Ever wondered how Blockchain adoption will truly achieve scale? Many different solutions have been suggested like linking of the existing blockchains (Ark, Aion); making improvements in blockchains like Ethereum so they can support scale; or creating radically new blockchain technologies like EOS.
The majority of these solutions focus on enabling future decentralized applications or dApps to leverage blockchain technology. COMSA is based on the belief that blockchain adoption will truly scale when existing businesses start making use of the blockchain technology. COMSA aims to make the transition process towards blockchain a seamless experience for these existing businesses.
“COMSA” is derived from “Computer” and 鎖 (Kusari/Sa): meaning “chain,” combining to make “blockchain.”
COMSA wants to become a one-stop shop for companies wishing to integrate themselves on the blockchain, issue tokens and become exchange listed.
The core offering of COMSA includes bringing and enabling the existing enterprises onto blockchain and then bridging their private blockchains to the public blockchains of Ethereum, Bitcoin and NEM.
COMSA will bring existing enterprises on blockchain by providing consultation, blockchain expertise and solutions which will enable enterprises to have their very own ICOs, implement blockchain technology into their business practices, and list tokens on the exchange all at the same time, as a one stop solution.
Enterprises will use the Mijin private blockchain to implement their business models. Mijin is a private blockchain solution offered by Tech Bureau, the parent company of COMSA. Based on the NEM protocol, Mijin allows any entity to build high transaction throughputs in a private blockchain using a peer to peer network.
These private blockchains of enterprises running on Mijin will be bridged with NEM, Ethereum and the Bitcoin public networks using COMSA. By bridging the enterprises to these public blockchains, the enterprises can have an immediate and extended market to sell their products and services and continue to develop their blockchain solutions to cater for mainstream users.
The use of private blockchain based on Mijin makes it easy for enterprises to carry on their day-to-day activities on blockchain due to the high throughput capacity that Mijin supports, while the bridge with existing well known blockchains like Ethereum will enable the token holders of these blockchains to transact with the enterprises easily.
COMSA also pegs tokens among NEM, Ethereum and Mijin private blockchains. COMSA will also issue pegged tokens for major fiat currencies, and allow people to trade or contract in fiat currency virtually on the NEM and Ethereum blockchains.
By pegging tokens among NEM, Ethereum, and Mijin private blockchains, the COMSA solution becomes a practical “catalyst” between centralized businesses and decentralized blockchains. In addition, the offering helps contribute to the growth of the entire blockchain ecosystems in Bitcoin, NEM, and Ethereum.
Token and Crowdraise
The revenues coming into the platform from consulting fees, Mijin licence and token conversion fees will be used for burning the CMS tokens. This will increase value for the token holders. One key point to note is that COMSA has not given clarity on the portion of the revenues that will be used to burn the CMS tokens. The token holders will also get 5% discount on the upcoming ICOs on the COMSA platform and a voting right when a decision is to be made whether the platform should go ahead with an ICO or not.
The ICO began on 2nd October and will end on November 6th. There is no hardcap limit for the raise. Around $81 million USD has been raised in the ICO so far! There is an ongoing 5% bonus offer for the participants who contribute from 11th to 25th October.
1 CMS token is valued at 1 USD.
The team behind Tech Bureau has created COMSA to enable mainstream blockchain adoption. Tech Bureau is a venture capital backed Crypto-Fintech Lab founded in 2014 by COMSA CEO Takao Asayama. Tech Bureau had acquired Japan’s oldest and operating Bitcoin exchange “Etwings” in early 2015, and relaunched it as “Zaif” in April 2015. Zaif has been a token oriented crypto exchange since Aug 2016.
Tech Bureau is also behind the commercial private blockchain solution Mijin, which is going to be a key component of COMSA. Tech Bureau has gone through extensive vetting as it has received close to $25 million of funding through venture capital channels. We rate the COMSA team highly on credibility considering the work that they have done on Tech Bureau. CEO Takao Asayama is also a Council Member of NEM and is on the boards of many Japanese organizations. There are 6 executive members listed on the company website including the CEO and 20 ICO committee members.
There is a strong support and backing for the project from Japanese investment circles. There are already a few companies working with the team and planning their ICOs. The idea is very exciting and will solve the issues of scalability and interoperability, which are the major roadblocks for enterprises when they think about blockchain adoption.
With everything working in its favour, the major concern comes in from the core of the business which is Initial Coin Offering. There are significant regulatory concerns around ICOs, something which might discourage established businesses to participate. Having already raised $80 million USD since October 2nd, we can see that there is a significant investor interest in the project.
