Connect with us

Opinion

DFINITY is the Third Wave of Blockchain

Published

on

The use of blockchain technology is rapidly proliferating, and it has already become a strong candidate to be the most revolutionary technology of this decade.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

The first generation of blockchain technology came with the invention of bitcoin by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2008. It depended heavily on a virtual ledger, which keeps track of all transactions and balances. Six years later, Ethereum was conceived as a means by which the technology could be given more advanced uses. Rather than simply acting as a ledger, Ethereum was designed to be a shared virtual “world computer”.

The Next Generation

Being tamper-proof and robust are the two defining features of these technologies, and the result is the invention of decentralized platforms that no longer require trust. Anyone who uses them can be sure the data being communicated is correct and safe. This is where the true advancements are.

The next limitation in blockchain technology is likely to be the ability to have artificial intelligence (AI) on demand. Rather than having to depend upon complex building blocks like databases or Amazon Web Services, it will be possible to create scalable business applications

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD. Click here to change your current membership -- //

DFINITY is the leader in this market, and is working hard to bring an advanced public decentralized cloud computing resource to market. Improved performance and unlimited capacity will help bring about a 90% cut in costs to the projects implemented on it.

Disruption Coming From DFINITY

With many of the other innovations occurring in this space, the innovation is in the reduced costs due to a more efficient method of performing the transactions. With DFINITY, the costs come in the reduction of IT resources required to set up and manage many of these services. Artificial intelligence is reaching a point where many of the most basic IT functions can be replaced by it.

There are two main directions by which DFINITY can go. The obvious route is to disrupt all of the current dominant players who depend upon their ability to be scalable intermediaries (eBay, Facebook, Uber, Airbnb, etc.). This is nearly every single one of the most powerful companies to emerge in the last few years. There is even a potential for Google to be disrupted if it can be engineered into a clearly more efficient and benevolent resource. All of this is possible with the use of autonomous software that runs on a decentralized governance system that is capable of updating itself.

The non-obvious route for DFINITY to take is completely disrupting enterprise IT systems by cutting costs through the replacement of human resources. Amazon Web Services is a cloud service that is currently the dominant provider of cloud services, but if DFINITY could provide a similar service at a lower cost and not require the same level of human capital to manage and build these systems, it would decimate the incumbents.

As a company with unlimited potential in terms of capacity, the true priorities of the company are now more focused towards building security, speed, and scale. Their current aims are to achieve 1 million or more mining clients while also improving the performance to a point that is much superior to anything else available on the market today.

Finality is just one measure of the user experience and security, but by implementing Threshold relay chains, the current limitations may be addressed in a way that could bring the time it takes to finalize transactions down to 5-10 seconds. This would represent a significant improvement over the 10 minutes it takes on Ethereum and nearly 60 minutes on the Bitcoin network.

DFINITY and Their Mission

There is currently no whitepaper available for DFINITY, but it is expected to be made available soon. The mission of DFINITY is loftier than almost anything else in the cryptocurrency world, and because of that it has to run on a different timeline. Decentralized intelligence would allow the system to make arbitrary changes to itself in order to mitigate any misuse, while also fixing problems and optimizing the overall network experience. There is no current news about when the ICO will be but management originally planned for it to be in late 2017.

Based in Zug, Switzerland and run as a not-for-profit foundation, DFINITY will follow a different path from most of the other blockchain-based companies you will read about. Beta tests are underway, and the project is currently run by a large team of researchers that work full-time to try and bring this solution to market.

A company’s likelihood of succeeding isn’t just based upon the quality of the idea, but also the quality of the team. DFINITY’s team is top-notch and has a high degree of expertise both within the crypto world and the start-up world. Based on this, the future of DFINITY is bright, but will require a lot of work to get off the ground.

Disclaimer: The analyst does not have investments in DFINITY.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock,

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
8 votes, average: 4.88 out of 58 votes, average: 4.88 out of 58 votes, average: 4.88 out of 58 votes, average: 4.88 out of 58 votes, average: 4.88 out of 5 (8 votes, average: 4.88 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

3.6 stars on average, based on 9 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Opinion

How Monetary Goods Compare: Bitcoin, Gold and the U.S. Dollar

Published

on

One of the most common arguments against the value of cryptocurrencies, and monetary ones like bitcoin in particular, is how they compare to current assets. Gold and the U.S. dollar are the two counter-examples which get used the most, which is why it can be helpful to compare each of their attributes to figure out where each one shines.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

Monetary goods can be compared on a few different terms. Gold was the original “money,” but we presently use fiat currency, and are talking about the bitcoin as being the future of monetary assets.

