Over Half Of All ICOs Failed In Q2 2018 Market
Icorating.com, a high-quality source for independent research into the ICO market, has published their quarterly analysis of ICOs.
There are several important findings in the report, but perhaps none more notable then the fact that 50% of ICOs failed in Q2. Icorating.com attributes this mainly to the fact that half of the projects couldn’t raise more than $100k.
Another important finding was the fact that only 7% of all announced ICO tokens were able to be listed on exchanges. They also found that there was an average 6-day listing time increase compared to last year for tokens on exchanges.
The general view of this report seems to be an increasing bifurcation of success and failure. The projects that hold successful fundraises raise enormous sums, (with EOS being the most obvious example). The ones that don’t, tend to flame out.
This is reinforced by data in the report that the top projects raised an average of $50,000,000 during the ICO. While this is an eye-popping sum, it’s worth noting that the report mentioned that average ICO duration increased by 10%. This is presumably indicative of an ICO market that is becoming less of a Wild West.
Interestingly, the actual number of projects who had an already-operating business represented only 15% of the total ICOs.
Although there does seem to be a common view in the crypto landscape that the days of just holding an ICO with a white paper and idea alone are over, the data in the report showed that whether or not an ICO was held by an existing business in Q2 had zero impact on whether or not the fundraiser was successful.
Whether this is a reflection of a still-new market that has not yet adopted accepted funding norms remains to be seen. But it does give hope to promising projects without sufficient capital, (which in theory was the entire purpose of ICOs in the first place.)
That said, projects in the idea stage did tend to aim for (and raise) less money then those with existing businesses. Specifically, these idea stage projects raised an average of $4.5 million USD/raise.
The vast majority of funding for projects came from North America, 64.67% to be exact. Asia-based projects meanwhile showed an increase in funds raised, but also showed fewer projects seeking capital overall.
This could suggest an approach of “quality not quantity” in the region, although the truth of this remains to be seen as the projects rollout.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.