New York Bill Would Mandate Backdoors into Smartphones | Hacked: Hacking Finance
user

New York Bill Would Mandate Backdoors into Smartphones

Introduction

Samburaj Das

Samburaj Das

Samburaj is the contributing editor at Hacked and keeps tabs on science, technology and cyber security.


LATEST POSTS

Total Coverage 22nd August, 2017

ChronoPay Looks to Kickstart Bitcoin Adoption in Russia 29th May, 2017

Cybersecurity

New York Bill Would Mandate Backdoors into Smartphones

Posted on .
This article was posted on Thursday, 04:05, UTC.

A new bill up for consideration in the New York state assembly would mandate smartphone manufacturers to decrypt their phones for law enforcement to install backdoors and gain access to smartphones on demand.

// -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace. Don't have an account? Send Jonas Borchgrevink an email -- //

The bill, introduced by Assemblyman Matt Titone in summer 2015 was referred to the committee last week, also proposes a $2,500 fine for each device that flouts the requirement, as revealed by On The Wire.

The primary requirement of the bill is:

…any smartphone manufactured on or after January 1, 2016, and sold or leased in New York, shall be capable of being decrypted and unlocked by its manufacturer or its operating system provider.

Encryption has long been a hot topic of debate between policymakers and tech companies. Silicon Valley is refusing to budge, noting that any move to weaken device encryption and security for law enforcement is a vulnerability in itself, with a backdoor now available for malicious hackers and attackers.

// -- Become a yearly Platinum Member and save 69 USD and get access to our secret group on Workplace. Click here to change your current membership -- //

As things stand, all new iPhones and some Android phones are encrypted by default.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. weighed into the debate recently. He claimed iPhones are the first consumer products in American history to go beyond the reach of lawful warrants. He called for a “national, legislative solution,” stating that Apple’s unwillingness to give in to backdoors.

The note included in the bill explains the reasoning for this sweeping measure and the fine proposed for every device that doesn’t comply with the requirement.

 The safety of the citizenry calls for a legislative solution, and a solution is easily at hand. Enacting this bill would penalize those who would sell smart- phones that are beyond the reach of law enforcement.

The fact is that, although the new software may enhance privacy for some users, it severely hampers law enforcement’s ability to aid victims. All of the evidence contained in smartphones and similar devices will be lost to law enforcement, so long as the criminals take the precaution of protecting their devices with passcodes. Of course, they will do so. Simply stated, passcode-protected devices render lawful court orders meaningless and encourage criminals to act with impunity.

In statements that may come as a surprise to many, the former director of the NSA, Michael Hayden spoke against backdoors and voiced his disagreement with FBI’s plan to put an end to or limit encryption.

Speaking at a recent cybersecurity conference in Miami beach where the former director claimed the NSA are the best hackers in the world, he stated:

I actually think end-to-end encryption is good for America. I know encryption represents a particular challenge for the FBI. But on balance, I actually think it creates greater security for the American nation than the alternative: a backdoor.

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest money you can't afford to lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here.



Feedback or Requests?

Samburaj Das

Samburaj Das

Samburaj is the contributing editor at Hacked and keeps tabs on science, technology and cyber security.

Comments
  • user

    AUTHOR MickGhee

    Posted on 9:17 am January 14, 2016.

    dont worry folks there will be a custom rom which fools the network into thinking the phone is compliant. there is nothing they can do that we cant undo. Well on Android anyway. Just another reason to ditch your Iphone and join the openspource revolution

    • user

      AUTHOR Illutian Kade

      Posted on 2:17 pm January 15, 2016.

      Or….we could just revolt and throw the scum out.

      It’s easy to make a hardware backdoor, just as it is to make a software one.

      • user

        AUTHOR MickGhee

        Posted on 8:35 pm January 15, 2016.

        much easier to hack it than revolt but i like where you are going … lock n load patriot

  • user

    AUTHOR Real Anti-Racist Action

    Posted on 9:52 am January 14, 2016.

    This is the worst dictatorship in History. Worse then Asian-Genghis Khan, who genocided 127,000,000 million indigenous Russian and European tribal peoples.
    Worse then the Moors who genocided some 9,000,000 indigenous Spanish tribal peoples.
    Worse then the Holodomor which genocided 45,000,000 indigenous tribal peoples of Ukraine and Russia.
    What is wrong with these lunatics.
    No freedoms here. I check with the Federal government everyday just to receive permission to breath. They always reluctantly grant me this permission each and everyday. I fear for when they deny me the right to breath, for i must let out to much Carbon i am sure..

  • user

    AUTHOR Dan Gul

    Posted on 3:55 pm February 4, 2016.

    All that will do is open up better ways to root the phones. Considering most of the people in power a technical troglodytes, they miss the easy win this is for hackers. Since the law specifically requires MANUFACTURERS and Phone operators to do this, if the encryption is not theirs, there is nothing they can do legally. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=csh.cryptonite Part of this is the danger however of being under contract with a phone carrier who can pass the legal issues to the customer. This action will make the demand for off contract phones higher and drive prices lower (or higher) in NY if this idiotic law passes. I am skeptical that this law will pass though. Too many consumer protections violated. The word really needs to get out there to NYers to be aware of this.

  • View Comments (5) ...
    Navigation
    The team:
    Dmitriy Lavrov
    Analyst
    Dmitriy Lavrov is a professional trader, technical analyst and money manager with 10 years of trading experience. He covers Forex, Commodities and Cryptocurrencies. He is among the top 10 most Read More
    Jonas Borchgrevink
    Founder
    Jonas Borchgrevink is the founder of Hacked.com and CryptoCoinsNews.com. He is a serial entrepreneur, trader and investor. He shares his own personal journey on Hacked.com. // -- Discuss and ask Read More
    Mate Csar
    Analyst
    Trader and financial analyst, with 10 years of experience in the field. An expert in technical analysis and risk management, but also an avid practitioner of value investment and passive Read More
    Mati Greenspan
    Analyst
    Senior Market Analyst at Etoro.com. // -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace. Don't have an account? Send Jonas Borchgrevink an email -- // Important: Never invest Read More
    Rakesh Upadhyay
    Analyst
    Rakesh Upadhyay is a Technical Analyst and Portfolio Consultant for The Summit Group. He has more than a decade of experience as a private trader. His philosophy is to use Read More
    Pamela Meropiali
    Account Manager
    Pamela Meropiali is responsible for users on Hacked.com. // -- Discuss and ask questions in our community on Workplace. Don't have an account? Send Jonas Borchgrevink an email -- // Read More
    Joseph Young
    Journalist
    Joseph Young is a finance and tech journalist & analyst based in Hong Kong. He has worked with leading media and news agencies in the technology and finance industries, offering Read More
    While stories appear every day regarding the vulnerabilities of smart…