Connect with us

Altcoins

Encrypgen (DNA) Surges Higher On Gene-Chain Launch

Published

on

This year has been an incredibly difficult one for crypto traders.  Trading losses continue to mount, and crypto companies continue to overpromise and underdeliver.  While that might have scared away many traders, it has created an opportunity for those of us that remain.  Encrypgen (DNA) is a utility token that has not disappointed.  The company has continued to meet its roadmap deadlines.  During the summer, Encrypgen released the beta version of its Gene-Chain.  And yesterday, the company made history by launching the world’s first blockchain genomic data marketplace.

Encrypgen DNA Token Surging

As shown in the chart below, the price of DNA is surging by more than 8% since the launch of the Gene-Chain.  Additionally, the price increase is coming with significantly higher than normal volume.

Although CMC shows the price at $0.0504, it’s significantly higher on Cryptopia and KuCoin which offer a DNA/BTC trading pair.  It’s currently trading at $0.054 on both of those exchanges.  It’s unclear how high the coin will trade over the next several days, but the coin did trade above $0.08 after the Gene-Chain beta launch in August.  Given that this is even bigger news, I wouldn’t be surprised to see DNA trade at that level again.

What is the Gene-Chain?

This marketplace (Gene-Chain) will bring together buyers and sellers to facilitate the exchange of genomic data.  The sellers will be consumers, like you and me, that are looking to make some additional income in exchange for selling genomic data.  And the buyers will be primarily researchers and scientists.  Encrypgen has implemented a “buy now” option that will allow buyers to convert BTC and ETH instantly into DNA tokens.  These DNA tokens can then be used to purchase the data from the sellers.

So how will all this this impact the price of the token?  Encrypgen has a supply of roughly 3 million tokens that will be sold to token buyers on the Gene-Chain.  As the supply decreases, the company can go to the exchanges and accumulate more to bring the supply back up to 3 million.  These market orders placed by the company should certainly drive the price higher.  In addition, researchers have the option to buy directly from the exchanges.  This will dramatically increase DNA’s current volume and the token price will likely soar.  Given that the price of the token surged right after the launch yesterday, it’s entirely possible that researchers are currently buying DNA.

Future News

Data sets will be an important part of the puzzle for Encrypgen.  The token will become significantly more valuable as more data sets are uploaded to the Gene-Chain.  I know the company has set a preliminary goal of having 5,000 data sets.  If that happens, the token will likely be trading north of $1.00.

Encrypgen’s marketing team is currently running a campaign to try and find consumers who are interested in selling their genomic data.  Additionally, the company is pursuing strategic partnerships that could make it easier to find data sellers and, consequently, more data sets.  Crypto traders should stay tuned as I fully expect partnership news to trickle in over the next several months.

Conclusion

I’ve written about Encrypgen before as it’s one of the few crypto companies that appears to be meeting all its deadlines and achieving its goals.  After being burned a few times in the past, I prefer to stick with honest, hard-working, dedicated companies that know exactly what’s needed to succeed.  Encrypgen continues to impress me and the future looks extremely bright.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.8 stars on average, based on 21 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Altcoins

Lisk (LSK) Pushing for Momentum as Marketing Chief Responds to Over-Hyped Claims

Published

on

Lisk (LSK) trailed on the edges of Tuesday’s altcoin surge which saw more than a dozen alts increase by between 7% and 40% in value.

One day previously, the project’s head of marketing, Thomas Schouten, took to Reddit to respond to the recent assessment by William Mougayar that Lisk was among multiple blockchain projects which he regarded as ‘over-marketed’.

Mougayar is a venture investor and advisor, and author of The Business Blockchain, which boasts a foreword by Vitalik Buterin. Shouten’s regard for Mougayar’s opinion was such that he felt compelled to respond to the criticism.

Is Lisk Over-Marketed?

As you can see from Mougayar’s graphic, Lisk joins the likes of EOS, Tron and XRP (here referred to as Ripple) in the over-marketed category. Mougayar stated:

“I’ve classified some projects in 3 buckets: Right, Under & Over Marketed. It is based on their own or community-driven activity. I understand some will push back, but this is how I view the market today.”

The tweet followed the author’s post from the previous day titled ‘Marketing Strategies and Practices for Blockchain Projects and Startups’. The post makes a nifty read for those interested in the marketing side of blockchain; why more money doesn’t always breed more success (he’s looking at you, EOS); and the difference between branding and visual identity.

“Over-marketed means the claims are ahead of delivery or being hyped. Under-marketed means the potential of the product is not well messaged into the market.”