Scarcity and Verifiability

The first thing that needs to be compared is whether they are scarce or not. In this regard, fiat currency is actually the least scarce. The last few decades have seen many politicians print more money to create short-term solutions, but this means the scarcity is almost non-existent.

Gold fares better, as there is a limited amount available at any time, but if there were any innovations in mining technology, the supply could increase immediately. Bitcoin is actually the most scarce (despite what detractors might say) because there will only ever be 21 million bitcoins and the schedule of their mining is relatively fixed.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD. Click here to change your current membership -- //

In terms of verifiability, bitcoin also beats both gold and fiat currency. Counterfeits of both exist, but there are no passable counterfeits for bitcoin. In terms of durability, gold triumphs over all since it is relatively robust, but fiat can be destroyed quite easily. Bitcoin falls in the middle, as it can be destroyed if the network is destroyed or the private keys are lost.

Portability

This plays in a bit with being scarce and verifiable, but is most of all about the ability to cross borders with the coin or send money all the way across the world. It is hard to argue that gold or fiat currency are easier to do either of these with.

The capital controls and government regulations present in the world make it very hard to send fiat currency to other countries. However, with cryptocurrency, you can just put the money on a USB drive and go anywhere.

Censorship Resistance

One of the key factors that makes bitcoin so powerful is its inability to be censored or controlled. The First Amendment is all about free speech and the right to say what you want, and there needs to be a corresponding right that applies to currencies. Being able to fund what you wish without gaining the permission of another entity is what makes the network so valuable.

The presence of gatekeepers in the fiat system is a lot of what has created such strong demand for a censorship resistant currency. Governments have outlawed certain uses of currency (e.g. illicit drugs or sex trafficking), which is clearly a good for the world. But at the same time, if one was trying to flee China, it would not be possible to do so while maintaining a hold on all their fiat currency. This is where the opportunity for bitcoin begins.

Understanding Monetization

Now that we’ve compared these goods on several different dimensions, we can see that bitcoin has merit compared to gold or USD in some respects. The only thing that it lacks is an established history, having been created in 2009. This is important because it enables the path from inception to widespread use. which is referred to as monetization. The process can take a long time, but there are a few things we can expect.

The prices will naturally continue to go up above the intrinsic value of the good, as a monetary premium is necessary. Monetary premiums are the difference between the market value and intrinsic value of a cryptocurrency. A dollar is worth far more than the paper it is printed on and the utility of a bar of gold is less than 10% of its current market value.

The increases in price are expected, since each monetary good must rise above its intrinsic value to a market derived value. Bubbles are a standard part of the monetization process, which is counter-intuitive to what we’ve heard so far. This can look like a bubble to doubters, but it is only a bubble if it pops. If it doesn’t it is just the market searching for an appropriate monetary premium for the cryptocurrency. In the end, there is no objectively correct monetary good in the world and network effects and evangelization are key.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 52 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

3.6 stars on average, based on 9 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Opinion

The Principles of Money and How You Should Think of Bitcoin

Published

on

To really understand bitcoin and what it aims to do, you need to understand what money is. The two terms that get thrown around a lot in regards to whether bitcoin or any other digital currency is a good investment are “medium of transfer” and “store of value”. These are important components of monetary assets, but aren’t the end of the conversation.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

What Makes a Monetary Good

There are three main purposes you need to think of when you determine how useful a monetary good is: medium of exchange, store of value and unit of account.

Store of value means that users are comfortable storing their wealth in terms of that monetary good. This is generally a sign of stability and trust in the long-term value of the monetary good.

Next, you have medium of transfer, which is basically a “cash” use case. Everyone is willing to transfer value to each other by using the asset. They might not necessarily hold this for long, but it is widely used enough that you can trust in its usefulness.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD. Click here to change your current membership -- //

The less heard of quality for a currency to have is being a unit of account. This means that people value their goods in terms of that particular currency. If you were to ask someone how much something costs, chances are they would quote the value in terms of their local currency. That makes the local currency the unit of account.

Right now, bitcoin is not a unit of account because there is no set bitcoin price a good would be sold in. Instead, you have values quoted based on the current BTC/USD exchange rate, which is very different.

The Path of Monetary Evolution

It can take decades for a good to go through the full evolution of its use as a monetary good, and that use can change with shifts in the economy. For example, gold would have been used for all three purposes, but is now only used as a store of value. Similarly, PayPal captured the medium of transfer use case, but never developed a meaningful solution to become a unit of account or store of value.

So where is bitcoin now? Based on the way it is being traded, it is mostly a store of value. In the beginning, there were lots of situations where users would spend bitcoin on trivial objects, but now with the meme “HODL” and the number of rabid bitcoin supporters, it is mostly a long-term investment.

This is the standard path a new monetary good takes. Nobody would want to use it as a medium of transfer because the value is fluctuating so much that it is infeasible for daily use. Until the equilibrium amount of demand for the good comes online and the price somewhat stabilizes, it is unlikely to become a medium of transfer. The same applies to unit of account, as mentioned above.

No Defined Outcome

A common gripe against bitcoin is that it is not a useful currency because it does not fulfill the store of value condition, but this ignores the shortcomings of fiat currency. Nobody holds more than a small proportion of their net worth in fiat, because it is not a good store of value. Inflation is constantly eroding the value of the currency and that is its core weakness.

Additionally, when you look at unstable countries, such as Argentina, there are multiple monetary assets in use. They use the Argentinian peso as a medium of transfer, but opt for the US dollar as a store of value.

So there is no defined outcome for bitcoin’s evolution. It doesn’t have to fulfill all the use cases for it to be useful, it just has to be better than our current options for a use case.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
2 votes, average: 2.00 out of 52 votes, average: 2.00 out of 52 votes, average: 2.00 out of 52 votes, average: 2.00 out of 52 votes, average: 2.00 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 2.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

3.6 stars on average, based on 9 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Opinion

Institutional Interest in Cryptocurrency Is Rising, and It Is Not Surprising

Published

on

The multi-week rally in cryptocurrencies has not gone unnoticed by the world’s major financial institutions. According to a recent survey conducted by Thompson Reuters, one in five traditional financiers is considering cryptocurrency trading as early as this year.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

A Compelling Study

In a survey of more than 400 financial firms, researchers at Thompson Reuters concluded that institutional trading of cryptocurrencies could rise substantially this year. Among those that indicated a willingness to trade digital assets, 70% are planning to do so in the next three-to-six months. An additional 22% is planning to enter the market between six and 12 months from now.

The survey provides actual figures on a phenomenon we’ve observed since the cryptocurrency market bull rally began – namely, that banks are closely examining client interest in the digital asset class to determine an appropriate entry point. Some are farther along than others, such as hedge funds already trading cryptos and Goldman Sachs, which is already building its digital asset division.

Interest is likely to rise further as cryptocurrencies appreciate in value. The market peaked at $437.4 billion on Tuesday, a gain of nearly $190 billion from the Apr. 6 swing low. At current levels, the cryptocurrency market is at roughly half of its all-time high.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD. Click here to change your current membership -- //

Changing the Conversation

The results of the survey also challenge the underlying assumption that banks are only interested in blockchain and not the currencies that run on them. While this may have been true 12 months ago, cryptocurrencies have emerged as a viable asset class that provide alternatives to the current system.

However, opponents of cryptocurrency still get hung up on arguments over the intrinsic value of digital assets. They often invoke rhetorical questions like what’s bitcoin actually worth?  Of course, the same question can be directed at fiat currency, whose authority rests with the state but whose value depreciates almost yearly due to inflation.

That’s the conclusion researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis reached three months ago in a primer on cryptocurrencies. In addition to arguing that bitcoin “could over time assume a similar role as gold,” researchers Aleksander Berentsen and Fabian Schar reminded readers that “state monopoly currencies, such as the U.S. dollar, the euro, and the Swiss franc, have no intrinsic value either.”

While bitcoin’s short history has been filled with wild swings, the history of “state monopoly currencies” isn’t much different when taken as a whole. (An extreme yet true example: Zimbabwe’s national currency got inflated out of existence a few years ago.) As we’ve seen repeatedly throughout history, states can’t always convince the public that their currency is worth more than the paper or cotton it is printed on.

“This is why decentralized cryptocurrencies are a welcome addition to the existing currency system,” the researchers said.

The findings of the Reuters survey may not amount to much in the grand scheme of things, but in the meantime do provide a new starting point for how we debate institutional interest in cryptocurrency.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.5 stars on average, based on 403 rated postsSam Bourgi is Chief Editor to Hacked.com, where he specializes in cryptocurrency, economics and the broader financial markets. Sam has nearly eight years of progressive experience as an analyst, writer and financial market commentator where he has contributed to the world's foremost newscasts.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending