ICO Analysis: adToken

The problem of digital content has long been foremost on the list of those which can be addressed by the blockchain and cryptocurrency. Without someone paying for the creation of good content, there would be very little of it available. In the beginning of the Internet days, there was not even a secure way to transact over the Internet, let alone the mechanisms to secure its contents. because of that, the idea of paid subscriptions was incredibly hard to swallow, though over the years it has matured in the form of premium services and the likes of Netflix. Thus, advertising is still the dominant way that content online is paid for, and the creators of adToken don’t see that changing in the future. Rather, the problem they intend to address is not the method of paying for the content, but the fraudulent conditions in which advertisers currently are forced to operate.

As CPM rates have declined, downstream publishers and those who rely on advertising have begun resorting to cheating the algorithms with bots which can mimic human behavior and falsify traffic statistics. The decreasing cost of these methods has made the average advertising dollar of a given firm far less effective, as it’s said in the adToken Whitepaper:

Ad buyers are increasingly frustrated by having their money stolen. While programmatic ad buying is undoubtedly the path forward for quantifying the value of ad buys relative to direct dealing and is the highest growth area of digital advertising, programmatic is, at present, a morass for quantifying efficacy in advertising non-installable goods. The behaviors of humans on web pages are easily mimicked by bots and the flagging of bot network signatures is essentially a cat and mouse game. This leaves advertisers mostly powerless against the incentive structure of the downstream supply chain.

The solution that adToken presents is a registry of valid publishers who are not scamming the system for ad buyers to consult. Applications can be made and challenged in a decentralized manner and changed later on through the same governance model. The idea is that by becoming involved and moderately exposed in the adToken economy, ad buyers will save money long-term by only dealing with publishers who have been verified as honest. Additionally, the governance model is also used to change constants in the same; meaning that the periods for challenging new domain entries or the period of validity can be changed by token holders.

The Economics of Virtue

The purpose of the registry will be to provide value to ad buyers, so the whole system will rely on honesty and virtue from its participants. If a bad domain is submitted and no one challenges it, for instance, then the whole system can be tainted, with that bad domain siphoning funds and giving adToken a bad reputation. However, this point clearly illustrates a more important one: the incentive for adToken holders themselves to desecrate the system is not there because it will inevitably affect the exchange value of their token. Therefore, as a liability, this is limited in terms of rational self-interest to outside parties who likely have a competing service.

However, adToken does not appear to be trying to monopolize the digital advertising verification through the cryptography sphere. Instead, applicants will also be able to indicate if they are accepting Basic Attention Tokens as well, which are part a similar effort operated by Brave Software that is also creating a browser, which will allow web users to earn money for allowing advertising through.

The economics of virtue appear faulty at first glance, but when one thinks about it a bit deeper, one sees that it can be viable. For instance, a single attack of the kind outlined above would result in significant governance changes within the system. Perhaps a mandatory challenge/review would then be introduced, in which someone actually has to prove the site has never engaged in botvertising.

The voting process is interesting. The applicant provides a domain and an adToken deposit.Then, there is a challenge period during which another person can put up an equal deposit as a challenge. If a challenge is present, adToken holders are able to put up tokens to vote against or for the application. If the application fails, the person who challenged it receives half the deposit they put up, and everyone who voted in their favor also receives an even dispensation from the other half. The applicant loses all their deposit, but anyone who voted in favor of them receives their own voting deposit back.

This does leave the system vulnerable, still, to attackers with large bank rolls. However, one can guess that the parties with the most interest in this platform succeeding have deeper pockets than those who fear its success. One is a group which must resort to fraud to profit, the other is a group which simply wants its advertising dollars to effectively perform (by actually reaching humans instead of robots). From the whitepaper:

Token holders have one concern, which is to flag fraudulent and low quality applicants to the pool and win votes to reject those applications.

The adChain Team

adToken itself is actually a conglomerate of various operations, including ConsenSys, MetaX, the Data & Marketing Association, and the adChain Association. The DMA obviously has little technical input on the project, but having their backing earns this project significant credit, as it is their purview to better the conditions for their industry. The team is composed of elements of ConsenSys and MetaX, beginning with Mike Goldin, who works full-time at ConsenSys and had previously interned there during college a couple years ago. He has to his credit a successful smart contract for something called Ujo Music, which operates in the same space as several others regarding the identification, licensing, and payment of music artists.

