Following Tim Cook’s all-encompassing open letter that revealed the US Government’s request to create a backdoor for an iPhone, Apple has released a new FAQ that answers questions that followed the original open letter. Once again, Apple has reiterated its stance on being for encryption as well as dispelling doubts and concerns on its determined position on that very stance.
It’s among the biggest stories of 2016. Apple’s ongoing legal battle with the FBI has the world watching and paying close attention to the technology giant’s determined stance on opposing the US government in the latter’s request to build a software image to break the encryption of an Apple iPhone.
A quick run-through of the face-off sees the FBI holding possession of an iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernadino shooters but unable to gain access to the phone’s data after being unable to crack the passcode of the device. As a consequence, the FBI, via a US court order demanded Apple make a custom piece of its iOS software to circumvent the iPhone’s security measures. Apple, in its pro-encryption ideology, has publicly opposed the court order, stating that building a backdoor would be “dangerous” in the means to safeguarding the privacy of millions of Apple device users in the country.
Understandably, the stand-off makes for heated debate. The FBI wants to gain information from a terrorist’s phone to potentially discover information about the terrorist’s contacts which could lead to further intelligence gathering. Apple and its supporters see the consequence of an action wherein government is forcing a company to break the security of its own devices. It would set a dangerous precedent.
In adding to Tim Cook’s original open letter, Apple has released an FAQ today, directly addressing the questions that followed after Apple publicly vowed to fight the US government over the court order.
One of the most-asked questions about the Apple-FBI stand-off is why Apple couldn’t just build the software one time, to fix the one iPhone that the FBI is seeking to gain access to. In its response, Apple contends that the digital world is different to the physical one, wherein once a technique is created in the digital realm, it can be replicated over and over again, on a number of devices, even if the idea is to destroy it after a one-time usage.
Apple’s explanation read:
Law enforcement agents around the country have already said they have hundreds of iPhones they want Apple to unlock if the FBI wins this case. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks.
Of course, Apple would do our best to protect that key, but in a world where all of our data is under constant threat, it would be relentlessly attacked by hackers and cybercriminals. As recent attacks on the IRS systems and countless other data breaches have shown, no one is immune to cyberattacks.
The answer ended with Apple reiterating its stance, in stating:
Again, we strongly believe the only way to guarantee that such a powerful tool isn’t abused and doesn’t fall into the wrong hands is to never create it.
Another question asks if Apple has ever unlocked iPhones for law enforcement in the past.
To this, Apple flatly denies that it hasn’t unlocked iPhones in the past for law enforcement. However, it revealed that –following a lawful court order – the company has extracted data from an iPhone, on devices running iOS versions prior to iOS 8.
For the skeptics who claim that Apple’s hardened objection to the governmental request is a marketing strategy to enhance its brand, the answer was swift.
Absolutely not. Nothing could be further from the truth.
This is and always has been about our customers. We feel strongly that if we were to do what the government has asked of us — to create a backdoor to our products — not only is it unlawful, but it puts the vast majority of good and law-abiding citizens, who rely on iPhone to protect their most personal and important data, at risk.
The entire FAQ makes for interesting insight into Apple’s unrelenting stance on encryption.
Featured image from Shutterstock.
The Pirate Bay is Hijacking PCs to Stealth-Mine Cryptocurrency
For the second time in as many months, The Pirate Bay has been caught mining cryptocurrency on your computer without consent. The torrent platform was actually test-driving cryptocurrency mining in your browser – no doubt a lucrative revenue stream.
The Pirates Are At It Again
The news was later confirmed by Bleeping Computer, which reported that,”The Pirate Bay, the internet’s largest torrent portal, is back at running a cryptocurrency miner after it previously ran a short test in mid-September.”
Estimates indicate that the scheme has earned the pirates a total of $43,000 over a three-week period.
Users had no way to opt their computers out of being test-driven by the torrent network. Back in September, The Pirate Bay got away by telling people it was just a test. The site’s owners cannot use the same excuse this time around.