Many of the tweet’s 130 comments came from disgruntled coin holders intent on defending their respective projects – in response to which Mougayar added:

“…the classification has nothing to do with the products/services of these companies… I didn’t include all blockchain projects, but selected ones that I was familiar with and that were significant enough to use as a representative sample.”

Lisk Head of Marketing Responds

The response by Lisk’s Thomas Schouten was less hostile than you might expect. He conceded that Lisk had indeed been over-marketed to an extent:

“William’s definition of over-marketed is “claims are ahead of delivery or being hyped”. To a certain degree, I agree with his judgement… I feel that too often our team has predicted progress that could not be delivered in the end. We have learned from this the hard way.”

However, Schouten also pointed out that many of the so-called ‘right-marketed’ projects happened to be exchanges, while most ‘over-marketed’ projects happened to be platforms.

“Coincidence? No. To me, comparing an exchange (for-profit) with a working product and profitable business model, to open-source blockchain platforms in development (non-profit) is comparing apples with pears.”

Lisk Price

While LSK did record 3.3% gains against the dollar, and over 4.4% against BTC on Tuesday, momentum was hard to come by. LSK/BTC on Binance moved from $0.0003368 up to $0.0003518, while the dollar valuation rose from $1.19 to $1.23.

The daily trade volume of $3.6 million was a $400,000 increase from the previous day – not insignificant, but nowhere near the trade influx seen by some of the day’s major movers.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.5 stars on average, based on 125 rated postsGreg Thomson is a full-time crypto writer and digital nomad. He eats ICOs for breakfast and bleeds altcoins. Wherever he lays his public key is his home.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Altcoins

What Joe Rogan and His Billions of Viewers Have Learned About Bitcoin, Crypto and Blockchain

Published

on

Podcast powerhouse Joe Rogan has been dipping his toes into cryptocurrency ever more frequently since Andreas Antonopoulos made his first of four appearances to date on the show back in early 2014.

In the intervening years, a potential billion monthly listeners have frequently been exposed to informative, educational, and sometimes controversial, cryptocurrency conversations on the podcast platform. These have been conducted by blockchain evangelists (Dr. Ben Goertzel) as well as hardcore skeptics (Peter Schiff), and have explored a plethora of crypto and blockchain’s potential uses.

So, amid the cacophony of opposing thought and opinion the largest media platform in the world has exposed its viewers to, just what will the JRE viewers have taken away from the podcast’s crypto-centric episodes?

The Good

Crypto fundamentalists would have been more thrilled with Anton Antonopoulos’ appearances on the show than blockchain fanatics. Antonopoulos makes no secret of his desire to see crypto shake up the existing global financial paradigm, and Rogan’s somewhat lefty/hippy nature assured he received these ideas enthusiastically.

“All you creeps that are controlling money all throughout the world… your time is slowly closing in. Am I right?”

That’s the question with which Joe Rogan opened JRE #844 – Antonopoulos’ fourth appearance on the show. Andreas answered with a simple ‘Yep’, and went on to explain the phenomena which saw the banking industry make a (devious?) move into the blockchain world:

“ (In 2015) The media was constantly bashing Bitcoin. And then… we saw this interesting phenomena where the banks started getting interested…not in Bitcoin, but in blockchain – the technology behind Bitcoin.”

The best side of cryptocurrency – its potential to wrestle financial control from the hands of our global banking overlords – is best displayed during Antonopoulos’ appearances on the show, and are worth a listen for his wonderful analogies alone:

It’s rather amusing. I look at that a bit like the Horse-Buggy Association of America is going: ‘we like this automobile thing you’ve designed, but we have a very big investment in hay and horses, stables and veterinarians, so we’re going to use the technology behind the automobile – the pneumatic tyre – and we’re going to revolutionize horse-buggies.’”

The Bad

Perhaps the worst side of cryptocurrency to be exposed on JRE is its tendency to find itself the target of hackers and thieves. More than once Rogan and guests have brought up some of the ridiculous sums of cryptocurrency stolen in recent years, and the conversations usually end with a hopeful plea that one day ‘they’ll find out how to make it more secure’.

Of course, the vast, vast majority of crypto thefts to date have taken place on exchanges. Holding this up as an example of crypto’s lack of security is like blaming a car for getting stolen, even though you left it out in the middle of the road with the engine running – or worse – placed the keys in the hand of the thief yourself.

The Ugly

The ugly truth which investment broker and financial commentator, Peter Schiff, thought he was unveiling on JRE went something like this: Bitcoin has no value; Bitcoin is doomed; Buy more gold. On JRE #1145, Schiff said:

“Bitcoin is trying to digitally replicate the properties of gold. That’s the whole selling point – they say it’s digital gold. And it does have a lot of gold’s properties which help it succeed as money, but it doesn’t have any of gold’s physical properties that gave it so much value in the first place.”