Their primary development efforts seem to be at the behest of Miguel Morales, who works at MetaX and has worked at two other software-focused firms in the past. Morales is a highly competent developer. In relation to this current project, he recently wrote a tutorial regarding interactive bid requests.

In advisory roles, they have Shailin Dhar and Raleigh Harbour, both of whom share massive experience in the digital advertising world. Dhar is the author of an influential document on the subject, while Harbour formerly worked for AOL, who pioneered the industry early on, becoming one of the first important and sizable advertising networks.

Presumably, the team will rely on the vast human resources of ConsenSys and MetaX for actual development, so the significant lack of highly-technical people listed in their team section does not necessarily equate to technical debt. The major organs of this project will function in management and advertising anyway, since getting the word out to publishers and advertisers will be paramount in the success of the platform.

Investment Details

The adToken crowdsale will go live via Ethereum only on June 26th at 9 AM Pacific time. 500 million tokens will be for sale that day, with 100 million already being sold in pre-sale funding arrangements. An additional 400 million are split evenly between MetaX and ConsenSys, for a total of 1 billion coins in the economy.

This distribution is arguably a red flag, in traditional ICO analyses, due to the high level of coins that are not being released to the public. The least they could have done is pull the 100 million tokens they used for fundraising already from the 400 million being distributed between the firms, correcting the balance so that the majority are in the wild, while 40% remain in the citadel. Instead, 10% are unknown, 50% are in the public, and 40% are held by the founders. The pre-sale arrangements could be fictional or falsified, as well, making the thing suspicious on these grounds. In general, a small pre-mine or with-holding is acceptable to fund development, but the coins should be left to the market by and large for value and legitimacy.

A more in-depth map of the distribution is here:

No real information on how to actually invest is present yet, but presumably, that information will be available on June 26th. However, the site does say a MetaX GUI for participating will be built in the meantime. You can sign up for a reminder at the adToken website. A specified starting price has not been listed, but it does not that only the sending address will be able to receive the tokens, so do not fund the investment with an exchange account that you do not control.

The Verdict

adToken is a great idea with limited drawbacks. Let’s go over the drawbacks:

  • Potentially lots of others in the space, creating a sense of attrition in terms of growth. If a site cannot get whitelisted at adToken, perhaps it can somewhere else. This could lead to confusion in the market, and mean that reputation will be the primary factor in the value of adTokens. If this happens, the trajectory of the token itself could be straight up or down.
  • The vulnerability of deep-pocketed attackers from other whitelist operations or those who benefit from the problem’s existence. Penetrating the reputability of adChain would not be trivial, but could be possible. The system relies on there being enough active, rational participants to ensure against these types of denigrations. Anytime such problems were to arise, other plays in this market would have an opportunity.
  • The period between launch and gaining a reputation as a way for advertisers to actually save money and as something they should participate in could be prolonged, which means that the token and project themselves could be overshadowed by later efforts that get luckier in the beginning.

All of these things being the case, people could still profit in adChain. If you wanted to make money on the side, picking up some adTokens and making it your businesses to challenge faulty domains could be profitable. Entire firms could be built around this concept, and confederations of such firms could raise oceans so all ships float higher. The value of adTokens themselves will ultimately be determined by how badly submitters – publishers – want them, so the more of this virtuous work you did, the better the platform and higher the value of the token would be. This is somewhat unique in terms of tokens and cryptocurrencies, in a sense that the holder is not entirely powerless to influence the value of the token; instead, by doing good work, the holder can potentially increase the value of the token.

Of course, you’re also relying on the notion that others will do this by signing on. This is problematic. It’s not all there is to it, though, but let’s dock two points based on that fact. Now we’re at 8 remaining. We’ll take another half point for the risk of non-self-correction, another full point for 500 million tokens withheld from the market, and call adToken, as a whole, 65% safe in terms of likelihood of recouping your investment.

This is not a guarantee in any sense. Just as Exscudo appears to be moving forward without any issues, despite the concerns of this writer, adToken could fall flat on its face and receive no interest at all, thereby devaluing your purchased tokens to nothing at all. But given the assessment above, this seems unlikely.

 

 

 

Author:

Website: http://phm.link

P. H. Madore has covered the cryptocurrency beat over the course of hundreds of articles for Hacked's sister site, CryptoCoinsNews, as well as some of her competitors. He is a major contributing developer to the Woodcoin project, and has made technical contributions on a number of other cryptocurrency projects. In spare time, he recently began a more personalized, weekly newsletter at http://ico.phm.link