CoinHive advises websites to let their visitors know their browser is being used to mine cryptocurrency.
“We’re a bit saddened to see that some of our customers integrate CoinHive into their pages without disclosing to their users what’s going on, let alone asking for their permission,” the company said.
The good news is most ad-blockers and antivirus programs will block CoinHive, given its recent abuses. That means not all visitors of The Pirate Pay were being used as a conduit for mining Monero.
Monero Joins Global Crypto Rally
The value of Monero (XMR) shot up nearly 8% on Friday, and was last seen trading at $94.17. With more than 15.2 million XMR tokens in circulation, the total market cap for Monero is $1.4 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. That’s enough for ninth on the global cryptocurrency list.
Twelve cryptos have now crossed the $1 billion valuation mark. A handful of others have made their way north of $500 million.
Ethereum Notches Two-Month High as Bitcoin Offspring Triggers Volatility
Digital currency Ethereum climbed to a two-month high on Monday, taking some of the heat off Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash, which have slumped since the weekend.
Ethereum Forges Higher Path
Concerns over Bitcoin created a favourable tailwind for Ethereum (ETH/USD), which is the world’s No. 2 digital currency by total assets. Ether’s price topped $340.00 on Monday and later settled at $323.54. That was the highest since June 20.
At its peak, ether was up 10% on the day and 70% for the month of August.
The ETH/USD was last down 2.2% at $315.02, according to Bitfinex. Prices are due for a brisk recovery, based on the daily momentum indicators.
Fractured Bitcoin Community
Bitcoin and its offshoot, Bitcoin Cash, retreated on Monday following a volatile weekend. The BTC/USD slumped at the start of the week and was down more than 3% on Tuesday, with prices falling below $3,900.00. Just last week, Bitcoin was trading at new records near $4,500.00.
Bitcoin Cash, which emerged after the Aug. 1 hard fork, climbed to new records on Saturday, but has been in free-fall ever since. The BTH was down another 20% on Tuesday to $594.49, according to CoinMarketCap. Its total market value has dropped by several billion over the past two days.
Analysts say that a “fractured” Bitcoin community has made Ethereum a more attractive bet this week. The ether token has shown remarkable poise over the past seven days, despite trading well shy of a new record.
Other drivers behind Ethereum’s advance are steady demand from South Korean investors and growing confidence in a smooth upgrade for the the ETH network. The upgrade, which has been dubbed “Metropolis,” is expected in the next several weeks. Its key benefits include tighter transaction privacy and greater efficiency.
Ethereum Prices Unaffected by ICO Heist
Fin-tech developer Enigma was on the receiving end of a cyber-heist on Monday after hackers took over the company’s website, mailing list and instant messaging platforms. The hack occurred three weeks before Enigma’s planned Initial Coin Offering (ICO) for September 11.
In addition to defacing the company’s website, the hackers pushed a special “pre-sale” ahead of the ICO. While many users realized it was a scam, 1,492 ether tokens – valued at $495,000 – were directed into the hackers’ cryptocurrency wallet by unsuspecting backers.
The irony in all this is that Engima is a cryptography company that prides itself on top-notch security protocols. The company issued a statement that its servers had not been compromised.
Spotting a Well-Made Investment Scam
For every reasonably safe investment, there are 1000 scams and 10,000 reasonably toxic investments. Self-served advertising via social media and search engines exacerbates the problem – people sometimes click ads they think were search results, or, as humans are intended to, simply consumes the content on the screen instead of paying attention to where they’re being redirected to.
In this article we will review a recent example of a well-executed investment scam.
The intended victim, who did not actually get scammed but alerted this author to the hustle, was led to believe that the above image was redirecting to a CNN news article. This is the actual URL the link went to:
Now if you visit com-cat.press, all you see is a directory listing. This site’s entire purpose is to make people believe they are visiting legitimate .com websites, when in fact they are visiting others. It doesn’t always have to be a scam, sometimes it is simple an advertisement, but often enough it is a definite funnel to a scam. In this case, here’s where you wind up, at a place that looks an awful lot like CNN Money:
Again, this is not a real article on CNN. This is promotion for 10Markets.eu.
10Markets.eu is extremely professional looking. The platform looks to capture your details even just for demo trading. Most traders expect hurdles, so one can imagine tons of phone numbers and e-mail addresses entered:
The demo trading screen never loaded for this analyst, but the phone number is fake anyway. Took it from a coffee shop in Germany. Funnily, it appears the German exchange code is 030 in the first place, but you can’t edit that part. They also don’t allow you to visit the site at all if you’re in North America.
The tipster was clever enough to find out if 10Markets.eu was a registered broker or not. They’re not. According to ForexBrokerz.com:
10Markets is a forex and CFD broker that is headquartered in Scotland [sic] and supports the popular MetaTrader 4 platform. It is not licensed by any authority and there is not much information about the trading conditions on its website. What is worse, this broker is present in the warning lists of UK’s FCA, Australia’s ASIC and Cyprus’ CySEC, so we don’t recommend doing business with 10Markets.
There are review websites which help. Regarding 10Markets, we came up with this one.
The tipster happens to have been our own Jonas Borchgrevink. He is equipped with years of experience in website publishing, and this is why he quickly noticed that he was not reading a CNN article. The sad fact is that a high percentage of people who read that article believe it to be real, and a percentage of those people end up getting scammed. As such, here is a checklist for new trading outfits that you haven’t used or heard about before:
- Always try to get phone support right away. Before creating an account. If no one answers or there is anything suspicious, this is a scam.
- Always search for “[EXCHANGE NAME]” + “scam,” and read carefully any results that come up. Most scams could stop at one person if others listened to that one.
- In the US, you can use FINRA to check the legitimacy of an exchange or broker. In the UK, you have FCA. Many countries have sites like these, and it’s important to check the one from the country where the broker does business.
- Use ad blockers at least when legitimately searching for financial solutions.
- Check the URL! For every legitimate exchange website, there are a few fake ones designed to steal your account information.
In The Event That You Spot A Scam
Tattle! Spread the word far and wide, not just so others don’t get scammed, but also to give authorities the jump on the thieves. Otherwise, they may exit and get away with all the money before anyone stops them.
- Daily Analysis: Dollar Rally Continues amid Fed Chair Confusion October 17, 2017
- Technical Analysis: NEO Jumps as Broad Markets Turns Lower October 17, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Syscoin October 17, 2017
- Trade Recommendation: Lisk October 17, 2017
- Information on Russia’s Regulation of Cryptocurrency Surfaces October 17, 2017
- Gold Creating Kilonova October 17, 2017
- Asian Market Update – Tuesday: Cryptocurrency prices consolidate after strong rally October 17, 2017
- Former Fed Chief Bernanke Backs Blockchain, but Not Bitcoin October 17, 2017
- Bitcoin Takes a Breather as Prices Drop Below $5,700 October 17, 2017
- ICO Analysis: Genesis Vision October 17, 2017
Ethereum1 week ago
Ethereum’s Hard Fork Is Coming
ICO1 week ago
ICO Analysis: TripAlly
Analysis5 days ago
Analysis: Bitcoin Price at $5200, How Much is There Left in the Tank?
Analysis4 days ago
Technical Analysis: Ethereum, Monero, and Litecoin Jump as Bitcoin Goes Parabolic
Analysis2 days ago
5 Things to Watch Next Week: Byzantium, Bitcoin Stretched, Gold’s Strength, The Next Fed Chair, Kirkuk and Crude Oil
Cryptocurrencies6 days ago
Trade Recommendation: Monero
ICO3 days ago
ICO Analysis: UTRUST
ICO6 days ago
ICO Analysis: Request Network