As soon as we hear “business platform,” we think Aragon. How can you improve on Aragon? Well, Ties is a bit different. Ties offers a social networking aspect that Aragon doesn’t achieve. While Aragon offers an easy introduction to smart contracts, Ties wants to build a network around such smart contracts, and promote the start of new businesses in the process. Billing itself as a decentralized “LinkedIn” of cryptocurrency, Ties certainly is interesting.
Ties.Network satisfies the need of crypto-community to connect and the need to secure P2P business transactions in a new counter- economy. Today the community is fragmented and connections are fragile for two reasons. It’s still a new market (though it’s growing rapidly), and because it is so new, it is hard to find professionals one can immediately trust and strike a deal with. Ties.Network aims at resolving the issue of trust for crypto-community on a fundamental level by giving people opportunities to find each other and do business in a new, yet safe environment in accordance with the principles of decentralized economy.
On the surface, it seems that Ties can do most of what Aragon offers, including the crowdfunding aspect, but also offers a social network and rating aspect. The rating part appears important to the idea’s creators, in that they are limiting those who can actually offer feedback on a person or entity to those who’ve done business with such on the same platform. This is good in one respect but bad in another. Those who’ve already established themselves in the industries at hand will have to re-establish themselves on a new platform, competing perhaps with those who’ve not yet previously established themselves at all. This is problematic for obvious reasons, but not a major drawback.
As an IT product, Ties.Network is based on Ties.DB – a public, decentralized, and distributed noSQL database that allows to store huge amounts of dynamic data, and search within the content of the files. Ties.DB is a public, open-source solution that can be utilized by other dApps and decentralized blockchain-related projects to facilitate their entering the market and structure large amounts of data.
We like the sounds of Ties. In fact, from the outset, we don’t see a reason that it and Aragon necessarily have to compete for market share. There are two different types of groups being served here – in the case of Aragon, businesses themselves, whereas in Ties, we see that both the businesses themselves and the people operating within them are being served. In the case of Ties also, we see a forced usage of the token, similar to the Aragon Network token, and this is an encouraging sign for the health and long-term value of such a token. Once you’ve established that there are certain things that can only be achieved with a certain token, all that remains to do is to make that thing both valuable and in demand. That is the actual task of most of the firms we review here, and no less the task of Ties.Network. What have they actually to offer, then, in specifics?
Ties list their “key abilities” as the following:
● Trade goods and services
● Trade cryptocurrencies
● Hire and recruit specialists
● Participate in token generation events and blockchain projects
● Receive feedback for startups or token generation events
● Promote token generation events and network with startups
The overwhelming focus on tokens and the creation thereof is disheartening. Someone has to say it, so it may as well be the author: the token craze is not going to last forever. Building businesses around it, at least those which make it easier to do, seems not just low-profit but also ill-fated. While tokenization will increasingly be the mode of the future, and platforms will be required to facilitate it, we don’t see these as good investments at this time. Such platforms are best left to rise of their own volition than be funded on the model they seek to service. This would be preferable for them, as well, to not need a token model to fund on, but just get in the business of helping people create tokens, the way that KICKICO did. Nevertheless, we have to say, that without this particular “token generation and promotion” aspect of Ties, we’re not actually offered that much.
To the end of the token generation events, we get a bit more detail:
A project on Ties.Network is an instrument for users’ collaboration within a certain industry allowing users to discuss/share their ideas, make P2P financial transactions between the project team members and collect finance from other users of the platform.
So far, we’re not overly convinced that this platform is solving real problems in real industries. We tend to think that Aragon could solve the actual crowdfunding issues, and that there are other means by which tokens can be issued than through this platform. It does not, probably, offer enough novelty to break ground long-term. Nevertheless, it could be a good entry point for some legacy businesses into the crypto space, and as such, its token is likely to hold some value, under certain provisions, and we will keep this in mind moving forward.
As to payments and settlements, we get:
Payment is transferred to a smart contract escrow, which is only released when the results of the transaction are accepted by all parties involved. When and only if necessary, Ties.Network arbitrators would intervene to resolve disputes […].
It’s almost funny to read the Ties explanation of its fee structure. Instead of taking fees, they levy taxes! Which are totally different things, right? In any case, it’s good to know there is some revenue model. We’ll talk about that a bit more in the token section.