Schiff also caused a stir back in July 2018 when he placed a $1,000 price prediction on BTC, and ridiculed its ‘fake scarcity’. Despite Schiff’s pessimism, and the furore that his appearances always cause, he has probably added some much needed healthy skepticism to the podcast over the years – even though most here would disagree with him completely.

The Future

With Andreas Antonopoulos slated to re-appear in the coming months – his first appearance in over two years – it will be interesting to get his take on the ICO madness of 2017-2018, the market’s ATH, and its subsequent drop-off since then.

Whether you’re a fan of JRE or not, the podcast might end up playing a bigger part than most in spreading crypto and blockchain awareness around the globe.

Disclaimer: The author owns Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.5 stars on average, based on 125 rated postsGreg Thomson is a full-time crypto writer and digital nomad. He eats ICOs for breakfast and bleeds altcoins. Wherever he lays his public key is his home.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Altcoins

Small-Alt Season: Why They’re Pumping, and One Way to Spot them Before They Do

Published

on

As the slow (but volatile) winter period continues in the crypto market, more than one small-cap altcoin has managed to buck the broader trend in recent weeks.

That pattern continued on Tuesday as a handful of alts grew almost 40% in value over twenty-four hours, including Factom (FCT) and Loopring (LRC). The day previously, the much ridiculed cryptocurrency for the truck racing industry, Buggyra Coin Zero (BCZERO), hit over 200% growth in just a few hours.

But not all pumps are created equal, and the reasons behind their sudden appearance at the turn of the year are many-fold.

Manipulation

According to this recent Twitter poll conducted by Hacked and eToro’s Mati Greenspan, most people believe that Sunday’s market dip was a result of manipulation, as opposed to bots or whales (although, in reality, the crossover between the three must be huge).

If the consensus is that dips are a result of manipulation, then should the same rationale not be applied to pumps? Such a cynical view might make the current swathe of fundamental and technical analyses seem pointless. Yet, both methods of analysis continue to prove useful when trying to anticipate market movers.

Coincidence

Coincidence appears to play an important role in cryptocurrency pumps. Market pumps which coincide with some new tech rollout, exchange listing, or upcoming airdrop serve to convince the market that the current growth might be genuine and long-lasting.

But the inevitable dump which follows one of these pumps often returns the coin in question back to square one. As this happens often enough, one starts to see how crypto fundamental developments are used as a convenient smokescreen for market manipulation. For recent examples look at the lead up to the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) hardfork, or the recent Komodo (KMD) hardfork surge, which saw 94% growth recorded in December, followed by a reversion back to square one by January.

Basics

The many-headed beast that is technical analysis continues to throw up winners and losers, and the recent market plunge has already seen more investors turn to TA as a way to minimize losses.

But there are still ways to anticipate which simmering coin is about to come to the boil without getting too technical. Excluding the ridiculously small-volume tokens, the number of times that a surge is preceded by a steady rise in trade volume stands out as a very reliable marker.

Just yesterday, Factom (FCT) was priced at $6.51, and trading at a volume of $130,000. Over the next two hours that volume doubled, and it continued to double every few hours as the coin price pushed slowly upward. By Tuesday morning FCT was priced at $8.86 – a 36% increase; accompanied by rising volume which hit $2 million – a 1,438% influx.

Another example is yesterday’s strong performer, Tron (TRX), which also grew steadily as trade volume trebled over 48 hours.

Tuesday’s other top performer, Loopring (LRC) saw a more sudden 43% price jump without the slow build up of volume here described. However, take a look at LRC’s past week and you see a coin which has slowly increased its trade volume almost day-on-day – from last Tuesday’s $800,000 up to today’s $25 million – a new seven month high. Almost any point up until this morning would have proved a profitable buy-in point for LRC.

Predictions

Hindsight is known for its crystal clear vision, so let’s put this simple little crackpot theory to the test.

Zilliqa (ZIL) just posted 4% gains as trade volume doubled from $7 million to $14 million on Tuesday morning alone. Daily trades reached as high as $29 million earlier this week, and a look at the monthly chart shows massive volume and price pumps at regular intervals.

At the same time, Steem (STEEM) volume more than doubled on Tuesday morning, from $9 million to $19 million. Despite STEEM’s more than 50% gains already this week, daily volume only continues to rise, and just bypassed a four-month high in the process.

Consider these my two predictions for the coming days.

Disclaimer: The author owns Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
1 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 51 vote, average: 5.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.5 stars on average, based on 125 rated postsGreg Thomson is a full-time crypto writer and digital nomad. He eats ICOs for breakfast and bleeds altcoins. Wherever he lays his public key is his home.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending