Connect with us

Bitcoin

Valuing Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Applications

Published

on

Arguably the most interesting financial trend of 2017 is the spreading of cryptocurrencies, especially in the Ethereum ecosystem. With the ICO boom of this year, a lot of different business models have been connected to tokens or blockchains of their own. This brings up several questions in the mind value-conscious investors, as given the special properties of these coins, and especially considering the various distribution and usage schemes of the tokens, valuing them is tricky, to say the least.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

Whether or not we are in a bubble currently is a layered question, as we are definitely in a huge speculative wave that will end badly for several coins, but the segment is in the early phase of adoption, and the market as a whole will likely multiply in the coming years.

As I concluded in my comparison with the Dot-Com bubble, selective investing in the ICO-boom is vital for long-term investors. To make things more complicated, traditional valuation models generally fail with cryptocurrencies, because of the hybrid stock-commodity properties of them and the novelty of the technology, coupled with the questions regarding the future usage patterns.

Is it possible to set up a framework to analyze all the different business models and value the connected coins? Or is it possible to, at least, determine hard guidelines to follow when selecting the coins to hold or forget? I will answer that question below and in the coming second part of the article.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD and get access to our secret group on Workplace. Click here to change your current membership -- //

Where is the Value Coming From?

Valuing Cryptocurrencies

For a traditional analyst, the most interesting question is the source of the value of the tokens. There are several crucial hurdles to clear for a token to be considered valuable on the long-run. Why? Firstly, because as opposed to stocks, holding a token doesn’t give you ownership in the company conducting the ICO, thus the success of the company doesn’t directly increase the value of the coin.

Also, the fact that the blockchain technology and all the main patents and methods are freely available to the public means that an infinite number of tokens and blockchains can be created with no legal hurdle, possibly making the competition fierce, decimating demand for the services behind the token and in turn the token itself.

Another problem with the current ICOs is that even if the idea behind the company is valid, and the demand for the token is organic (we will get back to this soon), there is no guarantee that the execution of the idea won’t be obsolete in a matter of months, let alone years. This is one of the main reasons that a lot of Dot-Com companies failed; it’s nice to be a revolutionary player, but more often than not, markets are ruled by the second or third generation of companies that annihilate the pioneers of a technology, leaving only the nostalgy behind.

Non-Ownership Sources of Value

Of course, besides ownership (which is non-existent in most of the current models) there are several ways that the token can acquire value. The most important, in my opinion, is the organic demand for them, that, together with the inherently limited supply can create an imbalance between demand and supply, driving the price of the “digital commodity” higher.

For the holders of the tokens, a lot of projects also deploy some kind of fixed or variable “rent” or “dividend” (yikes). I am, maybe too much so, skeptical regarding these premiums, as they present an extra cost somewhere in the ecosystem that will create immense incentives to create cheaper “rent-free” alternatives for the given business. So, the existence of such a system, while it might be intriguing, in my opinion, could be the exact reason why that the business will fail. But there is a catch; if a model is strong enough to survive and dominate a, sometimes completely new niche, it could be able to sustain these premiums and give a huge boost to the value of the token. But what will set these winners apart from the rest?

Network Effects

Valuing Cryptocurrencies using network effects

To answer that question, we have to note that both of the above sources of value are based strongly on the network effects. This, sometimes elusive, term is used to describe why in some industries the winner takes all (or at least most of the profits), and some companies enjoy a “natural” monopolistic position.

Think Facebook for social networks, Microsoft for OSs, or a landline phone company in the past. Adding more users to such networks not only decreases the cost of operation per user but actually increases the utility that all (yes, this is a huge simplification here, you geeks out there) users enjoy through the network. Translating that to products according to this great summary:

A product displays positive network effects when more usage of the product by any user increases the product’s value for other users (and sometimes all users)

This makes these networks multiple times more valuable than other ecosystems that don’t sport sustainable network effects. Understanding these effects is very important for judging the future demand for blockchain applications and tokens, and not only because it’s a widely used buzzword in whitepapers, sometimes to blur and ridicule any and every concern regarding the business model. But before we take a closer look at network effects, let’s see the logic behind my valuation approach.

The Logic of Determining The Value of Applications and Tokens

We have to stress that this is only a basic filter, but one that has great heuristical value to move forward in the analysis. According to Fortune:

Jeff Garzik, a leading figure in the blockchain community who runs a consultancy called Bloq, sees ICOs as “transformative” but remains wary. “Ninety-nine percent of these ICOs will be garbage,” he says. “It’s like penny stocks but with less regulation.”

While the 99% might be a bit rough, it is safe to say that most of the current ICOs will end up left behind, while the survivors will multiply several times in value and create the infrastructure for a new crop of businesses that will thrive in the blossoming industry. Still, investors’ primary job in such a nascent segment is to efficiently filter out obvious and less obvious scams, losers, and laggards. For that, the first step is to really understand what’s driving the revolution in the first place.

The Most Important Advantages of the Blockchain Technology

In order to create a framework for valuing cryptocurrencies, we have to be, at least vaguely, aware of the current and possible use cases of the technology. The novelty of the tech makes this very hard and in some cases impossible, but if we keep track of the main advantages of the blockchain we can identify projects and business models that are built upon the real strength of the technology rather than on the hype.

  • Permanent and verified transaction records
  • Simplified databases and tracking functionalities
  • Lower transaction costs and times
  • Security of a decentralized and redundant system
  • Peer-to-peer transmissions
  • Smart-contract logic: rule-based business models and ecosystems

Matching these virtues with the business models is only the first step; while you can identify potential winners, aligning with the strength of the technology doesn’t mean that a venture will be a long-term winner, not to mention the exact “valuation” of the token. These advantages will also take effect in several different levels of the economy, from private, limited user-base blockchains to global transformational systems that might be used by the majority of the citizens of the world. You can see a model of adoption with examples below from the great article of Marco Iansiti and Karim Lakhani.

The Adoption Cycle’s Role in Valuing Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Applications

While that sounds chilling and revolutionary, there is an investment problem here; even if you went back to the 80’s with the knowledge about Google, you couldn’t have directly invested in the company, as not only the founders of the firm were in kindergarten, the infrastructure that the business was based was non-existent. So are we in the 80’s of the blockchain technology? Well, in a way yes, global transformational adoption will likely take at least another decade. That said, my gut feeling is that this adoption cycle, although it will resemble the Internet’s will provide huge surprises; both positive and negative ones.

The Looming Coin-Regulation Storm

It’s hard to overstate the regulatory hurdles that the segment will soon face. The ICOs legal framework is shaky, to say the least, and somehow regulators will try to curb the boom and divert in into a more traditional direction. And in a lot of ways, that would be good for investors as well. A more regulated market would be beneficial in avoiding scams, while letting the currently left-out investors participate in the rise of the new industry.

For the current crop of coins, this is probably the biggest risks out there, as whole ICOs could be deemed illegal, leaving holders of the tokens out in the cold, or facing an uncertain transition into another legal framework that would likely push the value of the ventures and the tokens down.

In the next part of the article, I will take a look at this and other risks that blockchains and systems built upon them face. I will also set-up actionable guidelines to weigh the advantages and the risks of certain applications and cryptocurrencies while forecasting the actual demand for the service and the attached token. To make it more robust, I will integrate some of the traditional valuation methods as well.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is concidered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...



Feedback or Requests?

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. icm_24

    July 12, 2017 at 3:49 pm

    can’t wait for the rest. the current crypto market is really depressing and I could use some light at the end of this deep dark tunnel.

  2. Chris G

    July 12, 2017 at 4:07 pm

    In spite of the price crash in Ethereum, I def. still see plenty of potential applied value in that coin. I have a solid long-term position, and set up a modest mining operation to hedge volatility. I’m confident that my equipment investment will be covered in a reasonable time-frame, and am viewing Ethereum within a 3-5 year investment window.

    My largest long-term position is in Litecoin, I really think the Litecoin development team is ahead of the curve. Particularly in terms of scalability confounds, my money is on Litecoin.