As to the storage and relay of data, a decentralized network of nodes will perform this function, with faster nodes achieving a higher reward.
Ties Token (TIE)
Ties will derive revenue from advertising on the platform, a tax imposed on escrows held on the platform, and profits from currency exchanging.
The token is required to transact in the platform, which is crucial for its value long-term. The analysis then becomes whether or not the Ties platform is one that is going to do enough business to make the token in-demand enough to justify an investment, as well as whether or not the supply will make this a mistake even then. A high supply can mean that coins issue during the generation event wind up on discount at the exchanges – this is just the nature of things.
Fortunately, Ties are issuing 140,000,000 tokens, which is an amount that we can foresee holding some value. Earlier buyers will receive up to a 20% bonus of tokens, but we’ll discuss more about that in the investment details section.
We think the fundamentals are met with Ties, but we’re still not sure that this will necessarily perform enough outside of Aragon that both will truly co-exist. This shouldn’t detract from investments in the short-term, nevertheless, as it’s something that takes time to prove out, and in the interim there is definitely enough money and room for both.
According to his own description, CEO Alexander Neymark:
[…] has a significant experience in launching and developing innovative financial services in banks and telecommunications companies (starting from 2000).
A search of his name and blockchain yields this profile in a Dutch blockchain group, in which he writes:
The problem lays in the fact that if the system is distributed, then anyone can supply the server. A random person can have direct access to the entire database and can either conduct DOS attacks on it by placing a heap of garbage data, or delete everything. The the technical question raised here is: How do we avoid this? In centralized servers, such as facebook’s, the issue is simply addressed by deciding on what is valid and what is not, which makes it act like a top-down entity. In the case of a decentralized system, there is no such trust center. That is, we need to establish the general consensus rules of the game for everyone. It impossible to store such a database directly in the Blockchain. […]
The above is, of course, what Ties aims to do in a nutshell as far as its data storage abilities go.
Software lead Anton Filatov previously worked as a Java developer for a payments-based firm called PayStore.com. His work has mostly been in Java, but this should not detract from his ability to work in Ethereum projects.
We think Ties.Network, like Aragon, will have a long future, but we’re not sure how it will stack up against Aragon and other plays which want to help companies get onto the blockchain.
- We think there is a myopic tendency to exaggerate the usefulness of tokens or the blockchain, and it represents itself in this project’s focus on tokenization for projects they want to bring on board. -2
- Could be competing for a small market. -0.5
- Coming into the ICO boom late. -0.5
- We think that companies are only going to increasingly get on the blockchain, and platforms like Ties will be one way in which they do it. That they have built a few tertiary services to help give the token some value is also a plus. +3
- The project is well-designed, if limited in scope. This isn’t always a bad thing. +2
- We think that the team are philosophically inclined in the right direction to whether the upcoming store that will befall the global cryptocurrency market, inevitably. We think they’ll still be able to develop the project through bad times. +2
- For a short-term play, there will certainly be a lot of interest in Ties around its ICO and directly after. We think that there are definite opportunities for profit via the bonus structure. +1
We arrive at a 5.0 for Ties.Network. As you can see, our reasoning is that while in the short-term there are profits to be made, long-term we think there is some proving left to be done as to the viability of a business model geared toward ICOs.
140,000,000 tokens will be issued, and the beginning rate is 24 cents each, at which price you will apparently get a 20% bonus. The bonuses then decrease as tokens are sold. When 10% have sold, the bonus is reduced to 17%, and so on, as shown below:
We recommend taking only official information, and being wary of anything unexpected. The scammers don’t need any help, they’re getting rich enough off the legitimate intentions of investors as it stands. So, get your information as to investment from https://ties.network/TGE-details and nowhere else. The sale begins in a couple weeks. A Google alert for “Ties network scam” is advisable, in case something happens you should be aware of.
ICO Analysis: The Game Machine
In recent years passionate gamers have been exploited by huge game development companies that hold a monopoly over the industry. The recent EA Star Wars Battlefront catastrophe brought a lot of attention to an issue that gamers are all too familiar with.
Gamers have to dig deeper and deeper into their pockets to pay for the expansion packs, DLC, and additional features that are excluded from the main game. And these games aren’t cheap.
It’s increasingly becoming apparent that there are fundamental issues with how the gaming industry works today. Fortunately for gamers, the blockchain is already beginning to form a new paradigm in the way games are funded, developed and purchased.
The Game Machine is an open source platform that seeks to decentralize the gaming industry. It aims to provide sleek software that will empower gamers and game developers alike.
How are they planning on doing this?
The platform has four foundational layers that are stepping stones for this innovative new project. The first layer is the game machine client. It will work as a wallet to store and send Gamefuel tokens and will come with a built in mining interface so that all users can participate in securing the Game Machine’s blockchain.
The second step is to develop their “Rise Machine” that will allow members of the Game Machine community to invest funds into games they see promise in – funds that go directly to the developers so they can create their game independent of the EAs and other oligarchies.
This is perhaps the most powerful innovation suggested by the platform. It gives everyone from the small game studios, with a only a few developers, to the prominent developer, who wants to deviate from the script, the chance to create and sell great games to the community at a fair price when they otherwise could not.
The third layer of the platform is the “Ads Machine” a decentralized advertising market that will live inside the Game Machine client so that game publishers or advertisers can market their products to a gamer specific demographic. Advertisers have been experimenting for years with in-game, native advertising, and it’s a powerful use case for the game machine, just as a stand alone feature. Expect this element of their platform to bring in huge revenue if they can build up their user base.
The last layer of development in their platform is the “Exchange Machine”. This will simplify the process of buying and selling tokens for gamers who use or hold multiple ingame currencies. This way, gamers can sell their Gamefuel and easily move a variety of coins in and out of the game machine.
The Game Machine team is using an Erc20 token called GMIT, which stands for Game Machine Initial Token. Each token is currently valued at 2,500 GMIT per ETH, or $0.32 USD. The token will be tradeable for actual Gamefuel at a ratio where 1 Gamefuel= 0.5 GMIT. Thiswill occur once the platform officially launches in May or June of next year.
The GMIT token is issued by Game Machine OÜ, incorporated in Estonia. A total of 140 million tokens will be created during the various stages of the token sale. The pre-sale has already been conducted and an equivalent of 751 Ethereum were invested, which means roughly 1,870,000 GMIT have already been bought. There are bonuses for early investors during the crowdsale where day 1=+15%, day 2=+10% and day3 =+5%.
There is also another coin that can be mined called GMC or Game Machine Client token, which will be exchangeable for GMIT tokens before the official platform launch at a ratio where 1 GMC = 0.0002 GMIT. The GMC token is given to miners who are being rewarded for securing the network during the Game Machine’s beta testing stage so they can earn Gamefuel. The official Gamefuel token will have its own blockchain that runs on two key components, Limited Proof of Work, and Proof of Authority. Limited proof of work is an energy friendly implementation of the traditional proof of work protocol that bitcoin uses.
Proof of Authority is used to enable faster confirmations of crowdfunding transactions where the authority level of a user confirming transactions is determined through analyzing metrics such as time of use, the amount of purchases and sales of games on the platform made and how positive or negative the feedback of other users were about their contributions to the platform. This can also include how long they have been mining for and how fast. One can imagine this is useful for fending off bad actors that might just try to crowdsource Gamefuel and then commit an exit scam without contributing anything. This blockchain is inspired by the Scorex 2 framework devised by the Scorex foundation, which was also implemented by the Waves decentralized exchange platform.
The three co-founders of Game Machine have over 17 years of combined experience in project development, IT consulting, video game marketing and development.
The entire team consists of 19 full time employees who are busy working on many different parts of the Game Machine platform. If that’s not impressive enough then look at the history of two of the co-founders Taras Dogval and Alexandr Isaev who were both previous board members of Hakk, which is an interactive agency that has done marketing for huge European companies such as Volvo, Tallink Silja Line and Neste. The other co-founder Maria Suvorina has six years of experience in marketing and promoting games on computers and phones. She’s worked for companies such as Suricate Games, TMA and AminiLab.
