Connect with us

Regulation

ECB’s Draghi Says It’s Not His Job to Regulate Cryptocurrency

Published

on

The head of the European Central Bank (ECB) believes his organization does not have jurisdiction to regulate cryptocurrencies, tempering calls for a bigger crackdown on the alternative asset class.

Banning Cryptos Not the ECB’s Job

In an #AskDraghi video series hosted by the ECB, President Mario Draghi said it’s not his responsibility to regulate the digital currency market.

“Many of you posted questions about whether the ECB is going to ban Bitcoins or it’s going to regulate Bitcoins,” Draghi said, as quoted by Reuters. “I have to say it’s not the ECB’s responsibility to do that.”

Unlike fiat currencies, which are backed by central banks, cryptos are not backed by anyone, he added.

Draghi was asked whether he would recommend buying bitcoin, in which he responded that the decision would need to be weighed carefully given the market’s wild fluctuations.

Last week, the head of the Bank for International Settlements Agustin Carstens argued for central banks to do more to rein in cryptocurrencies – a market he described as a “Ponzi scheme.”

Cryptocurrencies will be an important agenda item at next month’s Group of 20 meeting in Buenos Aires. Representatives from France and Germany are said to be working on a new framework for regulating the market. The framework is expected to be tabled at the meeting.

Support for Blockchain Grows

Like other government officials, Draghi praised developments in blockchain technology, which he described as “quite promising.” However, he cautioned that blockchain is not yet safe enough for use by the ECB or any other central bank.

“We’re very interested in this technology but it’s still not secure for central banking and therefore we need to look through it and investigate it more,” he said.

The ECB, like its counterparts in Japan, have been exploring distributed ledger technology to boost financial market infrastructure. The Bank of Canada has also been exploring blockchain to speed up the clearing and settlement of financial securities.

Members of the old guard – governments, banks and other traditional financial institutions – have been quick to embrace blockchain while simultaneously disavowing cryptocurrency. However, many have broaden their scope due to heightened demand from mainstream investors.

Back in December, Goldman Sachs announced it would launch a bitcoin trading desk by the middle of 2018, becoming the first major Wall Street firm to do so.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 53 votes, average: 3.33 out of 53 votes, average: 3.33 out of 53 votes, average: 3.33 out of 53 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5 (3 votes, average: 3.33 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.6 stars on average, based on 546 rated postsSam Bourgi is Chief Editor to Hacked.com, where he specializes in cryptocurrency, economics and the broader financial markets. Sam has nearly eight years of progressive experience as an analyst, writer and financial market commentator where he has contributed to the world's foremost newscasts.




Feedback or Requests?

Regulation

U.S. SEC Postpones VanEck-SolidX Bitcoin ETF Decision, Markets Sell Off

Published

on

If you’re wondering why the cryptocurrency market is suddenly in freefall, look no further than the probability of a bitcoin ETF. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued an announcement that it was delaying its decision on the rule change that would pave the way for the product to be traded on the CBOE until Sept. 30. The VanEck-SolidX bitcoin ETF is the market’s best hope for such a product after a similar application proposed by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss was recently shunned. Traders were hoping for a decision by as soon as Aug. 10.

In response, the bottom fell out in the bitcoin price, sending it from approximately $7,000 to $6,765 in a freefall whose speed was only rivaled by the recent run-up in the bitcoin price from the $5,800 level in anticipation of a potential bitcoin ETF. The silver lining is that Wall Street’s top regulator didn’t put the kibosh on this product, but on the downside is there could be even more delays to come.

Source: CoinMarketCap

The SEC announcement, which surfaced on Tuesday, revealed that the regulator has been flooded with “1,300 comments on the proposed rule change.” But apparently, regulators have more questions, as evidenced by their decision to push back their decision.

“The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change,” according to the SEC statement. The agency identified Sept. 30 as the date by which they will “either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change.”

“Market’s Not Ready”

If you ask cryptocurrency trader Brian Kelly of the firm that bears his name, the securities regulator is likely to choose option three and delay its decision yet again. He said on CNBC this evening that “the market’s not ready” for a bitcoin ETF. Kelly noted that selling in response to this delay “is the wrong way to do crypto investing,” adding “there is more to this story than just an ETF.”

Nonetheless, trading in the cryptocurrency market of late has been fueled by emotions tied to the probability of a bitcoin ETF, with pundits suggesting that the passive investment product could catapult BTC into the 401(k) retirement plans of mainstream America. CryptoCompare Co-Founder Charles Hayter is quoted in MarketWatch as having said: “The ETF decision is going to be the next catalyst for the market. There’s a lot of uncertainty around the decision, but also a lot of hope.”

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 53 votes, average: 4.67 out of 53 votes, average: 4.67 out of 53 votes, average: 4.67 out of 53 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5 (3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.6 stars on average, based on 36 rated postsGerelyn has been covering ICOs and the cryptocurrency market since mid-2017. She's also reported on fintech more broadly in addition to asset management, having previously specialized in institutional investing. She owns some BTC and ETH.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Bitcoin ETF Possible in 18 Months: Former Goldman Sachs Executive

Published

on

Investors awaiting the arrival of a bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) should’t get their hopes up, according to Ali Hassan, a former Goldman Sachs executive currently running a cryptocurrency asset management firm. In Hassan’s view, bitcoin’s ‘holy grail’ is certainly coming, but not before regulators fully dissect its implications on consumer safety.

Bitcoin ETF: Timelines and Expectations

In an interview with Bloomberg Markets, Hassan predicted that a bitcoin ETF will be approved only once regulators are convinced that the asset doesn’t expose investors to unnecessary risk. As the recently rejected Winklevoss ETF application clearly showed, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is not convinced that crypto-backed funds are “uniquely resistant to manipulation.”

“We do think that a product is coming soon,” Hassan told Bloomberg. “Perhaps, in the next 18 months, we’ll see a Bitcoin-only ETF.

Hassan, who runs Crescent Crypto, spoke at length about the potential for bitcoin and other crypto funds to revolutionize asset management strategies. He also said that passive investment strategies in crypto will “actually increase the participation in the market.”

The long-awaited bitcoin ETF has been described as the ‘holy grail’ for its potential to lure passive investors and traditional asset managers to the cryptocurrency market. Hopes for its imminent arrival helped spur a nearly 30% rally in bitcoin’s price last month.

Some analysts believe that a joint proposal submitted in June by VanEck and SolidX has the best chance of gaining regulatory approval. The SEC could rule on the fund as early as Aug. 16, though many believe the process will drag on for several months.

Hassan’s Crescent Crypto fund invests in 20 high-profile digital assets that meet specific requirements tied to market capitalization, liquidity and security.

According to the company’s third-quarter report, cryptocurrencies are broken down into four brackets or “sectors,” including: store of value, platform, value transfer and anonymity. Bitcoin, a “store of value” currency, accounts for nearly 45% of the portfolio. “Platform” Ethereum is second at 19.3%. They arefollowed by Ripple and bitcoin cash (“value transfers”) and EOS (“platform”).

For “anonymity,” the fund includes Monero, Dash and Zcash.

Debate Continues

A debate over bitcoin and crypto-backed securities is being waged within the SEC’s own ranks, underscoring a gradual shift in how regulators approach the subject.

Last week, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce formally dissented to the regulator’s ruling on the Winklevoss ETF. In a lengthy statement published on the SEC website, Peirce said:

“I am concerned that the Commission’s approach undermines investor protection by precluding greater institutionalization of the bitcoin market. More institutional participation would ameliorate many of the Commission’s concerns with the bitcoin market that underlie its disapproval order. More generally, the Commission’s interpretation and application of the statutory standard sends a strong signal that innovation is unwelcome in our markets, a signal that may have effects far beyond the fate of bitcoin ETPs.”

On Thursday, Hacked commented on a transcript that described a “heated debate” on cryptocurrency between SEC Chairman Jay Clayton and an unnamed attorney. According to Eric Werner, an associate director of enforcement with the SEC, Clayton is giving the cryptocurrency debate “the same dedication and thought process” as every other issue he has faced throughout his tenure as agency chief.

Disclaimer: The author owns bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptocurrencies. He holds investment positions in the coins, but does not engage in short-term or day-trading.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock.

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.6 stars on average, based on 546 rated postsSam Bourgi is Chief Editor to Hacked.com, where he specializes in cryptocurrency, economics and the broader financial markets. Sam has nearly eight years of progressive experience as an analyst, writer and financial market commentator where he has contributed to the world's foremost newscasts.




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

Regulation

SEC Chair Got into ‘Heated Debate’ on Cryptocurrency

Published

on

Details of a recent roundtable hosted by the SEC has raised eyebrows after a description of a “heated debate” between SEC chair Jay Clayton and an unknown lawyer was released.

This was seen in a transcript from the roundtable in June and was indicative of the sometimes passionate discussion around cryptocurrencies within the agency.

Specifically, at the start of the June 4 roundtable on conduct standards for investment professionals, SEC official Eric Werner introduced Jay Clayton, who was present at the event.

Werner meanwhile, is the associate director of enforcement for the SEC’s Fort Worth regional office.

In discussing Clayton’s work at the agency, Werner brought up an instance in which he walked into a “heated” discussion between the SEC chairman and an unnamed attorney about cryptocurrency, but he took great pains to clarify and debatably laud Clayton’s commitment to the issue in question.

Werner was quoted as saying:

“In fact, the first time that I met the Chairman, I walked into a heated discussion he was having with an attorney in my office about the legitimacy and viability of cryptocurrencies. I was taken aback, honestly, about how much thought he had given to this space and the issues surrounding that. And what I have learned in the time working with him is that he has given every single issue that he has confronted that same dedication and thought process.”

Clayton’s SEC is one agency among several other U.S. regulatory bodies that are taking a leading role in crafting new regulations for the industry.
The SEC is particularly focused on initial coin offerings (ICOs), as Clayton has remarked publicly on the technology in the past.

This can be traced back to a hearing in February where Clayton stressed the difference between cryptocurrencies and ICO-derived tokens that he viewed as securities.

“I want to go back to separating ICOs and cryptocurrencies. ICOs that are securities offerings, we should regulate them like we regulate securities offerings. End of story,” he said at the time.

Unfortunately, the SEC has as of yet not made clear distinctions between what ICO tokens qualify as a security, and which are not. In fact, the “utility token” moniker itself is under significant scrutiny.

This has made it very difficult for ICO’s to operate without fear in the US. After all, the entire purpose of ICO’s was to set capital free, unencumbered by the requirements of obtaining “accredited investor” status.

“Accredited investor” status, refers to an individual whose net income is $200k/year or more, or $1,000,000 in net assets.

It stems from the condescending notion that only rich people should be allowed to invest in certain investment opportunities because those with less capital don’t have the “education” to make sound investment decisions and thus must be protected from their own supposed ignorance.

Featured image courtesy of Shutterstock. 

Important: Never invest (trade with) money you can't afford to comfortably lose. Always do your own research and due diligence before placing a trade. Read our Terms & Conditions here. Trade recommendations and analysis are written by our analysts which might have different opinions. Read my 6 Golden Steps to Financial Freedom here. Best regards, Jonas Borchgrevink.

Rate this post:

Important for improving the service. Please add a comment in the comment field below explaining what you rated and why you gave it that rate. Failed Trade Recommendations should not be rated as that is considered a failure either way.
0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 50 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5 (0 votes, average: 0.00 out of 5)
You need to be a registered member to rate this.
Loading...

4.8 stars on average, based on 15 rated posts




Feedback or Requests?

Continue Reading

5 of 15 Seats Available

Learn more here.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

A part of CCN

Hacked.com is Neutral and Unbiased

Hacked.com and its team members have pledged to reject any form of advertisement or sponsorships from 3rd parties. We will always be neutral and we strive towards a fully unbiased view on all topics. Whenever an author has a conflicting interest, that should be clearly stated in the post itself with a disclaimer. If you suspect that one of our team members are biased, please notify me immediately at jonas.borchgrevink(at)hacked.com.

Trending