  3. pradz

    July 12, 2017 at 5:06 pm

    This article came right out of the caution cauldron where excitement was previously prepped. It pinches the excitement out of cryptocurrencies and gives the reader less legroom(in emotion) for those wanting to really go all out, given the current uncertainty in the market.

    But the 10 year universal adoption is almost possible, maybe even faster, since the infrastructure is in place and we’re still figuring out the networking part, while the answer might lie within the mind of a kindergartner who could well go on to create a bigger tech that gobbles up alt coins like m&m’s.

    Nice piece Mate Cser, wonder where you’ll be in 2027 rewinding all your predictions that went right and those that didn’t. One things’ for sure – Interesting times ahead.

    • Mate Cser

      July 12, 2017 at 5:20 pm

      Hi Pradz,

      I am as excited as ever for the segment, I truly believe blockchain tech is huge thing for productivity growth, which is the key for the coming demographic “autumn”. I have my money in the sector, mostly in BTC and ETH with a few smaller bets elsewhere.

      That said, I am not a believer in predicting the future, just probabilites, and placing careful investments according to them, that’s the point of these articles.

      I hope to be here in 2027,discussing our investments in hindsight. That’s real fun 🙂

    • Chris G

      July 12, 2017 at 7:00 pm

      I particularly like the m&m metaphor *chuckle* …

  4. Chris G

    July 12, 2017 at 8:08 pm

    Nice to see a little ethereum bounce today – wake me up when we hit $1000 🙂 …

    • gafty

      July 12, 2017 at 11:44 pm

      1000 at the end of the year will be for sure!

      • Chris G

        July 13, 2017 at 2:38 pm

        that’d sure be nice 😉

  5. csinkey

    July 13, 2017 at 2:05 am

    Mate Czar – would you share your “smaller bets”? I’m REALLY interested to see which ones you thought were worth taking a bet on given the above thinking

  6. P. H. Madore

    July 24, 2017 at 12:06 am

    “For the holders of the tokens, a lot of projects also deploy some kind of fixed or variable “rent” or “dividend” (yikes). I am, maybe too much so, skeptical regarding these premiums, as they present an extra cost somewhere in the ecosystem that will create immense incentives to create cheaper “rent-free” alternatives for the given business. So, the existence of such a system, while it might be intriguing, in my opinion, could be the exact reason why that the business will fail. But there is a catch; if a model is strong enough to survive and dominate a, sometimes completely new niche, it could be able to sustain these premiums and give a huge boost to the value of the token. But what will set these winners apart from the rest?”

    If the payment is fixed and not dependent on the actual revenues of the firm in question, of course issuing p2p shares through tokenization is a mistake. However, if the dividend payment — part of the proceeds intended to keep the network afloat, not bloated costs — is built into the business model and the figure is reasonable, it’s more of a shareholder + situation. Not only do you have a stake in the firm, but you have premium access to its innards, and, as you mention, limited supply makes you the holder of a potentially even more valuable commodity. Yes, we’ve seen that proof of stake and interest rates do encourage people to horde, but this is not a problem in a supply-demand ecosystem. The cost of the services simply goes up, and the actual numerical derivative payments go down while their value goes up. As such, I think this is actually a feature we need to see more of. But it’s not the main fix that we need to see.

    The main fix that would improve ICOs in our era would be one in which they do not issue themselves any shares at all. Instead, they sell as many tokens as they wish, and buy back as much stake in the company as they wish to have from the token holders. This would mitigate so many problems it’s hard to pretend I need to justify the notion. If your goal is not to hold 100% of the company, but merely to increase its value, buying in at post-ICO rates should be no problem for you, especially since you have the most influence over what goes right and goes wrong — and if the market actually kills you, you’re a rarity. This burgeoning industry can support 100 of any given thing if all 100 are operated correctly. Unfortunately only 2 or 3 ever will be.

  7. Mate Cser

    July 24, 2017 at 7:54 am

    Thanks Paul for the addition! I still feel that this dividend model, while we agree that it’s good for the “shareholder”, is only viable if you already have a strong market position or a competitive advantage in providing the actual service that justifies the extra cost for the users.