Although these companies aren’t that well known, most of their work is out of the public’s eye, and they have actually made contributions to famous games. Aminilab for example has participated in development for games such as Alone in the Dark, FIFA, Dragon Age, Mass Effect, Doodle God and Doodle Devil.
The Game Machine is an extremely ambitious project that, if successful, will truly revolutionize the industry. The team behind the platform is experienced, has a great track record and is big enough to polish and refine the Game Machine into a fantastic platform for gamers and developers. However, the existing industry players already have huge advantages when it comes to funding, marketing, development and most importantly building a big reputation and brand awareness. It’s difficult to predict if a community driven effort from gamers and developers combined on an open source platform, will be enough to break into the existing market and convince everyday gamers to switch to an entirely new platform.
- One risk for this project is the quality of its design in terms of how friendly the user interface will be. If the platform is too difficult for technically illiterate people to use then it will not have wheels to get going anywhere. -1
- Another threat to the game machine is the plethora of other competitors that are already working on blockchain innovations in the gaming industry. For example, Enjincoin is an existing game development company founded in 2009 that recently completed its ICO, raising $20 million to kick start a platform that boasts features very similar to the ones offered on Game Machine. -2
- Besides the long list of other game-based ICOs that have been launched this year, there is also stiff competition from massive conventional gaming markets. In addition, newer platforms such as Steam have already attractive hundreds of millions of users. -2.5
- The Game Machine has a lot of potential for quickly stacking up a big user base, and one reason is due to the strong alignment of incentives between gamers and game creators. The traditional game development giants on the other hand are ignoring what their consumers and even some of their own developers have had to say about how games should be created, distributed or sold. Instead of focusing on quality and a fair deal for customers, these development companies have opted to lined their pockets instead. This is why gamers and developers would flock to the Game Machine overnight if the platform works well. +3
- The project’s potential for increasing the value of the underlying gamefuel token is actually quite immense in scope. Just the crowdsourcing and kickstarting mechanism built into the platform would induce a scenario where a large sum of people would continually purchase gamefuel tokens to lock into smart contracts. Once enough gamers are participating in this process the money locked in gamefuel tokens at any given time will only rise, thus reducing the supply of tokens in circulation and consequently increasing gamefuel’s value.+3
- With the plans to integrate a digital advertising market directly into the platform, gamefuel has a secondary source of revenue because advertising slots on the game machine platform can only be purchased with gamefuel.+3
- The “Exchange machine” that’s built into the Game Machine client is a nice approach to sourcing liquidity that will allow many other game based cryptocurrency holders to sell their tokens to purchase gamefuel. Attracting a wide range of gamers who are interested in different blockchain based gaming platforms is a unique approach to marketing that many readers may not have considered as a form of advertising. +2
The Game Machine is a solid project overall; the team is large, has experience and will have raised additional funds to expand their efforts once their crowdsale is completed. That being said, stiff competition from new and existing gaming avenues, not to mention luring a dedicated gaming community to an entirely new platform. These risks must be weighed carefully before entering into Game Machine. As such, this ICO has been granted a score of 5.5 out of 10.
Unfortunately, the presale period of the Game Machine ended a few days ago; however, the final crowdsale period will open for everyone to participate from Dec. 14 through Jan. 31, 2018..
There will only ever be 140 million gamefuel tokens created in the ICO, and 70% of them will be available for token sale participants. The rest of the tokens will be divided into portions and used to fund various parts of the project:
- 14.2% token storage for starting in-game items withdrawals.
- 1.4% for bounty program.
- 1.4% for advisors.
- 4.5% for referral program.
- 7.1% for team.
The team’s portion of tokens is utilized to pay for development and split in the following arrangement below.
- 10% Legal maintenance.
- 5% Operating expenses.
- 35% Marketing and PR.
- 50% Development of a product.
You can learn more about their token and ICO here.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.
ICO Analysis: Gimmer Token
The impeccable rise of algorithmic trading has ushered in a new wave of do-it-yourself (DIY) algorithmic trading bots. With the success of these DIY bots in traditional financial markets, it was only a matter of time until they entered the cryptocurrency market.
For algorithmic trading, volatility creates opportunity sets. And with cryptocurrencies still trading in an inefficient market, volatility runs rampant. This level of volatility creates an ideal environment for even the most rudimentary algorithmic trading strategies. However, there is a lack of DIY automated trading bots that are available for use by amatuer cryptocurrency traders. With this in mind, Gimmer is looking to take advantage of this need.
According to the company’s website, “Gimmer offers easy-to-use advanced algorithmic trading bots that require no programming skills, no previous trading experience and no in-depth knowledge of cryptocurrencies.”
Essentially, Gimmer is hoping to position itself as the leading DIY algorithmic trading bots for individual cryptocurrency traders. While the company may never be the “Quantopian” of the cryptocurrency space, Gimmer does provide a novel solution for amateur traders.
The Gimmer token (GMR) will be implemented using the Ethereum ERC20. While GMR tokens will be visible in participants’ ERC20 wallet, the tokens will not be tradable until the close of the public sale on January 31, 2018. GMR tokens will issued starting from January 3, 2018. GMR holders generate value from the token as a form of payment for the rental cost of Gimmer’s trading bots. For users, the rental cost scales proportionately to the level of sophistication desired – more sophistication equals higher return (at least in theory).
According to the whitepaper, 45% of the funds raised will go towards development and operations, 35% towards marketing and acquisition, 15% towards the founders and team, with the remainder of the pot (5%) going to legal and compliance.
Gimmer Tokens are valued at 1 Ether (ETH) per 1,000 GMR (plus applicable bonuses). The total amount of tokens to be sold is capped at 100,000,000 GMR. However, an additional 6,000,000 GMR will be created for advisors, reserves, and the team, with another 4,000,000 GMR created for bounties.
The company has not yet stated its intention to list the GMR tokens on any major crypto exchanges.
Gimmer’s core team consists of two senior developers, a global macro hedge fund manager, and a creative design veteran. As compared with the majority of ICOs, Gimmer’s team is in-line with the relative standard – the quality of team meets basic expectations.
The company’s CEO, Philipe Comini, is a senior-level UX/UI designer who is also balancing two other jobs (according to LinkedIn) – typically, not a good sign. The company’s CTO, Persio Flexa, is also a senior developer who recently launched 2 other start-ups – again, not a good sign. The company’s COO, Paul Lindsell, is a creative design veteran with over 12 years experience that is seemingly committed to his role – not balancing multiple jobs. The company’s CIO, Masaichi Hasegawa, is currently a global macro hedge fund manager and an executive of a shoe manufacturing company – the third C-suite executive of Gimmer to balance two other jobs.
The rest of Gimmer’s team consists of a marketing director, a user experience director, two developers, a customer researcher, a commercial director, and a journalist.
Gimmer presents a highly speculative buying opportunity for investors interested in short-term capital appreciation.
Creating profitable algorithmic trading strategies is incredibly difficult. Hedge funds typically employ a large staff of mathematicians, experienced machine learning engineers, data scientists, and the like – Wall Street refers to them as “quants.” Quants typically hold a PhD in finance or quantitative mathematics and have years of hands-on experience with both statistical analysis and engineering (Python and C++). Does Gimmer employ any quants? No, not even by the slightest measure.
Overall, Gimmer’s DIY algorithmic trading bots are likely just a novel tool-kit for amatuer cryptocurrency traders, nothing more, nothing less.
Gimmer provides no data on slippage modeling, meaning users have no idea of all the transaction costs that are associated with a higher frequency of trading (including: fees, commission, and slippage). These costs can be significant and add up quickly. -1
Gimmer’s core team does not seem to be dedicated (balancing multiple jobs) or qualified in any sense. With Gimmer’s team lacking any real trading platform experience, unforeseen issues with their algorithms may lead to sizable losses for users. -1.5
Gimmer provides no data on latency, meaning users do not know if the company’s algorithms are deployed to proximity-based execution servers in attempt to achieve low-latency performance no matter where the user is located. For all trading strategies, latency must be measured and managed in order to maximize the probability of success. -1
Provided that Gimmer’s trading bots run successfully without any technical glitches, users could benefit from enhanced risk management protocols, thereby insuring their principal investment through more downside protection. +2
Copy trading techniques could benefit novice traders, as they can publicly see high level information such as start date, running period, currency pairs and percent gained. Based on the public information, users can copy seemingly successful trading strategies and rent the same bots. +3
Automated trading strategies will allow a larger pool of traders to invest in cryptocurrencies. Since the market is still subject to large, volatile price swings, more passive traders could use Gimmer’s platform to execute automated trades (based on pre-set parameters) without having to monitor the market on a day-to-day basis. +2.5
While algorithmic trading in the cryptocurrency space is a smart strategy, Gimmer lacks the sophistication of even the most basic trading platforms. The biggest concern beyond Gimmer’s lack of sophistication, is the pedigree of the core team. With no quants on staff and a couple UI/UX designers creating the algorithms, technical issues are likely to occur. And with that in mind, faulty algorithms or platform glitches could easily lead to the loss of principal investment for users.
For amateur traders interested in novel tool to play around with, Gimmer is a great choice. For veteran traders with solid programming and statistical skills, move on to a better platform.
Against this backdrop, we believe that a score of 4.0 out of 10 is warranted.
- Type: Crowdsale
- Symbol: GMR
- Pre-ICO Sale: November 24, 2017
- Public Sale: January 3, 2018
- Payments Accepted: ETH
Disclaimer: no position in Gimmer at the time of writing.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.
ICO Analysis: Lendoit
Lendoit is a next-generation peer to peer decentralized lending platform based on Ethereum, which connects lenders and borrowers all over the world using the advantages of smart contracts.
The Lendoit platform provides professional scoring and verification, APIS for each country, a loan marketplace where lenders set rates on loan applications, a default market where failed loans can be traded, syndicated loans, and the ability to sell a loan to another lender if needed. Lendoit will be the only lending platform on the market that does not take collaterals. The company believes that, “in a world of crypto micro-loans, managing collaterals is not sensible.” In their view, this is “like lending USD by using EUR as collateral.”
Because there are no collaterals, the Lendoit platform combines four methods to mitigate the chances of lenders losing money: Smart Compensation Fund, Syndicated Loans, 3rd party scoring/verification from local companies, and a collectors market where debts can be sold.
The following is a simplified guide to Lendoit’s loan process.
- The borrower applies for a loan by filling out an application. This takes about three minutes.
- The borrower uploads any relevant verification (i.e. government-issued photo ID) according to their particular country’s regulations.
- Lendoit sends the loan app and verified information to verified scoring providers to receive a score for the current loan.
- Lendoit will publish each smart loan contract in the blockchain and marketplace.
- Lenders Tender is a process of raising loans for funds requested by the borrower.
- The borrower can now withdraw the funds using his or her wallet.
- When the date to pay back the loan arrives, the borrower receives a notification.
- The borrower now repays the funds with interest to the smart contract.
- The lender withdraws his money in the same currency he loaned it.
- The lender receives interest in the form of LOAN tokens, the amount based on an automatic conversion algorithm put in place by the Smart Conversion Contract.
- The Smart Compensation Fund Contract helps lenders recover a small portion of their money, if the borrower fails to pay. The amount is not confirmed, but it seems like it will be around 20-30%.
- If the borrower fails to pay the interest and the loan becomes defaulted, the smart loan contract is offered to a collectors tender. The collector who wins the tender buys the debt, which minimizes the loss of funds for the lenders.
Lendoit has an alpha version of its platform available here. It is not very impressive yet. The real technology (smart contracts) has yet to be created.
They plan to release the beta in Q1 of 2018, and the fully operational version Q3 of 2018.
- Symbol: LOAN
- Platform: Ethereum
- Presale: Dec. 13 – December 27, 2017 (125 million for sale. 1 ETH = 13,000 LOAN). Must register for whitelist in order to contribute.
- Token sale: Jan. 18 – Feb. 18, 2018 (475 million for sale. sale starts at 1 ETH = 12,000 LOAN)
- Total Supply: 1 billion
- Hard Cap: 50,000 Eth (currently $22 million USD)
The LOAN token plays several roles. Here are a few of the most important:
- Lenders can use any ERC20 currency to loan, but must hold 10% of whatever amount they loan in LOAN tokens. For example, a lender wants to loan someone $1,000 ETH must hold $100 worth of LOAN in his account.
- Borrower must use LOAN to publish the Smart Loan Contract.
- All the fees charged on the platform are paid in LOANs.
- All the interest payments will be paid to the lenders in LOANs. This will take place automatically via the Smart Conversion Contract.
The company is located in Israel but incorporated in Gibraltar. The company maintains a large global team that extends far beyond its in-house operation. However, after researching the four co-founders of the company, nothing particularly striking stands out. One would have expected a more impressive track record for those launching a platform of this magnitude.
Seven advisers are signed on to the project, including Richard Titus and Michael Terpin. They also have eight developers, which is fantastic, as it shows they really are trying.
The team picture (above) leaves a lot to be desired, as it is not very professional.
This project has great long-term potential. Its biggest challenge is going to be whether or not it can successfully build the various forms of smart contracts it proposes to launch. There are no known smart contracts in existence that can do what Lendoit promises its contracts will be able to do.
- The concept of not needing collateral to receive loans could be a disaster. Why would lenders want to use this platform when the possibility of getting stiffed is so high? They can just use one of Lendoit’s competitors to guarantee their returns. -2
- The project faces legal hurdles galore. Sure, the plan is to be decentralized, which could reduce certain regulations, but the company is going to be verifying borrowers’ identities in great detail. I could see governments clamping down on projects such as this one if enough lenders start getting ripped off. -2
- The technology required to run this platform does not exist yet. The demo/alpha provided as an example of is extremely basic. It’s a strong possibility the team fails, and this never gets off the ground. -2
- The company has several partners, including Bloom, Hive, RSK, and Wings. I tried to dig deeper into these partnerships but didn’t find anything substantial. These seem to be decent projects, and LOAN can use each to grow.+2
- Some of these other new lending ICOs have done pretty well so far on the markets. SALT token, for example, is extremely hyped. One of the main differences between SALT and LOAN is that SALT requires borrowers to put up collateral, while LOAN does not. One would think this would bring more borrowers to the platform +2
- If they do what they claim to be able to do – build these genius smart contracts – they can change the lending game permanently. In this way, the sky is the limit. +4
- The team has put a great deal of emphasis on development, as evidenced by the number of developers they have on board. +2
As previously stated, the most important aspect of this project is the technology. Can they build these contracts? According to the roadmap, we won’t see the beta version for two or three months, and we won’t be able to judge if the contracts are fully functional for at least six months. This has long-term potential, but a rocky short-term. Against this backdrop, we assign a score of 4 out of 10.
Learn more/sign up for whitelist here.
Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock
- Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin
- Cryptocurrency Analysis: Ripple Continues Rampage...
- Technical Analysis: Volatility on the Rise Again...
- Trade Recommendation: XMR/BTC Pair Throwback
- Trade Recommendation: FCT/BTC Bullish Reversal
- Asian Market Update – Thursday: Ethereum Extends R...
- Crypto Market Reaches Historic Milestone as Ether...
- Cryptocurrency Analysis: Ripple Continues Rampage as Litecoin and Ethereum Enter Correction December 14, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: XMR/BTC Pair Throwback December 14, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: FCT/BTC Bullish Reversal December 14, 2017
- Can a New Generation of Regulated Token Sales Save ICOs? December 14, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: NZDJPY December 14, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin December 14, 2017
- Asian Market Update – Thursday: Ethereum Extends Rally; Asian Stocks down After US Rates Hike December 14, 2017
- Daily Analysis: Dollar Falls, Gold Jumps after Yellen’s Final Move December 14, 2017
- Crypto Market Reaches Historic Milestone as Ether, Ripple Surge December 14, 2017
- Technical Analysis: Volatility on the Rise Again, as Ripple and Ethereum Hit Targets December 13, 2017
A part of CCN
Analysis5 days ago
Long-Term Cryptocurrency Analysis: Look Out Below?
Recommendations7 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Litecoin
Cryptocurrencies5 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Zcash
Cryptocurrencies3 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Bitcoin Cash
Cryptocurrencies6 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Stellar
Cryptocurrencies6 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Ethereum Classic
Analysis3 days ago
Technical Analysis: Litecoin Continues Surge as Bitcoin Tests Highs
Cryptocurrencies1 week ago
Trade Recommendation: Neo