- Any radical decision by the Japanese government about ICOs will disrupt the business model. Although the possibility of Japan going the China way is low, this is still a risk which needs to be factored in. -2
- The economic value addition of the CMS token to the token holders is another point of concern. The COMSA team has not given a clarity on the portion of revenues that will be used to burn the tokens. The returns coming in from the token burn might be insignificant, seeing the high market cap that COMSA is expected to get. There is no other value driver for the tokens as contributions to the ICOs on the platform can also be done using Ether or NEM. -3
- The project has a strong support from the business community in Japan and many established businesses have expressed their interest in working with COMSA. There is also a significant credibility attached to Tech Bureau. +4
- Core modules of the project like the mijin private blockchain and the Zaif exchange are already functional. +3
- Most importantly, the project usecase is very exciting and the market potential for a company which enables blockchain adoption for enterprises is very high. +4
We arrive at a score of +6 for COMSA. Although there are some negatives in the form of regulatory concerns around ICOs and the CMS tokens not carrying much economic value; we still see COMSA in a positive light due to the strong product offering and the high credibility attached to it.
You can participate in the ICO here.
ICO Analysis: Gimmer Token
The impeccable rise of algorithmic trading has ushered in a new wave of do-it-yourself (DIY) algorithmic trading bots. With the success of these DIY bots in traditional financial markets, it was only a matter of time until they entered the cryptocurrency market.
For algorithmic trading, volatility creates opportunity sets. And with cryptocurrencies still trading in an inefficient market, volatility runs rampant. This level of volatility creates an ideal environment for even the most rudimentary algorithmic trading strategies. However, there is a lack of DIY automated trading bots that are available for use by amatuer cryptocurrency traders. With this in mind, Gimmer is looking to take advantage of this need.
According to the company’s website, “Gimmer offers easy-to-use advanced algorithmic trading bots that require no programming skills, no previous trading experience and no in-depth knowledge of cryptocurrencies.”
Essentially, Gimmer is hoping to position itself as the leading DIY algorithmic trading bots for individual cryptocurrency traders. While the company may never be the “Quantopian” of the cryptocurrency space, Gimmer does provide a novel solution for amateur traders.
The Gimmer token (GMR) will be implemented using the Ethereum ERC20. While GMR tokens will be visible in participants’ ERC20 wallet, the tokens will not be tradable until the close of the public sale on January 31, 2018. GMR tokens will issued starting from January 3, 2018. GMR holders generate value from the token as a form of payment for the rental cost of Gimmer’s trading bots. For users, the rental cost scales proportionately to the level of sophistication desired – more sophistication equals higher return (at least in theory).
According to the whitepaper, 45% of the funds raised will go towards development and operations, 35% towards marketing and acquisition, 15% towards the founders and team, with the remainder of the pot (5%) going to legal and compliance.
Gimmer Tokens are valued at 1 Ether (ETH) per 1,000 GMR (plus applicable bonuses). The total amount of tokens to be sold is capped at 100,000,000 GMR. However, an additional 6,000,000 GMR will be created for advisors, reserves, and the team, with another 4,000,000 GMR created for bounties.
The company has not yet stated its intention to list the GMR tokens on any major crypto exchanges.
Gimmer’s core team consists of two senior developers, a global macro hedge fund manager, and a creative design veteran. As compared with the majority of ICOs, Gimmer’s team is in-line with the relative standard – the quality of team meets basic expectations.
The company’s CEO, Philipe Comini, is a senior-level UX/UI designer who is also balancing two other jobs (according to LinkedIn) – typically, not a good sign. The company’s CTO, Persio Flexa, is also a senior developer who recently launched 2 other start-ups – again, not a good sign. The company’s COO, Paul Lindsell, is a creative design veteran with over 12 years experience that is seemingly committed to his role – not balancing multiple jobs. The company’s CIO, Masaichi Hasegawa, is currently a global macro hedge fund manager and an executive of a shoe manufacturing company – the third C-suite executive of Gimmer to balance two other jobs.
The rest of Gimmer’s team consists of a marketing director, a user experience director, two developers, a customer researcher, a commercial director, and a journalist.
Gimmer presents a highly speculative buying opportunity for investors interested in short-term capital appreciation.
Creating profitable algorithmic trading strategies is incredibly difficult. Hedge funds typically employ a large staff of mathematicians, experienced machine learning engineers, data scientists, and the like – Wall Street refers to them as “quants.” Quants typically hold a PhD in finance or quantitative mathematics and have years of hands-on experience with both statistical analysis and engineering (Python and C++). Does Gimmer employ any quants? No, not even by the slightest measure.
Overall, Gimmer’s DIY algorithmic trading bots are likely just a novel tool-kit for amatuer cryptocurrency traders, nothing more, nothing less.
Gimmer provides no data on slippage modeling, meaning users have no idea of all the transaction costs that are associated with a higher frequency of trading (including: fees, commission, and slippage). These costs can be significant and add up quickly. -1
Gimmer’s core team does not seem to be dedicated (balancing multiple jobs) or qualified in any sense. With Gimmer’s team lacking any real trading platform experience, unforeseen issues with their algorithms may lead to sizable losses for users. -1.5
Gimmer provides no data on latency, meaning users do not know if the company’s algorithms are deployed to proximity-based execution servers in attempt to achieve low-latency performance no matter where the user is located. For all trading strategies, latency must be measured and managed in order to maximize the probability of success. -1
Provided that Gimmer’s trading bots run successfully without any technical glitches, users could benefit from enhanced risk management protocols, thereby insuring their principal investment through more downside protection. +2
Copy trading techniques could benefit novice traders, as they can publicly see high level information such as start date, running period, currency pairs and percent gained. Based on the public information, users can copy seemingly successful trading strategies and rent the same bots. +3
Automated trading strategies will allow a larger pool of traders to invest in cryptocurrencies. Since the market is still subject to large, volatile price swings, more passive traders could use Gimmer’s platform to execute automated trades (based on pre-set parameters) without having to monitor the market on a day-to-day basis. +2.5
While algorithmic trading in the cryptocurrency space is a smart strategy, Gimmer lacks the sophistication of even the most basic trading platforms. The biggest concern beyond Gimmer’s lack of sophistication, is the pedigree of the core team. With no quants on staff and a couple UI/UX designers creating the algorithms, technical issues are likely to occur. And with that in mind, faulty algorithms or platform glitches could easily lead to the loss of principal investment for users.
For amateur traders interested in novel tool to play around with, Gimmer is a great choice. For veteran traders with solid programming and statistical skills, move on to a better platform.
Against this backdrop, we believe that a score of 4.0 out of 10 is warranted.
- Type: Crowdsale
- Symbol: GMR
- Pre-ICO Sale: November 24, 2017
- Public Sale: January 3, 2018
- Payments Accepted: ETH
Disclaimer: no position in Gimmer at the time of writing.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.
ICO Analysis: Lendoit
Lendoit is a next-generation peer to peer decentralized lending platform based on Ethereum, which connects lenders and borrowers all over the world using the advantages of smart contracts.
The Lendoit platform provides professional scoring and verification, APIS for each country, a loan marketplace where lenders set rates on loan applications, a default market where failed loans can be traded, syndicated loans, and the ability to sell a loan to another lender if needed. Lendoit will be the only lending platform on the market that does not take collaterals. The company believes that, “in a world of crypto micro-loans, managing collaterals is not sensible.” In their view, this is “like lending USD by using EUR as collateral.”
Because there are no collaterals, the Lendoit platform combines four methods to mitigate the chances of lenders losing money: Smart Compensation Fund, Syndicated Loans, 3rd party scoring/verification from local companies, and a collectors market where debts can be sold.
The following is a simplified guide to Lendoit’s loan process.
- The borrower applies for a loan by filling out an application. This takes about three minutes.
- The borrower uploads any relevant verification (i.e. government-issued photo ID) according to their particular country’s regulations.
- Lendoit sends the loan app and verified information to verified scoring providers to receive a score for the current loan.
- Lendoit will publish each smart loan contract in the blockchain and marketplace.
- Lenders Tender is a process of raising loans for funds requested by the borrower.
- The borrower can now withdraw the funds using his or her wallet.
- When the date to pay back the loan arrives, the borrower receives a notification.
- The borrower now repays the funds with interest to the smart contract.
- The lender withdraws his money in the same currency he loaned it.
- The lender receives interest in the form of LOAN tokens, the amount based on an automatic conversion algorithm put in place by the Smart Conversion Contract.
- The Smart Compensation Fund Contract helps lenders recover a small portion of their money, if the borrower fails to pay. The amount is not confirmed, but it seems like it will be around 20-30%.
- If the borrower fails to pay the interest and the loan becomes defaulted, the smart loan contract is offered to a collectors tender. The collector who wins the tender buys the debt, which minimizes the loss of funds for the lenders.
Lendoit has an alpha version of its platform available here. It is not very impressive yet. The real technology (smart contracts) has yet to be created.
They plan to release the beta in Q1 of 2018, and the fully operational version Q3 of 2018.
- Symbol: LOAN
- Platform: Ethereum
- Presale: Dec. 13 – December 27, 2017 (125 million for sale. 1 ETH = 13,000 LOAN). Must register for whitelist in order to contribute.
- Token sale: Jan. 18 – Feb. 18, 2018 (475 million for sale. sale starts at 1 ETH = 12,000 LOAN)
- Total Supply: 1 billion
- Hard Cap: 50,000 Eth (currently $22 million USD)
The LOAN token plays several roles. Here are a few of the most important:
- Lenders can use any ERC20 currency to loan, but must hold 10% of whatever amount they loan in LOAN tokens. For example, a lender wants to loan someone $1,000 ETH must hold $100 worth of LOAN in his account.
- Borrower must use LOAN to publish the Smart Loan Contract.
- All the fees charged on the platform are paid in LOANs.
- All the interest payments will be paid to the lenders in LOANs. This will take place automatically via the Smart Conversion Contract.
The company is located in Israel but incorporated in Gibraltar. The company maintains a large global team that extends far beyond its in-house operation. However, after researching the four co-founders of the company, nothing particularly striking stands out. One would have expected a more impressive track record for those launching a platform of this magnitude.
Seven advisers are signed on to the project, including Richard Titus and Michael Terpin. They also have eight developers, which is fantastic, as it shows they really are trying.
The team picture (above) leaves a lot to be desired, as it is not very professional.
This project has great long-term potential. Its biggest challenge is going to be whether or not it can successfully build the various forms of smart contracts it proposes to launch. There are no known smart contracts in existence that can do what Lendoit promises its contracts will be able to do.
- The concept of not needing collateral to receive loans could be a disaster. Why would lenders want to use this platform when the possibility of getting stiffed is so high? They can just use one of Lendoit’s competitors to guarantee their returns. -2
- The project faces legal hurdles galore. Sure, the plan is to be decentralized, which could reduce certain regulations, but the company is going to be verifying borrowers’ identities in great detail. I could see governments clamping down on projects such as this one if enough lenders start getting ripped off. -2
- The technology required to run this platform does not exist yet. The demo/alpha provided as an example of is extremely basic. It’s a strong possibility the team fails, and this never gets off the ground. -2
- The company has several partners, including Bloom, Hive, RSK, and Wings. I tried to dig deeper into these partnerships but didn’t find anything substantial. These seem to be decent projects, and LOAN can use each to grow.+2
- Some of these other new lending ICOs have done pretty well so far on the markets. SALT token, for example, is extremely hyped. One of the main differences between SALT and LOAN is that SALT requires borrowers to put up collateral, while LOAN does not. One would think this would bring more borrowers to the platform +2
- If they do what they claim to be able to do – build these genius smart contracts – they can change the lending game permanently. In this way, the sky is the limit. +4
- The team has put a great deal of emphasis on development, as evidenced by the number of developers they have on board. +2
As previously stated, the most important aspect of this project is the technology. Can they build these contracts? According to the roadmap, we won’t see the beta version for two or three months, and we won’t be able to judge if the contracts are fully functional for at least six months. This has long-term potential, but a rocky short-term. Against this backdrop, we assign a score of 4 out of 10.
Learn more/sign up for whitelist here.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock
ICO Analysis: CanYa
CanYa is offering a platform for the exchange of peer-to-peer services.
Users can load their CanYa wallets with the ERC20 CanYaCoin token, in addition to several support fiat currencies.
Users will be able to instantly pay for services on a global and local level. The platform supports peer-to-peer services and relies on users to self-curate and verify new types of services and providers.
Providers can earn CanYaCoins for their services, and can spend these coins within the app, or convert and send them to their Bitcoin or Ethereum wallet using CanYa’s network of zero-fee exchanges. Once users are verified, they can withdraw immediately to a fiat bank account without having to pay fees or transaction limits.
The CanYa platform also claims to help the best providers rise to the top and get more exposure and work.
**It’s important to note that the CanYa ICO cannot accept participation from US citizens unless you qualify as “accredited investors.”
CanYa was founded in 2015 with the goal of created a true peer-to-peer platform with no intermediary, based on meritocracy, and a seamless interface connecting the digital world with the real one.
The whitepaper claims the project moved from concept in 2015 to development in 2016 and then a successful soft-launch in 2017 in a small Australian market.
There are currently 3,400 provider listings with roughly 7,600 user engaging on the platform, with monthly growth in double digits.
Based in Australia, the founding team includes Rowan Willson, Christopher McLoughlin, JP Thor, Jet Yap, and a handful of other promising team members and advisors. Their work thus far is promising, although I do naturally have my hesitations about tackling a project of this scope and creating significant traction out of Australia.
Tokens and Distribution
CanYa is aiming to raise 29,333 ETH by offering 34,000,000 CanYaCoins for public sale.
These funds are being used to integrate the cryptocurrency payment layer, provide liquidity for the hedged escrow contract, expand features and “undertake an aggressive global launch with marketing, translations and infrastructure.”
There will be around 100,000,000 tokens in circulation, with a hard cap of 60,000,000 CanYaCoins for sale. A total of 26,000,000 CanYaCoins are going to be sold privately to “strategic investors who bring long-term value to the project”. These private investors incur vesting schedules from three months to 12 months. A total of 34,000,000 CanYaCoins will be sold during the public sale that started in November.
The token offering will only accept ECH.
- Onboarding new crypto-enabled merchants poses a substantial bottleneck. Freelancers and workers-for-hire flock to where the money is, and if CanYa has any shortage of jobs available, they will stick to traditional methods. Onboarding new crypto-enabled merchants will require substantial marketing work and is hindered by the learning curve that comes with acquiring and spending cryptocurrencies. -2
- Competitors in the digital service industry could pose a substantial threat to user acquisition. While CanYa poses a huge benefit of much lower transaction fees, platforms such as UpWork and Fiverr have already dumped a ton of resources and money to grow, and it might be difficult to catch up without an extensive marketing plan. -3
- Peer-to-peer networks at scale have always been burdened with some sort of third-party making a commission off the transaction, and this is a very applicable use of smart contracts to replace those intermediaries. The intermediary commissions (from the platforms to the payment services) add up to the tune of billions globally. +3
- CanYa resonates with its ideal user base. This project also happens to target the same userbase that is perhaps the most crypto-savvy segment of the world: Internet entrepreneurs. This seems like an easy target to launch an active user-base. +2
- The value add the CanYa platform offers over other services such as UpWork is pretty attractive. UpWork, for example, charges freelancers 20% of their total contract price up to $500 and then 10% up to $10,000. A freelancer seeing the option to work on a similar platform and essentially make 20% more money is an easy sell. +3
- The platform is incredibly detailed and well-thought out in the whitepaper. This is one of the few ICO products I can actually see myself using on a daily basis, provided the CanYa team is able to attract a significant amount of users on both ends. +2
- The CanYa team shows a willingness to stick with the project long-term, and even champions the cause with a “CanYa HODL club” by rewarding holders of more than 5000 CAN tokens at the ICO with perks of being in the HODL club. +2
As someone that has done freelance work and hired multiple freelancers for various projects, I can appreciate a project like CanYa. I also think it’s cool how the CanYa platform also works for real-life services.
We arrive at a score of 7 out of 10 for the CanYa ICO.
Overall, the whitepaper and marketing materials for CanYa are very thorough and easy to go through, showing a much appreciated effort by the CanYa team to make their ICO easier to understand and palatable for average investors.
You can find more details about the CanYa ICO here.
**It’s important to note that the CanYa ICO cannot accept participation from US citizens unless you qualify as “accredited investors.”
You can find the ICO whitepaper here. The sale opened Nov. 26, 2017 and will run through Dec. 26.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.
- Trade Recommendation: Buy EVHC and EQT on Selling Exhaustion on
- Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin Cash on
- Asian Market Update – Tuesday: Litecoin price skyrockets despite creator’s warning; Asian stocks down on
- Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin Cash on
- Technical Analysis: Litecoin Continues Surge as Bitcoin Tests Highs on
- Technical Analysis: Bitcoin Grinds Higher as Records Tumble in Altcoins December 13, 2017
- Bitcoin Proxy Shares Rise Following Launch of CBOE Futures Contract December 13, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Siacoin December 12, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Buy EVHC and EQT on Selling Exhaustion December 12, 2017
- Will CME and CBOE Change the Course of Bitcoin Trading? December 12, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin Cash December 12, 2017
- Is Bitcoin Stealing Gold’s Luster? December 12, 2017
- Asian Market Update – Tuesday: Litecoin price skyrockets despite creator’s warning; Asian stocks down December 12, 2017
- Is Bitcoin Driving Gold Prices Lower? December 12, 2017
- Monero Forges Ahead as Prices Cross $290 December 12, 2017
A part of CCN
Analysis3 days ago
Long-Term Cryptocurrency Analysis: Look Out Below?
Altcoins1 week ago
IOTA Doing Big Things as Microsoft Partnership Announced
Recommendations4 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Litecoin
Analysis1 week ago
$100 Litecoin Looks Poised for Greater Upside
Cryptocurrencies1 week ago
Trade Recommendation: Neo
Cryptocurrencies4 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Stellar
Cryptocurrencies3 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Zcash
Cryptocurrencies6 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Siacoin