    In a blossoming industry, you won’t see huge profits in the growth phase, and the companies have to pour everything into increasing their market share. So, if I have two similar businesses with the only difference being the dividend, I would choose the dividend-less company without a question. I would actually like to see them leveraging growth, not distributing profits; a good business should have a large ROI, why would they give back valuable capital when they see growth ahead? For me, that’s a suspicious sign.

    You are right that the industry can support 100 of any given thing, but still, there is one Facebook, Google, Microsoft… That’s where network effects come in strongly, and fierce competition is guaranteed for the leadership. I want to hold the winners, the really efficient ones (Google vs Yahoo to simplify it). And to be honest, I don’t care too much about the bad reputation of ICOs, market cycles, or bubbles as an investor, if you can choose the real winners with a good percentage and stick to them, you will be rewarded. Wait for a big correction and buy, simple as that.

    I believe that in itself issuing shares or a share-token hybrid of some sorts is not a bad thing. It’s a simple way to distribute the increase in valuation, but of course, your solution is basically the same.

  8. febrocas

    September 12, 2017 at 12:07 am

    Doesn’t seem so terrible after all.

    “According to the human resources consulting firm Challenger Gray & Christmas Inc., some 22,267 dot.com job cuts have been announced since December 1999, when the firm began tracking such data. Of the 274 companies tracked from December 1999 through October 2000, 44 of them — or 16 percent of the total — have since failed. Still, people fired from dot.coms should have no problem finding another job, said John Challenger, the company’s CEO.”

    http://money.cnn.com/2000/11/09/technology/overview/

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Altcoins

Fears of Regulatory Crackdown Flush $190 Billion Out of Crypto Market

Published

on

Bitcoin, Ethereum and every other major cryptocurrency collapsed on Tuesday, as fears of regulatory clampdown in South Korea triggered a mass exodus from the digital asset class. The collapse comes as mainstream media reports continue to push the idea of an imminent ban on cryptocurrency exchanges even as lawmakers cautioned no decision had been reached.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

Cryptocurrency Market in Free Fall

The cryptocurrency market declined rog $190 billion on Tuesday, marking one of the biggest single-day drops on record. At its lowest, the market was valued at $510 billion,  which was than $200 billion below its peak earlier this month.

The top 20 coins were each down in excess of 17%, according to data provider CoinMarketCap. Nearly $49 billion worth of cryptocurrency exchanged hands over the past 24 hours.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD and get access to our secret group on Workplace. Click here to change your current membership -- //

Bitcoin plunged below $12,000, reaching its lowest level since early December. Ethereum, its biggest rival, fell back toward $1,000, while Ripple bottomed out at $1.23 after peaking above $3 just a few weeks ago.

South Korea Jolts Market

It was mainly regulatory issues that jolted cryptocurrencies on Tuesday, with South Korea mulling new legislation to stamp out excessive risk from the market.

South Korea’s finance minister Kim Dong-yeon reportedly told local radio that an all-out ban on cryptocurrency trading was a “live option, but that government officials still need to “seriously review it.” Seoul’s biggest issue with cryptocurrency trading is the level of speculation in the market and the role of anonymous accounts in spurring volatility. New regulations have already banned anonymous trading on domestic exchanges and barred foreigners from participating in the market.

Last week, some of South Korea’s busiest crypto exchanges were raided by police and tax agents over alleged tax evasion. The raids were confirmed by an employee at Coinone, who spoke to Reuters anonymously.

Seoul’s financial authorities had previously indicated they were investigating six banks that offer cryptocurrency accounts. In addition to speculative risks, authorities are also concerned about the link between cryptocurrency trading and organized crime.

South Korea is a major center for cryptocurrency and is home to some of the largest exchanges. Local traders have been the main catalysts behind some of the crypto market’s biggest gainers, including Ripple.

Some analysts believe that further regulatory crackdown will be ineffective given the borderless nature of cryptocurrencies. When China banned cryptocurrencies, traders there migrated their accounts offshore to Hong Kong or Korea. This suggests that a regulatory crackdown can only succeed with broad international cooperation, which does not exist at the time.

Chinese regulators know that their measures have done very little to limit virtual capital flight from the country. That’s why they are moving to block domestic access to offshore exchanges, according to a recent Bloomberg report.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is concidered a failure either way.
9 votes, average: 4.78 out of 59 votes, average: 4.78 out of 59 votes, average: 4.78 out of 59 votes, average: 4.78 out of 59 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5 (9 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...



Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Analysis

Long-Term Cryptocurrency Analysis: Broad Correction Enters Next Phase

Published

on

The overbought BTC-led correction that has been the dominating technical process in the cryptocurrency segment in the last month or so continued in earnest today, amid the intensifying regulatory steps concerning the sector. The three-week-long consolidation that followed the initial mini-crash concluded with a sharp sell-off overnight rearranging the long-term charts, while likely kicking off another volatile period.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

While most of the crash lows held up today in early trading in the majors, especially in the case of the late leaders like Ethereum and NEO, some of the relatively weaker coins are already trading below the December minimums. We expect most of the majors to follow Dash and LTC, the weakest of the largest coins, lower and trade below the previous lows, as sentiment will likely swing to a bearish extreme.

The $11,300 level has been in the center of attention throughout the session today and the most valuable coin experienced heavy trading around the level as expected. As the daily MACD is still in neutral territory, the coin could be in for another leg lower, but after the 40% correction and the rather lengthy consolidation, investors could be looking for entry points during the move near the key support levels at $10,000, $9000, and the stronger levels at $8200 and $7700.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD and get access to our secret group on Workplace. Click here to change your current membership -- //

BTC/USD, Daily Chart Analysis

As Ethereum is in a different part of its cycle the long-term momentum readings are still overbought, and that could mean a more protracted correction for the second largest coin. That said, following a multi-month consolidation like the one in Ethereum before, we still expect the token to outperform BTC from a long-term technical standpoint. ETH is now below the short-term trendline, and it’s likely to dip below $1000, and the prior top at $850. Further key levels are found at $740, $625, $575, and near $500.

ETH/USD, Daily Chart Analysis

Let’s see the outlook for the other major altcoins after today’s bloodbath.

(more…)

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is concidered a failure either way.
8 votes, average: 4.63 out of 58 votes, average: 4.63 out of 58 votes, average: 4.63 out of 58 votes, average: 4.63 out of 58 votes, average: 4.63 out of 5 (8 votes, average: 4.63 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...



Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Analysis

Crypto Update: Chinese Crackdown Triggers Next Leg of Correction

Published

on

The cryptocurrency segment is crashing again, with double-digit losses across the board, and with several coins shedding around 30% in one day amid the widespread and heavy selling. The sell-off was triggered by reports on a new set of measures by the Chinese authorities limiting crypto trading, which added to the still looming South Korea related regulation worries. Bitcoin tested the mini-crash lows at $11,300 today in early trading, dipping slightly below that level before a strong bounce started.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace.

The most valuable coin is now between two crucial support/resistance lines, with the other ahead at $13,000, and as the downtrend is entering its more mature phase the $10,000 and $9,200 levels could come in play, with a possible dip to the support zone near $7,650.

BTC/USD, Daily Chart Analysis

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD and get access to our secret group on Workplace. Click here to change your current membership -- //

Interestingly, the coin is still hovering within the daily range of the crash of December 22nd, and that points to a very active and volatile period ahead near the low at $11,300, as automatic orders will likely get triggered on both sides of the market.

The short-term setup is bearish, and although it’s possible that the primary support level will hold, odds still favor another leg lower, following the exponential run-up at the end of last year that pushed sentiment into bullish extremes.

BTC/USD, 4-Hour Chart Analysis

Altcoins

(more…)

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is concidered a failure either way.
19 votes, average: 4.79 out of 519 votes, average: 4.79 out of 519 votes, average: 4.79 out of 519 votes, average: 4.79 out of 519 votes, average: 4.79 out of 5 (19 votes, average: 4.79 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...



Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending