector and not just riding the blockchain hype train. (+2.5)


The emerging technology of the Internet of Things is expected to be widely used in the near future. It is estimated that by 2025 the sector will grow to a value of $11 trillion with 75 billion devices. Its use cases are limited only by one’s imagination, but as in the case of any emerging technology, just like blockchains, there are several important problems to be solved to gain wide public acceptance.

Currently, 70% of IoT devices do not use encrypted forms of communication and 80% do not have a basic level of security. As devices in a certain place are connected to the same network, to gain unlimited access to one device is to gain access to the whole network. Some hackers’ gaining access to a thermometer in a fish tank and using it to steal a casino’s database earlier in this year is an example.

IoTBlock provides novel solutions to solve this issues. The team consists of all-star team members like Sanjeev Verma and Richard Fushimi. The protocol is designed in a device- and blockchain-agnostic way, so that IoTBlock can be used by any IoT-connected device and blockchain.

Still, no information on token metrics is released as of the time of writing, making it hard to evaluate any return on investment. Also, the competition in the IoT sector will be extremely fierce in the future and the entrance of more and more technology giants to the sector might leave the blockchain-based IoT companies like IoTBlock in the dust with their superior resources. IoTBlock receives a 6/10.

Investment Details

  • Type: ERC20 – Utility
  • Symbol: Unspecified
  • Platform: Ethereum
  • Crowdsale: Unspecified
  • Minimum Investment: Unspecified
  • Price: Unspecified
  • Hard Cap: Unspecified
  • Payments Accepted: Unspecified
  • Restricted from Participating: Unspecified

For More Information

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.

4.8 stars on average, based on 34 rated posts

Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading


ICO Analysis: EndChain



Logistics is a series of transactions that link a product from raw material through to the consumer. The logistics and transport management industry generate approximately 13% of GDP globally. Current supply chain logistics models are good, but not great. They can be improved by blockchain technology.

EndChain is a new project based on Ethereum, which aims to disrupt the logistics industry through decentralization, open protocols, and utilities. They believe the best way to improve current systems is to eliminate almost everything except the scan of the package.  According to them, “Technology can be molded to handle the rest of the necessary steps and to fit the needs of all users wanting to access the data.”

From the whitepaper:

“While some companies have attempted to create blockchain solutions for modern logistical problems, no complete solution exists today. Current options revolve around expensive RFID chips or an overt reliance on consumer input. EndChain focuses on the entire logistics chain: from manufacturer to businesses to customer to reseller. The goal of EndChain is to become the blockchain solution that the logistics industry desperately needs by allowing one blockchain that is easy to use for all verticals of the supply chain.”

EndChain wants to reduce the cost of logistics by providing a blockchain that’s responsible for all the data across the supply chain. Their uniform blockchain lets businesses easily adapt and communicate with one another. Their system will cover each sector of the supply chain, including the second-hand market.

The entire Endchain system is based on the use of their patent-pending QR/barcode design. Each item produced in the EndChain supply chain is paired with a unique id that can be automatically registered on the chain. This id is the foundation of Endchain and ensures that every physical item is linked to its digital counterpart.

All businesses which use the EndChain software will be able to identify themselves as producers, transportation, B2B or B2C stores. Employees simply need to scan the code. That simple scan will break down both the generic barcode and the individualized QR code. The software then automatically updates the chain with the new data that can be seen by all users.

There are 2 major benefits to their QR/barcode combo:

  1. It simplifies the scanning process. Instead of 2 or 3 separate barcodes, logistics workers will only have one easy to read code, filled with all the data.
  2. The code will update both the blockchain and the legacy systems at the same time. This allows EndChain to easily integrate with legacy systems that may not want to completely change their current methods just yet.

Additional benefits:

  • Reinforce the Authenticity of product
  • Secure transactions and fast settlements
  • Visibility in the supply chain
  • Cost-effective
  • Route optimization
  • More info on the product and cheaper costs
  • Ownership history


ENCN token is required to purchase QR codes, make smart contracts, and access the data stream.

Token burning: EndChain’s self-regulating economy burns 2-4% of tokens per transaction. It works by destroying  more coins if the current market value of the ENCN is low. If the value of ENCN rises, less supply is destroyed as fewer coins are required for each smart contract.


  • 55% ICO
  • 22% Future development
  • 10% Team
  • 5% Leadership
  • 5% Advisors
  • 3% Bounty and referrals.

Use of proceeds:

  • 60% Development
  • 25% Marketing/sales
  • 5% Legal
  • 5% Security and compliance
  • 5% G & E


Team EndChain is a mixed group from all around the globe. 15 team members and 9 advisors are listed.

Aaron Perkowitz – CEO.  Since October 2017 until now he’s been a Fund Manager at HNA Group, a global Fortune 500 company focused on aviation, tourism, logistics and financial services. Other than that, he lists 3 internships; Morgan Stanley, AngelVest, and RocketSpace.

Pierre Angot – CTO. Paris, France.  A self proclaimed Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain maestro, co-founded Medway, a telephone medicine app with between 2-10 employees. 2 years Managing Director at WAGT Consulting. Currently a Data Consultant at Verteego.

Felix Engelhardt – Business Developer. Currently (8 years) an Analyst at Cimic Group Limited, a world-leading infrastructure, mining, services and  private partnerships group with over 1,000 employees.

Javince Chan – UI/UX Designer. Lots of experience specifically in UX design; Currently at Quadrant Studio, she’s also worked for Amazon (1 yr), AKQA (1 yr), and Symplicit.

It’s an impressive group of advisors, with specific skills they acquired from places like; Huawei, Cimic Group, Morgan Stanley, Audi, Uber, Activision and Blizzard.

Partners are highlighted below:


“EndChain provides a complete and cost-effective logistics package that benefits all parties of the supply chain. While most utility tokens focus on high end goods, EndChain focuses on the low to middle market, an area that has been ignored for too long. EndChain is able to enter this market due to the ease and low price of our system compared to other utility tokens which focus on expensive NFC chips or manual entry.”

The current blockchain solutions for the logistics industry won’t work for the majority of goods. They are too expensive to mass produce, therefore, they focus on luxury goods such as handbags, diamonds, and art while the vast majority of market purchases are ignored. EndChain is working on a solution by making a cost-effective product that can be applied to all goods.


  • Ethereum Blockchain. -1
  • There is already a lot of blockchain competition, and all their token values are at all time lows right now. Demand is not currently here. -2
  • 3% of their tokens will go to bounty/referrels. These bounty hoes usually just dump their tokens as soon as they hit an exchange. -1
  • 50% presale bonus. Same thing as above. They will dump at the first sign of dumpage. -1
  • This will be really challenging to scale. -1.5
  • Unsold tokens may or may not be burned. When we asked them in Telegram, their response was, “Once we got a concrete details, Soon we will be having an important announcement regarding that matter, stay tuned.” -0.5

Growth Potential

  • The team has produced a very profession ICO, a patent pending scan system, and lots of work on GitHub. Here’s their CEO giving a quick explanation on the work they have achieved so far. +2
  • Their uniqe QR code incorporates a barcode within the QR code. This allows users to scan the only code found on the packaging. Businesses that still use a legacy system can scan the embedded barcode. +3
  • 2-4% of the revenue generated from sales will be dedicated to burning EndChain tokens. +4
  • They will give a percentage of ENCN tokens to tradition shipping companies for free, to recruit them to the blockchain. Once they see the benefit of EndChain, they will become valuable costumers. +2
  • One of the largest benefits of this system is that it can be done offline. Information isn’t being downloaded, only uploaded, therefore it can remain in the system until its fully loaded, no need to wait to scan the next item. +3


The team is strong, the whitepaper is professional, and the roadmap is realistically detailed. The goal is to launch the full version in Q3 2020. If they raise enough money in this token sale, we like their chances more than most. 7/10

Investment Details

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.

4.2 stars on average, based on 26 rated postsJoshua Larson is also known as the "Bullshit Man" for his ability to spot it a mile away. Avid ICO researcher and contributor. Former professional poker player/backer. Spent 10 years analyzing hand history, stats, and player data. Discovered blockchain in late 2016, and never looked back. He now uses his analysis skills to investigate ICOs full time. What a perfect match, because in today's crazy world of ICOs, information, passion, and diligence = dollar bills!

Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading


ICO Analysis: OATH Protocol




OATH Protocol wants to build an analog of a decentralized dispute resolution system modeling the common-juror system. In their view, this will solve the solution to the blockchain governance problem.

OATH Protocol wants to provide a solution to the Blockchain Governance system.

In order to do this the company plans to:

  • increase the usability of smart contracts by providing an easy to use user-friendly smart contract creation tool
  • creating a decentralized jury community, comprised of members with diverse backgrounds and areas of expertise
  • invites users from all communities to not only provide governance for the dApp they support but also for other ecosystems.

The protocol’s main advantages include:

  • Trust – all data is hashed on a blockchain.
  • Confidentiality – all jury members data of confidential.
  • Dynamicity – protocol will ensure that different jurors will be resolving multiple cases to avoid a collision and ensure the integrity.
  • Fairness – protocol will ensure random jurors selection based on a variety of factors as gender, background, age, etc. to have full objectivity.
  • Incentive – a mechanism to motivate jurors for participating and assign them credit.
  • Autonomy – parties mutually set rules that they would be bound by.
  • Transparency – jury votes are disclosed to the community after resolution.
  • Archive – protocol allows keeping all data in a structured irrecoverable way.

Use cases include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • E-commerce, which involves a variety of disputes, such as quality problems, missing pieces, broken product, etc. OATH jury will resolve each dispute based on user-provided testimony.
  • OTC trade of digital assets.
  • Disputes involving decentralized property rent.
  • Decentralized moderation.
  • Oracle for betting.
  • public chain governance.

So basically OATH is a decentralized agnostic protocol that offers a solution to of decentralized governance to all blockchains and Dapps.

Blockchain architecture is highlighted below:

OATH Protocol is an agnostic blockchain which may be integrated into other Daps and public chains.

The chain contains two main files:

  • Case ledger, which includes all information such as contracts, verdicts, voting reasons, selected jurors.
  • IPFS (InterPlanetary File System), which is a network designed to create a content-addressable, peer-to-peer method of storing and sharing hypermedia in a distributed file system. It replaces traditional domain names with content addresses so that users don’t have to consider names and paths of file storage.


The total token supply is: 10,000,000,000 ERC-20 tokens (OATH).

Token use is summarized below:

  • Engagement between participants/granting access to the platform
  • Internal currency

Tokens are earned as nodes, disputes resolution and community services.


We see a well-balanced team with a diverse background in tech, business, and law. Yin Xu, CEO, won several awards for best mobile application.

Jenny Vatrenko, COO, is an influential lawyer and  former litigator at Boles Shiller. She is active on the group’s Telegram channel.

Hongwei Wang has a strong technical background, including eight years of combined experience at Google and other tech-focused companies in China.

On the advisor side, we see people from Zefund, Qidain Capital, Continue Capital, a founder of an EOS supernode and energy startup NAD. Advisors cover the main focus groups: technology, business and legal. Jia Tian is a notable advisor who worked at Baidu and Alibaba, and is a big investor in Bitfinex Dafeng Guo. Tian worked for big investment banks like Morgan Stanley and Goldman.

Zainan Zuo is another notable advisor who serves as a core developer at Ethereum, and is a main developer of the ERC-1202 standard for Ethereum.


Several notable investors from the VC and blockchain worlds are also worth mentioning. While most are medium-sized funds, Quarkchain is among them. Quarkchain was a top ROI project during the second quarter of this year. EOS Asia and NEM are also partnering with OATH.


In general, the project looks interesting. The team has the necessary technical skills to implement the product. We see the support of smart money. The very idea of the product itself is exciting. The decentralized dispute resolution system, which can be used both as a means of resolving disputes between traditional subjects in arbitration and within a decentralized system, deserves interest.


  • The project does not have MVP, only active Github. -1
  • Low public activity. -0.75

Growth Potential

  • The strong point is that it is an agnostic protocol so that it can be plugged to any blockchain and provide additional value to that respected network with their service. +2
  • The overall idea is interesting. +1
  • Any user of any blockchain can automatically be selected as a juror for OATH dispute which provides flexibility and helps to get users on board. +1
  • The token use case is rather strong – parties must deposit tokens during dispute case and pay arbitrators for their services. +1
  • The roadmap is medium long. Although for this kind of project long-term potential will rise together with overall crypto field and decentralization. +1
  • Token metrics are on the good side. +1
  • Team, advisors, partners, and VCs have been verified. +1.5


I would say that the project is above average, but one should wait for prototype and full metrics to make the full investment decision. Currently, the rating of 6.75/10 is warranted, though it may be further increased or decreased once the project is up and running.

Investment Details

  • Type: utility
  • Symbol: OATH
  • Platform: erc-20
  • Crowdsale: TBA
  • Minimum Investment: TBA
  • Price: TBA
  • Hard Cap: TBA
  • Payments Accepted: TBA
  • Restrictions Barred from Participating: TBA

General details:

Website –

Whitepaper –

FB –

Telegram –

Medium –

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.

4.9 stars on average, based on 29 rated postsVladislav Semjonov has a legal and financial background. He has been involved in crypto space since early 2017 in both ICO advising positions in several ICO consultancy firms, and as an ICO analyst for VC. He began contributing for in April 2017.

Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

A part of CCN is Neutral and Unbiased and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)